Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Aero seatpost

Started by psycholist · · Last activity · 17 posts · 663 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 February 2005
Last activity
28 February 2005
Original author
psycholist
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
663
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would point
    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts, but
    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  2. psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would point
    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts, but
    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Mike Burrows, designer of Chris Boardman's Lotus Olympic bike, says
    they're worth it. Other people say the airflow is already so disturbed
    by the bars and your legs (you do cycle with your legs almost touching
    the top tube, don't you?) that the post makes no difference at all.

    Still, it's a cheap upgrade if it frightens the opposition...

  3. On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0500, "psycholist" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would point
    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts, but
    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    http://www.trinewbies.com/Printable-articles/Cycling-JCobb2-Technology.htm

    "Technology: Wheels, Watts & More
    by John Cobb

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It was a pretty day, a light westerly breeze blowing the hot summer
    air out over the waters. All along the docks there were wives and
    loved ones crying and holding their loved ones until the last moment.
    As the very last few moments came there were pleas and shouts of fear
    that these sailors would never return. These brave young men were
    embarking on an adventure that was doomed, guaranteed to fail. The
    wise men and the scholars had all spoken their positions and there was
    no real hope, everyone knew this was the wrong direction to go. These
    adventurers were off to discover new worlds, but first they had to
    break over the edge, the edge of the earth because everyone new that
    the earth was FLAT.

    Technology has a way of making our lives uncomfortable. Technology can
    seemingly complicate and confuse our lives. But technology will always
    reveal the truths about objects, forcing the adventurers into more
    exploration.

    A few months ago I wrote an article about how Aero seat posts don’t
    work. On the surface that’s a pretty big statement to make and since I
    had long been a proponent of all things aero and aero seat post in
    particular, those were some hard words to type. Certainly if there is
    not a rider on the bike then a thin aero post does work well. But
    don't forget, we must have riders to ride our bikes and that changes
    things a great deal. There are several of us that continued to study
    this area and we are learning a great deal about specialized air
    control around the rider. And with potentially new discoveries on the
    horizon, we now have a new direction into which to look which has
    forced us to explore the relationship of the aero seat post verses the
    rider's positioning. And as we research and discover new data we can
    then provide you, the consumer, some insight into this issue so that
    you make better purchasing decisions.

    I have been going to wind tunnels for more than 15 years now to study
    bicycle air flow. I have made every mistake possible, made most of
    them twice, but have continue to push on and learn about how to make a
    rider go faster. One of the biggest ingredients that I’ve found for
    aero success is a willingness to admit failure, the strength to
    believe in something, develop it, test it, and then get your feelings
    hurt when it’s proven wrong. As I’ve continued to study different
    parts of the bike, the one area that always looms as very important
    is... wheels.

    Wheels. Without wheels you’re not going very far. Wheels are so
    interesting yet so confusing to cyclist. There’s a variety of shapes
    and configurations and there is an ocean of difference in price
    between two objects that appear pretty similar. If you take the money
    out of the equation and just look at the technical aspects, it can get
    overwhelming. If you throw in some marketing hype that is almost never
    backed up by research, then wheels can become downright intimidating.
    I began trying to show the difference in wheels by expressing the
    energy they require to spin through the air in watts. Watts are the
    amount of energy a human can generate over a given distance and since
    we, as humans, have difficulty generating very many, we need to use
    them carefully. Originally and still to this day, we talk about wheel
    drag or the effort it takes for air to pass over a wheel. Wheel drag
    can only be measured in a wind tunnel and wind tunnels are expensive
    and not readily available for people to use. Drag numbers are also
    hard for riders to relate to because these numbers are affected by
    everything around the object. Loose clothing, long hair, tube sizes
    and shapes all affect this drag number. Watts generated by wheels are
    not affected by these outside factors so that makes it a better way to
    express good, bad, or better. Over the years, I’ve continued to try
    and enlist the help of various manufacturers to learn about wheels and
    pay for some of the wind tunnel time. Most of the manufacturers are
    very hesitant to get involved because it gives their competitors all
    the information for free and they can’t seem to get past that.

    One company, Hed wheels, did jump on the band wagon early on and has
    continued to stay heavily involved in wheel research. Steve Hed has
    always been an open book to the athletes and to his competitors,
    trying to convey the most accurate information. Very few companies
    have spent the time or money to develop products in this way. It's the
    been a long hard road but it has led to great success for Hed wheels.

