Road Cycling · Public discussion

Oh please no

Started by psycholist · · Last activity · 28 posts · 634 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
21 January 2005
Last activity
29 January 2005
Original author
psycholist
Posts
28
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
634
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 28
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst has
    happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to get
    Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't anymore. I'm
    just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it and sick of reading
    Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever return to talking about
    racing?

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  2. "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst has
    happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to get
    Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't anymore.
    I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it and sick of
    reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever return to
    talking about racing?

    I feel your pain. You could just stop visiting rbr and all sites devoted to
    bicycle racing. Ask your wife or a friend to remove any pages in your
    cycling mags relating to drugs before you get them. .
    I'd suggest following Curling or Synchronized Swimming, but they have their
    drug scandals too.

  3. "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst has
    happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to get
    Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't anymore.
    I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it and sick of
    reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever return to
    talking about racing?

    I feel your pain. You could just stop visiting rbr and all sites devoted
    to bicycle racing. Ask your wife or a friend to remove any pages in your
    cycling mags relating to drugs before you get them. .
    I'd suggest following Curling or Synchronized Swimming, but they have
    their drug scandals too.

    I think instead I'll just killfile all the rumormongers and folks who revel
    in the titillating and the sensational. There won't be much left to read
    here, but so it goes. I don't know you, Brian, but I picture someone who
    buys most of his reading material at the checkout at the grocery store.
    Guess what ... Martha Steward didn't really have Bigfoot's love child.

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  4. "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst
    has happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to
    get Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't
    anymore. I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it and
    sick of reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever
    return to talking about racing?

    I feel your pain. You could just stop visiting rbr and all sites devoted
    to bicycle racing. Ask your wife or a friend to remove any pages in your
    cycling mags relating to drugs before you get them. .
    I'd suggest following Curling or Synchronized Swimming, but they have
    their drug scandals too.

    I think instead I'll just killfile all the rumormongers and folks who
    revel in the titillating and the sensational. There won't be much left to
    read here, but so it goes. I don't know you, Brian, but I picture someone
    who buys most of his reading material at the checkout at the grocery
    store.

    Only an occasional TV Guide. I do admit to reading the Enquirer when
    visting my mother because she does buy it at the supermarket.

    Quoted message said:

    Guess what ... Martha Steward didn't really have Bigfoot's love child.

    Damn. I didn't know that! BTW, did you see the headline on the Globe a
    year or so ago about the 101 year old woman who was impregnated by an alien.
    Apparently it was Pappy's love child.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  5. "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    > This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst
    > has happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to
    > get Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't
    > anymore. I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it
    > and sick of reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever
    > return to talking about racing?

    I feel your pain. You could just stop visiting rbr and all sites
    devoted to bicycle racing. Ask your wife or a friend to remove any
    pages in your cycling mags relating to drugs before you get them. .
    I'd suggest following Curling or Synchronized Swimming, but they have
    their drug scandals too.

    I think instead I'll just killfile all the rumormongers and folks who
    revel in the titillating and the sensational. There won't be much left
    to read here, but so it goes. I don't know you, Brian, but I picture
    someone who buys most of his reading material at the checkout at the
    grocery store.

    Only an occasional TV Guide. I do admit to reading the Enquirer when
    visting my mother because she does buy it at the supermarket.

    Quoted message said:

    Guess what ... Martha Steward didn't really have Bigfoot's love child.

    Damn. I didn't know that! BTW, did you see the headline on the Globe a
    year or so ago about the 101 year old woman who was impregnated by an
    alien. Apparently it was Pappy's love child.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

    OK ... now we've got it going. This is the kind of lively discussion rbr
    has been lacking. No, I didn't know about Pappy's alien love child.

    Sorry to bow out now, but actually get to go outside and ride for several
    hours. How wonderful!
    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  6. "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "B Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > "psycholist" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    >> This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst
    >> has happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to
    >> get Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't
    >> anymore. I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it
    >> and sick of reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever
    >> return to talking about racing?
    >
    > I feel your pain. You could just stop visiting rbr and all sites
    > devoted to bicycle racing. Ask your wife or a friend to remove any
    > pages in your cycling mags relating to drugs before you get them. .
    > I'd suggest following Curling or Synchronized Swimming, but they have
    > their drug scandals too.

    I think instead I'll just killfile all the rumormongers and folks who
    revel in the titillating and the sensational. There won't be much left
    to read here, but so it goes. I don't know you, Brian, but I picture
    someone who buys most of his reading material at the checkout at the
    grocery store.

