General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

GM Diet program

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 50 posts · 4,801 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
8 February 2005
Last activity
15 February 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
50
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
4,801
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 21–40 of 50
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Mack McKinnon said:

    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20


    pounds

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any


    way, it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    won't "work"?

    Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so


    maintenance

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.

    Not only would he gain the weight back (assuming no eating-habit


    changes)

    Quoted message said:

    but he would gain it back in different places, since some of his old


    fat

    Quoted message said:

    cell storage areas had been liposuctioned away. Depending on how


    much fat

    Quoted message said:

    was lipoed off, the new fat might show up in some pretty weird spots.

    Assuming a male would have the fat removed from the abdominal area, fat
    would then accumulate in other regions in line with a adroid pattern:
    upper and lower back first, then other areas that may be more
    associated with a gynoid pattern: arms and thighs/hips. Eventually,
    some of the preadipocytes (the fat cell precurors) in the abdominal
    area would then be recruited to become differentiated fat cells and the
    ab fat would slowly reappear.

    Quoted message said:

    I once asked a plastic surgeon I knew if a woman could enlarge her


    breasts

    Quoted message said:

    by having fat lipoed away from all over her body except for her


    breasts and

    Quoted message said:

    then eat to gain weight again. He said, "Sure, in theory at least,


    that

    Quoted message said:

    would work."

    Sure, theoretically it would because the excess energy has to be stored
    somewhere. And the liver 🙂

    Quoted message said:

    mack
    austin

    Austin, TX?


  2. Quoted message said:
    (Martin Bakalorz) said:
    David Cohen said:

    If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20


    pounds

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any


    way, it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    won't "work"?

    Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so


    maintenance

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    Just had to defend hotmail posters.

    [a] People don't "change lifestyles" because someone tells them to do
    it. Immediate fat loss results can be a major motivation.

    According to a survey presented at a seminar here, ~57% of patients
    having liposuction had no weight gain 6 months post-surgery. However,
    ~54% of that population reported no weight changes at all. Of the ~43%
    who did report weight gain 6 months post-surgery, 56% of that
    population gained weight in the range of 5-10 lbs and 28% gained over
    11 pounds. The small % that actually realized a weight loss through 6
    months post-surgery is pathetically small.

    No one can make any person do anything; it has to come from within.
    Instant gratification by immdiate weight loss is only one motivation.
    But it's short-term. Mostly only those with limited intelligence use
    that as their only motivation. There are plenty of other derived
    benefits from changing lifestlyes than immediate fatloss.

    [quote="Quoted message"][b] A "lifestyle change" won't affect some things, like reduced[/quote]
    levels

    Quoted message said:

    of circulating leptin due to decreases in adipose mass, so "changing
    your lifestyle" is not assured to be a permanent solution.



    Nothing in this world is 'assured'. But the high probability of losing
    weight and maintaining weight loss that accompanies changing your
    lifestyle is a better bet than instant gratification of liposuction.
    And decreased leptin is not the only result of weight loss and can
    actually be manipulated to a certain extent so as to have less impact
    on weight control.

    Lifestyle change is a process whereby we make conscious and informed
    decisions to take control of how our body interacts with the
    environment. Some of us are forced to do that if we want to live a
    healthy and fulfilling life. Others do so because they plainly feel
    better about themselves and the world around them. The alternative is
    to sit on your ass and give in to your base impulses or continue on a
    road to [censored].

    Regardless, trade offs exist for every choice we make. We are not
    puppets. Well some of us are but that's their choice, too. In nearly
    all of the literature associated with health issues (mental and
    physical), altering lifestyle to favorably mediate the response between
    you, your body and the environment is more successful than all the
    quick fixes. So if someone wants to sit on their ass or take the quick
    fix, that is their choice, but don't [censored] about it and make excuses.

  3. "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20 pounds
    of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way, it
    won't "work"?

    Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you. However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    Quoted message said:


    Just had to defend hotmail posters.

    You are not an "anonymous" Hotmail poster.