    As I said earlier, watts are something on which we need to focus. The
    engineers at Texas A&M have been working with me for the last 3-4
    years to develop a way to consistently measure wheel watts. My last
    trip to the wind tunnel was in Sept. ’02 and it was like sailing off
    the edge of the earth only to discover that the earth was round. I
    believe we have conquered wheel watts and how to measure them
    correctly. This would normally be cause for great celebration, big
    fireworks and much partying, except that as usual with all things in
    research it trashed everything I thought I new. The next step will now
    be to find a way to express watts/drag and steering torque in simple
    terms that means the same thing to everyone. When we solve that
    equation, and hopefully very soon, all or you will benefit a great
    deal. I’m hoping to come up with an "Energy Value System" that will
    take into account the drag / steering torque/ watts and give a value
    verses price that the industry will maybe adopt.

    Technical adventures are a lot like the old sailing adventures of
    Columbus and others. You make some mistakes, you run aground every now
    and then, but eventually, you find a new world.

    Train Hard and be well

    John Cobb

  4. Zog The Undeniable said:

    Still, it's a cheap upgrade if it frightens the opposition...

    Hey, it frightens me...

    --
    Kenneth

    If you email... Please remove the "SPAMLESS."

  5. dianne_1234 said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0500, "psycholist" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would point
    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts, but
    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    http://www.trinewbies.com/Printable-articles/Cycling-JCobb2-Technology.htm

    Dear Dianne,

    Do you know how (or if) Cobb handles the problem of spinning
    both the bicycle's wheels and getting the rider to pedal in
    wind-tunnel tests?

    The wind-tunnel pictures that I've seen seem to show riders
    crouching motionless on bikes whose wheels aren't moving,
    which isn't a very good imitation of the real thing.

    Carl Fogel

  6. psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's
    got a very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data
    that would point to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost
    would make any meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the
    Corima carbon posts, but I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a
    waste. On the other hand, my objective is to assemble the fastest
    bike I can and that's one area that remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Get it. You know you want to. <eg>

  7. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    dianne_1234 said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0500, "psycholist" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would


    point

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts,


    but

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.


    http://www.trinewbies.com/Printable-articles/Cycling-JCobb2-Technology.htm

    Dear Dianne,

    Do you know how (or if) Cobb handles the problem of spinning
    both the bicycle's wheels and getting the rider to pedal in
    wind-tunnel tests?

    The wind-tunnel pictures that I've seen seem to show riders
    crouching motionless on bikes whose wheels aren't moving,
    which isn't a very good imitation of the real thing.

    Carl Fogel

    Carl-

    The photos here:
    http://www.multisports.com/windtunnel_camp.shtml
    Seem to show pedaling and rollers for both wheels.
    Got $750 ?

    Dan

  8. "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's
    got a very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data
    that would point to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost
    would make any meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the
    Corima carbon posts, but I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a
    waste. On the other hand, my objective is to assemble the fastest
    bike I can and that's one area that remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Get it. You know you want to. <eg>

    Yep ... you got that right. That Corima pin would look awesome. But I am a
    mesomorph ... great big 'ol thighs that probably block that entire airspace
    already, anyway. But you've got me pegged. As soon as I finish
    rationalizing the spending of the money, I'll have that post. I'm just not
    quite there yet.

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  9. Dan said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    dianne_1234 said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:24:15 -0500, "psycholist" <[email hidden]>
    wrote:

    >I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    >very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would


    point

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    >meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts,


    but

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    >objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    >remains to be addressed.
    >
    >Thanks for any insights.

    http://www.trinewbies.com/Printable-articles/Cycling-JCobb2-Technology.htm

    Dear Dianne,

    Do you know how (or if) Cobb handles the problem of spinning
    both the bicycle's wheels and getting the rider to pedal in
    wind-tunnel tests?

    The wind-tunnel pictures that I've seen seem to show riders
    crouching motionless on bikes whose wheels aren't moving,
    which isn't a very good imitation of the real thing.

    Carl Fogel

    Carl-

    The photos here:
    http://www.multisports.com/windtunnel_camp.shtml
    Seem to show pedaling and rollers for both wheels.
    Got $750 ?

    Dan

    Dear Dan,

    When I look at the details here . . .

    http://www.multisports.com/news/1057782031.shtml

    .. . . I do see pedal cadence, so the rear wheel is moving.
    The text is a little unclear about whether this is unlike
    other wind tunnel test platform--they may mean only that
    it's raised to eliminate ground effect (presumably from the
    tunnel, not normal ground effect, but maybe not).

    But the front wheel is probably more important than the
    rear, since the rest of the bike passes through its
    turbulence, and I can't find anything about it spinning.

