Chris Eilbeck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:Quoted post said:Just as a test I've got a couple of AAA non-rechargeable batteries in
my GPS and when compared to the life of rechargeable ones they appear
to be lasting for absolutely ages....Any techies got an explanation?
Yeah, primary cells ie non-rechargeable ones hold more charge than
secondary, rechargeable ones. Nicads typically store 1/3-1/2 as much
as an alkaline, nimh store 1/2-2/3 as much as alkaline. Lithium cells
store is the best rechargeable technology but they still can't match
alkalines. They also have the drawback that they're best with low
current drains eg clocks, smoke alarms rather than high drains like
gpses and torches.
Mike Brock adds:
I've had four Duracell Pile Alkaline AA rechargeable batteries since I
bought my digi camera (Sony Cybershot 3.2) 3 years ago. I must have taken
over 20,000 pictures using the 4 batteries (alternated and recharged) and
they are still going strong. I'm very impressed as I'm sure I'd have gone
through loads of non-rechargeables on the use they have had. Not tried them
in my GPS as I stick to conventional non-rechargeables (Garmin Etrex
Summit). Would they work in the GPS as well as they do in the Camera?