    In fact, we at the International Zionist Cabal have all your personal
    information. BTW, the check you wrote to BDSMtoys.com is gonna' bounce, so
    you might want to fix that 🙂

    David

  4. David Cohen said:


    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20 pounds
    of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way, it
    won't "work"?

    Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you. However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    I don't think that a reduction of fat (and 20 lbs is a hell of a lot)
    will alter BMR that rapidly. So the assertion that maintenance
    calories must be reduced to match the fat loss is not correct. Energy
    balance must be a deficit if the person is to maintain the fat loss,
    however.

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to make
    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated choices.

    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep it
    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have to
    make to reach that goal?

    ------------------------------
    Reality is an illusion created by an intelligence deficiency.

  5. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20
    >pounds
    >of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way,
    >it
    >won't "work"?
    >
    >Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you.
    However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    I don't think that a reduction of fat (and 20 lbs is a hell of a lot)
    will alter BMR that rapidly. So the assertion that maintenance
    calories must be reduced to match the fat loss is not correct. Energy
    balance must be a deficit if the person is to maintain the fat loss,
    however.

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to make
    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated choices.

    Dropping 150ish calories from my daily intake and burning 150ish extra
    calories a day does not meet "my" definition of "lifestyle change". Your
    definition may, of course, vary.

    Quoted message said:

    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep it
    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have to
    make to reach that goal?

    Eat less, exercise more.

    Trick question.

    David

  6. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:


    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    >If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20


    pounds

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way,


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    >won't "work"?
    >
    >Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you.


    However,

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    I don't think that a reduction of fat (and 20 lbs is a hell of a lot)
    will alter BMR that rapidly. So the assertion that maintenance
    calories must be reduced to match the fat loss is not correct. Energy
    balance must be a deficit if the person is to maintain the fat loss,
    however.

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to make
    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated choices.

    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep it
    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have to
    make to reach that goal?

    ------------------------------
    Reality is an illusion created by an intelligence deficiency.

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle change
    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not done
    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I stay
    changed, the longer I live).
    Dr. Death got it all over Dr. Phil when I comes to fat loss and health.

    --
    Dr. Dickie
    Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
    Poking kooks with a pointy stick
    Proud member of the, "Vast right-wing conspiracy."

  7. David Cohen said:
    Quoted message said:

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:


    Dropping 150ish calories from my daily intake and burning 150ish


    extra

    Quoted message said:

    calories a day does not meet "my" definition of "lifestyle change".


    Your

    Quoted message said:

    definition may, of course, vary.

    Of course, which is why I proposed the challenge of dropping 12.5
    lbs/month and keeping it off. I know you well enough that it might be a
    challenge 🙂

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make to reach that goal?

    Eat less, exercise more.

    Trick question.

    It's all relative.

  8. Dr_Dickie said:
    Quoted message said:

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make to reach that goal?

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle


    change

    Quoted message said:

    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not


    done

    Quoted message said:

    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I


    stay

    Quoted message said:

    changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

  9. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie said:
    Quoted message said:

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make to reach that goal?

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle


    change

    Quoted message said:

    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not


    done

    Quoted message said:

    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I


    stay

    Quoted message said:

    changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    Also explains why losing weight is so hard for the public, and why fad diets
    are so popular. Takes a lot of work, and a lifetime of vigilance to pull it
    off. The general public simply doesn't want to learn and put in the effort
    (try teaching college students chemistry!).
    --
    Dr. Dickie
    Skepticult member in good standing #394-00596-438
    Poking kooks with a pointy stick
    Proud member of the, "Vast right-wing conspiracy."

  10. On 11 Feb 2005 05:53:42 -0800, "elzinator" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie said:
    Quoted message said:

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make to reach that goal?

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle


    change

    Quoted message said:

    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not


    done

    Quoted message said:

    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I


    stay

    Quoted message said:

    changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    That's all very well, but have you taken into account just how boring
    a maintenance diet is?

    If you want to enjoy life, and all the good things it has to offer,
    you have to accept yo-yo dieting as a way of life.