    Only an occasional TV Guide. I do admit to reading the Enquirer when
    visting my mother because she does buy it at the supermarket.

    Quoted message said:

    Guess what ... Martha Steward didn't really have Bigfoot's love child.

    Damn. I didn't know that! BTW, did you see the headline on the Globe a
    year or so ago about the 101 year old woman who was impregnated by an
    alien. Apparently it was Pappy's love child.

    Quoted message said:


    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

    OK ... now we've got it going. This is the kind of lively discussion rbr
    has been lacking. No, I didn't know about Pappy's alien love child.

    Sorry to bow out now, but actually get to go outside and ride for several
    hours. How wonderful!

    Stay warm. It's really cold out there today.

  7. Quoted message said:

    Damn. I didn't know that! BTW, did you see the headline on the Globe a
    year or so ago about the 101 year old woman who was impregnated by an alien.
    Apparently it was Pappy's love child.

    Damn, there are aliens posting to this newsgroup. I would never have
    guessed.

  8. If we had it Laffertiti's way cycling would resort to the 1960s when
    the sport was pure, salaries were [censored], and only real men took
    amphetamines.

    That's what this numbskull Laugherty would prefer.

    Or maybe worse, the '40s or '50s when 20K/year went to top cyclists and
    competition was scant compared to today's pros where there are hundreds
    of super fit atheletes with better salaries and sponsors willing to pay
    them. Lafferty want to ruin that and return to the day of much lower
    overall competition and 5 speed bikes and no Americans in the peloton.
    -Ken

  9. psycholist said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring.

    So post something interesting.

    --
    Firefox Web Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
    Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/

  10. B Lafferty said:


    It's not about Tyler, Virenque, Millar or any of the numerous others

    Quoted message said:

    increasingly caught in the anti-drug net. Nor is it about me or any


    other

    Quoted message said:

    messenger. It's about highly paid sportsmen and women who are liars


    and

    Quoted message said:

    hypocrites.

    <snip>

    Dumbass -

    It isn't about sportsmen being drug users because it's all old news.
    Greed is good in Western culture and performance-enhancement=more$$$.

    So what is it about?
    It's about you and your lame-ass obsession. Boring.

    K. Gringioni.

  11. "k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If we had it Laffertiti's way cycling would resort to the 1960s when
    the sport was pure, salaries were [censored], and only real men took
    amphetamines.

    Pappy, you are of course aware that prior to the 1960s, drugs were not
    banned in cycling. There have been many discussions here and articles (good
    ones by Les Woodland in ProCycling) about all the concoctions used by the
    pros from the beginning of the sport. Most of those preparations were
    designed to allow riders to somply finish grueling events--like true 6 Day
    races. What changed in the 1990s was the introduction of much more
    sophiticated performance enhancers like EPO, HgH, Insulin for glycogen
    packing and now blood doping (the one, true pre-1960s performance enhancer).
    Les Woodland has a very good article on that in the current ProCycling.

    So, in a way it would be nice to go back to the status of the sport in the
    1940s and early to mid-1950s from a drug sense and see what the real effect
    of better training ethods (HR and Wattage training) would be. But the clock
    can't be turned back.

    Quoted message said:


    Or maybe worse, the '40s or '50s when 20K/year went to top cyclists and
    competition was scant compared to today's pros where there are hundreds
    of super fit atheletes with better salaries and sponsors willing to pay
    them.

    Back in the '40s or 50's, $20K went a long way. My parents house cost $20K
    in 1953. Recall also that in the '20s and '30s, cyclists in the US made as
    much or more money than baseball players. They were among the highest paid
    athletes in professional sport.

    Quoted message said:

    Lafferty want to ruin that and return to the day of much lower
    overall competition and 5 speed bikes and no Americans in the peloton.

    Not at all. If the present peloton were completely clean and riding with
    the current technology and modern training methods, I think you would see
    much more interesting races than the boring bunch finished that the Classics
    have too often become.

  12. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B Lafferty said:


    It's not about Tyler, Virenque, Millar or any of the numerous others

    Quoted message said:

    increasingly caught in the anti-drug net. Nor is it about me or any


    other

    Quoted message said:

    messenger. It's about highly paid sportsmen and women who are liars


    and

    Quoted message said:

    hypocrites.

    <snip>

    Dumbass -

    It isn't about sportsmen being drug users because it's all old news.
    Greed is good in Western culture and performance-enhancement=more$$$.