    The middle picture ("straight ahead"😉 shows the front spokes
    apparently motionless, but it could be just the illusion of
    a high-speed snapshot or perhaps only a posed picture, not
    live and spinning.

    There might be a small patch under the front wheel with
    rollers too small to see in the picture, but the patch might
    be just the reflection from the rim on the polished metal
    surface. The text says only that "the front wheel stands
    free, without any supports to throw off drag readings."

    If they have an amazing set of powered front rollers that
    spin the front wheel up to the speed indicated on the rear
    wheel, I think that they'd mention it.

    Thanks for the link--I like to peer at such stuff.

    Carl Fogel

  10. psycholist said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's
    got a very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data
    that would point to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost
    would make any meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the
    Corima carbon posts, but I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a
    waste. On the other hand, my objective is to assemble the fastest
    bike I can and that's one area that remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Get it. You know you want to. <eg>

    Yep ... you got that right. That Corima pin would look awesome. But I am a
    mesomorph ... great big 'ol thighs that probably block that entire airspace
    already, anyway. But you've got me pegged. As soon as I finish
    rationalizing the spending of the money, I'll have that post. I'm just not
    quite there yet.

    Dear Dan,

    A good rationalization executed today is better than a
    perfect rationalization executed at some indefinite point in
    the future.

    George Patton

  11. On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:20:20 -0700, [email hidden]

    Quoted message said:
    psycholist said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    psycholist wrote:
    > I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's
    > got a very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data
    > that would point to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost
    > would make any meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the
    > Corima carbon posts, but I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a
    > waste. On the other hand, my objective is to assemble the fastest
    > bike I can and that's one area that remains to be addressed.
    >
    > Thanks for any insights.

    Get it. You know you want to. <eg>

    Yep ... you got that right. That Corima pin would look awesome. But I am a
    mesomorph ... great big 'ol thighs that probably block that entire airspace
    already, anyway. But you've got me pegged. As soon as I finish
    rationalizing the spending of the money, I'll have that post. I'm just not
    quite there yet.

    Dear Dan,

    A good rationalization executed today is better than a
    perfect rationalization executed at some indefinite point in
    the future.

    George Patton

    Oops--Bob, not Dan!

  12. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:46:34 -0800, "Dan"
    Dear Dan,

    When I look at the details here . . .

    http://www.multisports.com/news/1057782031.shtml

    . . . I do see pedal cadence, so the rear wheel is moving.
    The text is a little unclear about whether this is unlike
    other wind tunnel test platform--they may mean only that
    it's raised to eliminate ground effect (presumably from the
    tunnel, not normal ground effect, but maybe not).

    But the front wheel is probably more important than the
    rear, since the rest of the bike passes through its
    turbulence, and I can't find anything about it spinning.

    The middle picture ("straight ahead"😉 shows the front spokes
    apparently motionless, but it could be just the illusion of
    a high-speed snapshot or perhaps only a posed picture, not
    live and spinning.

    There might be a small patch under the front wheel with
    rollers too small to see in the picture, but the patch might
    be just the reflection from the rim on the polished metal
    surface. The text says only that "the front wheel stands
    free, without any supports to throw off drag readings."

    If they have an amazing set of powered front rollers that
    spin the front wheel up to the speed indicated on the rear
    wheel, I think that they'd mention it.

    Thanks for the link--I like to peer at such stuff.

    Carl Fogel

    A bit of googling finds:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel.html

    Which states:
    "There are a pair of motors that independently turn the front and rear
    wheels."

    A photo shows the rollers:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel1.jpg

    This sounds like a pretty cool setup with variable speeds and pedaling
    resistance. The idea of testing the rider's power and efficiency in an aero
    position is a good one.

    Have fun,
    Dan

  13. psycholist said:

    "S o r n i" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's
    got a very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data
    that would point to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost
    would make any meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the
    Corima carbon posts, but I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a
    waste. On the other hand, my objective is to assemble the fastest
    bike I can and that's one area that remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.

    Get it. You know you want to. <eg>

    Yep ... you got that right. That Corima pin would look awesome. But I am a
    mesomorph ... great big 'ol thighs that probably block that entire airspace
    already, anyway. But you've got me pegged. As soon as I finish
    rationalizing the spending of the money, I'll have that post. I'm just not
    quite there yet.

    Chics dig 'em... does that help?

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

  14. "Mark Hickey" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Chics dig 'em... does that help?