    Life gets teejus don't it?!! ;o)

    Have a great weekend - I always do!!

    TFIF!!

  11. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:
    Quoted message said:

    Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:


    Dropping 150ish calories from my daily intake and burning 150ish


    extra

    Quoted message said:

    calories a day does not meet "my" definition of "lifestyle change".


    Your

    Quoted message said:

    definition may, of course, vary.

    Of course, which is why I proposed the challenge of dropping 12.5
    lbs/month and keeping it off. I know you well enough that it might be a
    challenge 🙂

    Done it before. Probably do it again. Uh...tomorrow. Yeah, tomorrow. No
    later than Monday. Probably.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make to reach that goal?

    Eat less, exercise more.

    Trick question.

    It's all relative.

    You've met my sisters?

    David

  12. "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 11 Feb 2005 05:53:42 -0800, "elzinator" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie said:

    > Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    > caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to


    make

    Quoted message said:

    > a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:

    >
    > If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep


    it

    Quoted message said:

    > off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have


    to

    Quoted message said:

    > make to reach that goal?

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle


    change

    Quoted message said:

    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not


    done

    Quoted message said:

    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I


    stay

    Quoted message said:

    changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    That's all very well, but have you taken into account just how boring
    a maintenance diet is?

    If you want to enjoy life, and all the good things it has to offer,
    you have to accept yo-yo dieting as a way of life.

    Yes.

    I am currently in the yo cycle. I'm gonna' switch to the yo cycle at some
    point.

    David

  13. In article <[email hidden]>, "David

    Cohen said:

    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 11 Feb 2005 05:53:42 -0800, "elzinator" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie wrote:

    > > Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    > > caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to
    make
    > > a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated
    choices.
    > >
    > > If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep
    it
    > > off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have
    to
    > > make to reach that goal?
    >
    > I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle
    change
    > is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not
    done
    > so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    > (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    > better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I
    stay
    > changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    That's all very well, but have you taken into account just how boring
    a maintenance diet is?

    If you want to enjoy life, and all the good things it has to offer,
    you have to accept yo-yo dieting as a way of life.

    Yes.

    I am currently in the yo cycle. I'm gonna' switch to the yo cycle at some
    point.

    Is this the Philly diet?

    "Yo, Adrianne!"

  14. David Cohen said:


    "Charles" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On 11 Feb 2005 05:53:42 -0800, "elzinator" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie wrote:

    > > Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in daily
    > > caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has to
    make
    > > a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated
    choices.
    > >
    > > If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and keep
    it
    > > off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you have
    to
    > > make to reach that goal?
    >
    > I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a lifestyle
    change
    > is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has not
    done
    > so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise more
    > (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and eat
    > better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer I
    stay
    > changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing an
    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have to
    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    That's all very well, but have you taken into account just how boring
    a maintenance diet is?

    If you want to enjoy life, and all the good things it has to offer,
    you have to accept yo-yo dieting as a way of life.

    Yes.

    I am currently in the yo cycle. I'm gonna' switch to the yo cycle at some
    point.

    As the name implies, you'll know when it's time to revert from one yo
    to the other, which normally coincides with that awkward physical fact
    of life, when you ultimately (again) can't see your [censored] when you're
    peeing!! ;o)

    Have a great weekend David - you know I will!! ;o)

    TFIF!!

  15. Dr_Dickie said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie said:

    > Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in


    daily

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make

    Quoted message said:

    > a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated


    choices.

    Quoted message said:

    >
    > If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and


    keep

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it

    Quoted message said:

    > off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to

    Quoted message said:

    > make to reach that goal?

    I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a


    lifestyle

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change

    Quoted message said:

    is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has


    not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    done

    Quoted message said:

    so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and


    eat

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    stay

    Quoted message said:

    changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing


    an

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    Also explains why losing weight is so hard for the public, and why


    fad diets

    Quoted message said:

    are so popular. Takes a lot of work, and a lifetime of vigilance to


    pull it

    Quoted message said:

    off. The general public simply doesn't want to learn and put in the


    effort

    Quoted message said:

    (try teaching college students chemistry!).