    So what is it about?
    It's about you and your lame-ass obsession. Boring.

    K. Gringioni.

    Then stop reading, Moron.

  13. psycholist said:
    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring.

    Ewoud Dronkert said:

    So post something interesting.

    Well we haven't had any [censored] from you in a long time.

  14. Ewoud Dronkert <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    So post something interesting.

    It's easier to curse the darkness.

  15. Ewoud Dronkert <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    So post something interesting.

    It's easier to curse the darkness.

  16. Tim Mullin said:

    Ewoud Dronkert <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So post something interesting.

    Quoted message said:

    It's easier to curse the darkness.

    Very well, here is one that ties into the 'flash sucks' tangent
    on the Paola Giacomelli thread.

    http://www.weebls-stuff.com/toons

    Off topic, but more interesting than watching the progression of
    Lafferty's obsessive/compulsive disorder.

    Bob Schwartz
    [email hidden]

    Note that I am not claiming that this site refutes the assertion
    that flash sucks.

  17. "psycholist" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This newsgroup has gotten so dead and boring. Now the absolute worst has
    happened ... new drug rumors and innuendo out of the frenchies to get
    Lafferty all riled up. I don't care if it's true or it isn't anymore.
    I'm just sick of reading about it, sick of hearing about it and sick of
    reading Lafferty's posts. Lord, when will this group ever return to
    talking about racing?

    --
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

    Maybe you think me a fool, but I imagine that Brian Lafferty is not only the
    bringer of the sad stories - I imagine that he is also troubled that they
    take up so much space. And they do, as he does no more than transmit his
    selection of original materials.

    Perhaps your double-termed president will give up the war on drugs overall ?
    Or is the answer in Brian's other line of thinking - let them go all drugged
    up and we'll learn about the efficacy of the pharmaceutical companies.

    Or the other approach, and get the hot-air blowers of UCI out of the
    testing, and let the police deal with illegal drug distribution, whether
    it's in athletics or just on the street.

    The drug issue is really a very small issue. The bigger one is whether
    bicycle racing remains something other than an advanced gladiator
    playground, like other spectator sports. I think that when athletes cease
    to serve as role models of achievment through personal efforts, you don't
    really have much left to look at, other than the battles - you can forget
    about the people.

    Please don't reply with an accusation that being french, I don't care about
    your six-time winner. I don't care much about most professional riders.
    But I do spend time (a little) in the cycling school, hoping that I am not
    too serious a threat to the moral norms we used to find in this sport.
    --
    Sandy
    Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

    *******

    La vie, c'est comme une bicyclette,
    il faut avancer pour ne pas perdre l'équilibre.
    -- Einstein, A.

  18. "k.papai" <[email hidden]> a écrit dans le message de :
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    If we had it Laffertiti's way cycling would resort to the 1960s when
    the sport was pure, salaries were [censored], and only real men took
    amphetamines.

    That's what this numbskull Laugherty would prefer.

    Or maybe worse, the '40s or '50s when 20K/year went to top cyclists and
    competition was scant compared to today's pros where there are hundreds
    of super fit atheletes with better salaries and sponsors willing to pay
    them. Lafferty want to ruin that and return to the day of much lower
    overall competition and 5 speed bikes and no Americans in the peloton.
    -Ken

    Do you occasionally read what you have written ? This is how you would like
    us to appreciate you and your contributions ?

    To answer (with irony - a clue to you, in particular) -

    Yeah, now we gotz lotza dopers who rides fastest evurrr. Just wait til I
    get the intravenous hooked up to the cycle computer, and I can buzz away at
    80 km/h all week long. Gimme lotza munny and I'll be your chimpanzee.
    --
    Bonne route,

    Sandy
    Verneuil-sur-Seine FR

  19. B Lafferty said:


    No excuse, Moron. You don't have to read what you don't want to


    read, even

    Quoted message said:

    on Google.

    Dumbass -

    Just like you have the right to waste a significant amount of your life
    obsessing w/ LANCE, I have the right to let you know how much of a
    loser you are.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

  20. "Kurgan Gringioni" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    B Lafferty said:


    No excuse, Moron. You don't have to read what you don't want to


    read, even

    Quoted message said:

    on Google.

    Dumbass -

    Just like you have the right to waste a significant amount of your life
    obsessing w/ LANCE, I have the right to let you know how much of a
    loser you are.

    thanks,

    K. Gringioni.

    That's fine, moron. Just stop whining about reading my posts when it's
    clearly your voluntary decision to do so.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.