Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Replacing Fork

Started by jleiby · · Last activity · 10 posts · 434 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
30 January 2005
Last activity
31 January 2005
Original author
jleiby
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
434
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old cannondale road
    bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea and does anyone have
    experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like to make the bike a little
    lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It also seems I can get better
    control on the Handlebar geometry.

    Thanks

    John


  2. Quoted message said:

    I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old cannondale road
    bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea and does anyone have
    experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like to make the bike a little
    lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It also seems I can get better
    control on the Handlebar geometry.

    Thanks

    John

    Handlebar geometry has nothing to do with the fork. You can change the
    bars to ones that suit you better without changing the fork.

    Be aware that installing a "carbon" (plastic) fork will indeed save you
    a few ounces and *may* damp road buzz a little, but a few ounces off the
    total rider+bike weight is a tiny percentage. And if the new fork's
    length or offset is different than the original, you may change your
    bike's handling for the worse.

    Ted

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland, OR

  3. On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:26:44 -0500, "jleiby" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old cannondale road
    bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea and does anyone have
    experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like to make the bike a little
    lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It also seems I can get better
    control on the Handlebar geometry.

    I don't think it is a good idea. Your bicycle will be lighter but the
    smoother riding is more a myth with CF than a reality. You are about
    to spend a bunce of $ for a fork, headset, and stem that will not
    enhance the value of your bicycle.

    You can buy a used CAAD4 with the setup you want for less than what
    you are going to spend on parts and labor.

  4. jleiby said:

    I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old


    cannondale road

    Quoted message said:

    bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea and does anyone


    have

    Quoted message said:

    experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like to make the bike a


    little

    Quoted message said:

    lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It also seems I can get better
    control on the Handlebar geometry.

    Thanks

    John

    The Sette forks are generic Taiwan-made units sold on Pricepoint.com.
    They are probably identical to the Weyless forks sold by Supergo, and
    any number of similar OEM and replacement forks. Not necessarily bad,
    but you could shop around and find them for less money. For instance:
    http://www.chucksbikes.com/store/forks.htm

    Jeff

  5. Quoted message said:

    And if the new fork's
    length or offset is different than the original, you may change your
    bike's handling for the worse.

    Ted

    Or for the better.
    B

    (remove clothes to reply)

  6. jleiby said:

    I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old
    cannondale road bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea
    and does anyone have experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like
    to make the bike a little lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It
    also seems I can get better control on the Handlebar geometry.

    Thanks

    John


    You must be careful when changing to a fork with a different geometry, it
    could alter the handling characteristics for the better or worse. If you
    install a fork with a different rake and offset, you *will* change the
    handling of your bike. But you won't know until you do it, and it could
    prove to be an expensive experiment. To get the correct geometry fork, you
    must know your current fork rake and offset and choose a fork with the same
    numbers.

    There are those that have changed out their steel fork for a carbon fork and
    have reported the carbon fork is harsher than the steel., not as they hoped.

  7. jleiby said:

    I am interested in replacing the steel fork on my 6 year old cannondale road
    bike with a carbon threadless. Is that a good idea and does anyone have
    experiance with a a Sette carbon fork? I'd like to make the bike a little
    lighter and hopefully smoother riding. It also seems I can get better
    control on the Handlebar geometry.

    Thanks

    John

    well, as someone with personal experience of owning 6 different types of
    carbon forks, some great, some awful, i can say that in general, this is
    a good idea. i like the way carbon takes some of the buzz out of the
    road and threadless is definitely the way to go for ease of generic
    parts replacement.

    only caveat i have is whether your frame takes a 1" steerer or not. if
    it does, track down a fork with a steel steerer. if it's 1.125", you're
    fine with most of the generic forks. just do the squeeze test before
    buying - squeeze the blades together with one hand. if you hear any
    creaking or cracking noises, DO NOT BUY THAT FORK.

    regarding geometry, from personal experience, there's little to worry
    about. there's a small difference in feel between rakes, at least on
    the size frames i use, but it's not dramatic. you can rest assured that
    if any small geometry change was as apparently catastrophic as some
    people seem to think, there would be an awful lot of law suits out
    there. it would also negate the use of adjustable ride height mountain
    bike forks, a common commodity.

  8. "B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And if the new fork's
    length or offset is different than the original, you may change your
    bike's handling for the worse.

    Ted

    Or for the better.
    B

    (remove clothes to reply)

    Or, since the offset range of almost all carbon forks on the market is
    between 40 and 45 (most at 43), not noticably either way.

  9. (B) said:
    Quoted message said:

    And if the new fork's
    length or offset is different than the original, you may change your
    bike's handling for the worse.

    Ted

    Or for the better.
    B

    Agreed.

    Ted

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland, OR

  10. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Joselas said:

    "B" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    And if the new fork's
    length or offset is different than the original, you may change your
    bike's handling for the worse.

    Ted

    Or for the better.
    B

    (remove clothes to reply)

    Or, since the offset range of almost all carbon forks on the market is
    between 40 and 45 (most at 43), not noticably either way.

    Sure, but the relevant difference here is between the original fork and
    a new one. Does the OP know how much offset he now has?

    Ted

    --
    Ted Bennett
    Portland, OR

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.