    Biochemistry maybe, but not general chem. (taught a few labs in
    virology; does that count?)
    Make it interesting and they will come 🙂

    Same with diets. They don't have to be boring.

  16. "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie said:

    "elzinator" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Dr_Dickie wrote:

    > > Regardless, David, any long-term commitment to a reduction in


    daily

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > caloric intake requires a 'lifestyle change'; that person has


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    make
    > > a conscious choice and commitment to that and/or associated
    choices.
    > >
    > > If I told you that you had to drop 50 pounds in 4 months and


    keep

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it
    > > off or you would die, what alterations in your life would you


    have

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to
    > > make to reach that goal?
    >
    > I actually was in that situation (lost approx 100#). And a


    lifestyle

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change
    > is exactly what I did. That really is a term that someone who has


    not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    done
    > so cannot truly understand. More than just eat less and exercise


    more

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > (although that is a big part), you must also educate yourself and


    eat

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > better. No 2, 3, 4, or 6 month fix, a change for life (the longer


    I

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    stay
    > changed, the longer I live).

    That is the point I am trying to hammer home. Thanks for providing


    an

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    example.

    Many of the folks here don't realize the extent or effort that the
    general public must alter their daily routine, attitude, knowledge,
    etc. (activity and behavior) to meet their health goals. They have


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    change their lifestyle.

    Working with the general public is very enlightening.

    Also explains why losing weight is so hard for the public, and why


    fad diets

    Quoted message said:

    are so popular. Takes a lot of work, and a lifetime of vigilance to


    pull it

    Quoted message said:

    off. The general public simply doesn't want to learn and put in the


    effort

    Quoted message said:

    (try teaching college students chemistry!).

    Biochemistry maybe, but not general chem. (taught a few labs in
    virology; does that count?)
    Make it interesting and they will come 🙂

    Same with diets. They don't have to be boring.

    By the time you get them to biochem they are already chem or biology
    students (studying what they are interested in)--you got a built in hook.
    G-chem they just need for general purposes--much harder group to get
    involved. Actually, intro chem (chem for nurses and poets--sorry Cohen
    that's what some folks call it) was easier. They were just there for general
    purpose but the simplicity of the material made it easier to make fun.
    Although that had a lot to do with class size as well. G-chem or into at 250
    students is a bear. Intro or quant at 25 or 50 students is easier.

  17. David Cohen said:


    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20 pounds
    of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way, it
    won't "work"?

    Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you.

    eh ... I was mainly yanking your chain ...
    Howevvvvver ... I think the original hotmailer was closer to right
    than the statement below

    Quoted message said:

    However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    The 99.99 percent of dieters who regain all the weight they lost
    would tend to disagree with you.

    I think a longterm 10% change in calories qualifies as a lifestyle
    change.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just had to defend hotmail posters.

    You are not an "anonymous" Hotmail poster.

    In fact, we at the International Zionist Cabal have all your personal
    information. BTW, the check you wrote to BDSMtoys.com is gonna' bounce, so
    you might want to fix that 🙂

    Ha ... Now I know you're lying; they wont take checks from me or most
    other customers, only credit cards.

    The only reason they accept checks from you is because you are a
    member of their prefered customer club.

    Besides which, UPS delivered all my toys yesterday.
    I love most of the ones you recomended, although I still don't agree
    with your obsession with all the enlargers ...
    <shrug> I guess some of us are just more satisfied with what nature
    provided than others.

    Quoted message said:

    David

    Martin

  18. "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >If I am 20 pounds overweight, am stable at that weight, and have 20
    >pounds
    >of fat liposuctioned off, and do not change my "lifestyle" in any way,
    >it
    >won't "work"?
    >
    >Anonymous Hotmail posters are always morons.

