On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:39:11 GMT in rec.bicycles.rides, "Ken
Roberts said:Dennis wrote
Quoted message said:I felt safer cycling across Paris ... than I ever have in any major urban
area in the US.
* Have you actually ridden in New York City specifically? (I think NYC is
the most European of the big U.S. cities, notably in regard to its public
transportation network)
yes. i lived there for about 6 weeks in 1967. i brought a bike
with me and it was my major transportation unless i was going off
manhattan. the one saving grace of having a bike was that even
then midtown was gridlocked several times a week at mid-day.
and san francisco has public transport that is far better than
nyc, and a city that is far more european in feel. have you ever
been to europe? it sure doesn't sound like you have.
Quoted message said:* Did you actually use the New York City Cycling Map? (instead of like most
long-distance touring cyclists, just "winging it" and not bothering to check
ahead for local bicycling resources)
there was no such thing in 1967.
Quoted message said:* Did you know and use assertive "vehicular" riding strategies in NYC?
(instead of practicing traffic-avoidance like mentioned in Paris)
of course. even the pedestrians in nyc are assertive!
Quoted message said:* Did you try riding in NYC on a quiet weekend morning, or a crowded weekday
rush-hour? (how does that compare with the day and time you chose to ride
across Paris)
nowhwere near as nice. nyc neighborhood architecture simply
can't rival that of most european cities. their cities are so
much more livable.
i never felt really threatened in nyc, but didn't spend much time
in harlem or bed-stuy, the ghettos then, before the south bronx
had deteriorated so badly. there were, however, neighborhoods
where i simply got the gut feeling that it wasn't a good place to
be, and i got out of them quickly.
Quoted message said:* Did you experience the excitement and energy of the greatest city in North
America? (or did you just manage to cycle "across" it like with Paris) How
many days did you actually stay? Did you ride on Broadway and Wall Street?
across the Brooklyn Bridge? What neighborhoods did you visit? etc.
i'm not going to belabor it, but i worked in the east village and
in the garment district for several weeks as a temp. i spent
time in the upper east side, the lower east side including the
east village, greenwich village, and central park west. i spent
a lot of time in museums, galleries, theaters, and concerts.
i now know that i can see art, artifacts, and performances just
as good or better (and a lot cheaper!) in many other places.
being a small town boy raised on the edge of wilderness, i knew
that such a manic place full of so damn many rude & pushy people
was not the place for me. even most of the west coast was too
urban for my taste, so i came home to alaska.
cities are great places to visit for some cultural things, but i
wouldn't want to live in them. and there are many cities that
offer more and better things than new york. sorry.
Quoted message said:What cycling in Paris comes even close to the spectacular view riding the
south sidewalk across the GWB, then south on Riverside Drive on a quiet
weekend morning? What comes even close to the Central Park 10km loop? to
the southern section of the West Side Greenway?
almost anywhere in paris, but your viewpoint is like that saul
steinberg new yorker cartoon cover that shows everything on
manhattan very large, the distant shore of new jersey as small,
and "the coast" as a tiny sliver in the far, far distance. you
are so convinced that where you live is the only place in the
world. such provincialism!
i live in a scenic small town. ( see www.juneaphotos.com ) jean
shepherd was here with a crew from pbs, and i took him on a hike
in the mountains right behind town. his comment was that mother
nature had no taste, it was overdone, just toooo pretty.
if i wanted to be in a scenic urban area, i'd pick edinburgh over
new york any day. in the US, i'd pick portland or san francisco.