"mfhor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Peter Signorini said:"mfhor" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:No, I meant that ALL touring clubs tend towards this, especially the
fully loaded, canvas pannier bunch.
That's my sort of touring.
Quoted message said:FWIW, some of the most boring conversations I've ever had about/whilst
cycling have been with people wearing woolly jerseys with an (x)BTC
roundel sewn on one of the pockets.
We do have the MBTC sportswool top, with badge, very comfy. But I don't wear
it that often; polarfleece, Ground Effect and other newer clothes are well
regarded in our club.
Quoted message said:reckon? Just how many gears did you say you had? Suntour?
Well no-one uses SunTour now as the big S has pushed them over. Still don't
much like Shimano's ideas on chains and joining pins. But back in the early
80s, if you toured, SunTour were far superior to most other derailleurs.
You made it
Quoted message said:COMPATIBLE, ahhh. Uh-huh. THIS is what carbon fibre is for
CF don't work to well with touring racks to carry loads. And touring does
include multi-day tours, not all of which will be 'credit card touring' on
svelte tarmac roads, in Australia at least.
Quoted message said:the mandatorily Reynolds-framed tourer with multiple mirrors and
mudguards lags some way behind).
Not mandatory at all - the only Reynolds frame I own is my old racing bike.
Like many in MBTC, I tour on a converted rigid MTB. Pannier racks, mudguards
yes. Only one bar-end mirror, but it is invaluable in traffic. As for
lagging behind, put 25 kgs on your CF 'lightweight' (is it a pure roadie?)
and it won't be that much lighter than my MTB with 25 kgs. Body weight is
probably more of a factor.
Getting back on thread - ride the bike, get fit, ride faster. Whether it's
an old MTB, city hybrid or slick Giant OCR the same principle applies.
Cheers
Peter