    <Nit pick>
    No it won't work,
    At first you are at maintenance calories.
    After the Lipo you have 20 lbs of fat less to support, so maintenance
    calories are lower.
    If you don't change your lifestyle in any way you will slowly
    asymptotically regain to your former weight.
    </nit pick>

    I am the first to appreciate a good nit pick, so, I agree with you.

    eh ... I was mainly yanking your chain ...
    Howevvvvver ... I think the original hotmailer was closer to right
    than the statement below

    But, that would make you wrong.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    The 99.99 percent of dieters who regain all the weight they lost
    would tend to disagree with you.

    I think a longterm 10% change in calories qualifies as a lifestyle
    change.

    But, that isn't the case. First, a 10% reduction in bodyfat as a result of
    liposuction would cause less than a 10% reduction in maintenance calories.
    From, say, about 3000 calories, to about 2800 calories. Second, no one said
    you have to account for this with calorie reduction only. A couple hundred
    extra calories burned would do, or 100 less calories and 100 extra calories
    burned, or etc etc etc. Any such combination does not fit my definition of
    "lifestyle change". Your definition, is, of course, your business.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Just had to defend hotmail posters.

    You are not an "anonymous" Hotmail poster.

    In fact, we at the International Zionist Cabal have all your personal
    information. BTW, the check you wrote to BDSMtoys.com is gonna' bounce, so
    you might want to fix that 🙂

    Ha ... Now I know you're lying; they wont take checks from me or most
    other customers, only credit cards.

    The only reason they accept checks from you is because you are a
    member of their prefered customer club.

    Good point.

    Quoted message said:

    Besides which, UPS delivered all my toys yesterday.
    I love most of the ones you recomended, although I still don't agree
    with your obsession with all the enlargers ...

    They have many uses. Try to be more imaginative.

    Quoted message said:

    <shrug> I guess some of us are just more satisfied with what nature
    provided than others.

    Well, there was that tragic wheat threasher accident 🙁

    David

  19. David Cohen said:

    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:


    However,
    I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    The 99.99 percent of dieters who regain all the weight they lost
    would tend to disagree with you.

    I think a longterm 10% change in calories qualifies as a lifestyle
    change.

    But, that isn't the case. First, a 10% reduction in bodyfat as a result of
    liposuction would cause less than a 10% reduction in maintenance calories.
    From, say, about 3000 calories, to about 2800 calories. Second, no one said
    you have to account for this with calorie reduction only. A couple hundred
    extra calories burned would do, or 100 less calories and 100 extra calories
    burned, or etc etc etc. Any such combination does not fit my definition of
    "lifestyle change". Your definition, is, of course, your business.

    What does and does not constitute a "lifestyle change"? And how long
    must it last to constitute that? How much difference is there,
    really, between someone who changes things for a month, gets results,
    and gradually gravitates back to the way things were, and someone who
    does it for two years before regressing?
    --

    JMW
    http://www.rustyiron.net

  20. "JMW" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    David Cohen said:

    "Martin Bakalorz" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:

    "David Cohen" <[email hidden]> wrote:
    >
    > However,
    >I would not consider a reduction in maintenance calories to reflect the
    >lower weight (200-300 calories) to constitute a "lifestyle change".

    The 99.99 percent of dieters who regain all the weight they lost
    would tend to disagree with you.

    I think a longterm 10% change in calories qualifies as a lifestyle
    change.

    But, that isn't the case. First, a 10% reduction in bodyfat as a result of
    liposuction would cause less than a 10% reduction in maintenance calories.
    From, say, about 3000 calories, to about 2800 calories. Second, no one
    said
    you have to account for this with calorie reduction only. A couple hundred
    extra calories burned would do, or 100 less calories and 100 extra
    calories
    burned, or etc etc etc. Any such combination does not fit my definition of
    "lifestyle change". Your definition, is, of course, your business.

    What does and does not constitute a "lifestyle change"? And how long
    must it last to constitute that? How much difference is there,
    really, between someone who changes things for a month, gets results,
    and gradually gravitates back to the way things were, and someone who
    does it for two years before regressing?

    Exactly. As I've been pointing out, the definition of "lifestyle change" is
    extremely individual. There is no one answer.

    David

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.