    Mark Hickey
    Habanero Cycles
    http://www.habcycles.com
    Home of the $695 ti frame

    That does it. Where's my credit card?

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  15. psycholist said:

    I'm building up a TT bike. I've got it all put together, but it's got a
    very conventional seatpost. Does anyone have any good data that would point
    to whether or not investing in a good aero seatpost would make any
    meaningful difference? I'm considering one of the Corima carbon posts, but
    I don't need to toss $125 if it's just a waste. On the other hand, my
    objective is to assemble the fastest bike I can and that's one area that
    remains to be addressed.

    Thanks for any insights.


    it costs about that for a carbon post anyway, so if you want a tt bike,
    & it looks the part, why not?

  16. On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:35:44 -0800, "Dan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:46:34 -0800, "Dan"
    Dear Dan,

    When I look at the details here . . .

    http://www.multisports.com/news/1057782031.shtml

    . . . I do see pedal cadence, so the rear wheel is moving.
    The text is a little unclear about whether this is unlike
    other wind tunnel test platform--they may mean only that
    it's raised to eliminate ground effect (presumably from the
    tunnel, not normal ground effect, but maybe not).

    But the front wheel is probably more important than the
    rear, since the rest of the bike passes through its
    turbulence, and I can't find anything about it spinning.

    The middle picture ("straight ahead"😉 shows the front spokes
    apparently motionless, but it could be just the illusion of
    a high-speed snapshot or perhaps only a posed picture, not
    live and spinning.

    There might be a small patch under the front wheel with
    rollers too small to see in the picture, but the patch might
    be just the reflection from the rim on the polished metal
    surface. The text says only that "the front wheel stands
    free, without any supports to throw off drag readings."

    If they have an amazing set of powered front rollers that
    spin the front wheel up to the speed indicated on the rear
    wheel, I think that they'd mention it.

    Thanks for the link--I like to peer at such stuff.

    Carl Fogel

    A bit of googling finds:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel.html

    Which states:
    "There are a pair of motors that independently turn the front and rear
    wheels."

    A photo shows the rollers:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel1.jpg

    This sounds like a pretty cool setup with variable speeds and pedaling
    resistance. The idea of testing the rider's power and efficiency in an aero
    position is a good one.

    Have fun,
    Dan

    Here's another photo where you can glimpse the roller that drives the
    front wheel:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2005/tech/features/lance_tunnel/Scottset-up
    or http://tinyurl.com/6rowq

  17. dianne_1234 said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:35:44 -0800, "Dan" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:46:34 -0800, "Dan"
    Dear Dan,

    When I look at the details here . . .

    http://www.multisports.com/news/1057782031.shtml

    . . . I do see pedal cadence, so the rear wheel is moving.
    The text is a little unclear about whether this is unlike
    other wind tunnel test platform--they may mean only that
    it's raised to eliminate ground effect (presumably from the
    tunnel, not normal ground effect, but maybe not).

    But the front wheel is probably more important than the
    rear, since the rest of the bike passes through its
    turbulence, and I can't find anything about it spinning.

    The middle picture ("straight ahead"😉 shows the front spokes
    apparently motionless, but it could be just the illusion of
    a high-speed snapshot or perhaps only a posed picture, not
    live and spinning.

    There might be a small patch under the front wheel with
    rollers too small to see in the picture, but the patch might
    be just the reflection from the rim on the polished metal
    surface. The text says only that "the front wheel stands
    free, without any supports to throw off drag readings."

    If they have an amazing set of powered front rollers that
    spin the front wheel up to the speed indicated on the rear
    wheel, I think that they'd mention it.

    Thanks for the link--I like to peer at such stuff.

    Carl Fogel

    A bit of googling finds:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel.html

    Which states:
    "There are a pair of motors that independently turn the front and rear
    wheels."

    A photo shows the rollers:
    http://slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/newtunnel1.jpg

    This sounds like a pretty cool setup with variable speeds and pedaling
    resistance. The idea of testing the rider's power and efficiency in an aero
    position is a good one.

    Have fun,
    Dan

    Here's another photo where you can glimpse the roller that drives the
    front wheel:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=photos/2005/tech/features/lance_tunnel/Scottset-up
    or http://tinyurl.com/6rowq

    Dear D(i)an(ne),

    Aha! I can see the front roller (presumably powered) in all
    the pictures that you both supplied of the wind tunnels. Now
    that I know that I was simply out of date, I can sleep
    better.

    (The picture with the front spokes apparently motionless
    must be posed or high-speed film.)

    Thanks to both of you,

    Carl Fogel

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.