Switch from Solid to Full Suspension Bike

"Ross" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?

I still have my 13 year old fully rigid mtb, it feels fast on the road <1>
and lively off-road, however an hour off-road is as long as I'd want to
spend on it nowadays.
It was replaced with a full suss bike some years ago as my primary mtb. The
full susser is pointless on the road except for the neccessity to link
off-road trails but I can, and do, ride it for hours on end off-road (5.5
hours today in fact) on very technical terrain without undue discomfort.
Horses for courses.
Unfortunately, sale bikes aside, you need to spend 1000 pounds upward to get
an efficient and reasonably light full suss bike.
<1> Currently set up as a winter road bike, a role it fills admirably).

Pete

Ross said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,
Ross

Depends what you got for a full suspension bike. The Rockhopper is a
very good bike for its price. On suspension bikes you need to spend a
quite a bit to get something reasonable. With low price suspension
bikes it can sap a lot of energy not least because putting the money
into the suspension means having to make lots of savings elsewhere plus
cheap suspension tends to be underdamped and boingy.

Check the usual thing though - brakes not rubbing, tyres pumped up etc -
just in case.

Tony

"Ross" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,

Don't get rid of the 'hopper. Bloody good bikes.

T

(Ross) said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,
Ross

Which bike is it? Also does it have adjustment on the front and rear
shocks if so try setting them to as stiff as possible. Normally a
clockwise adjustment on front shocks and if there are two adjusters
you'll need to do both by the same amount. The rear shock is normally
adjustable on all bikes that have them even the very cheapest models.
Set this to as stiff as possible for road use. Also change the tyres
to slicks if your not going off road.

in message <[email hidden]>, Ross

(') said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?

Full suspension bikes are obviously and necessarily a little heavier
than rigid bikes of similar age and quality, but not very much -
perhaps 2Kg over all at most. The riding technique is a little
different. Don't get out of the saddle and honk - the suspension will
just bob and you'll lose traction. Stay sat down, get into silly low
gears, and spin like mad. When on firm, even surfaces like tarmac, it
often helps to lock the suspension.

You don't say what your new bike is or what it weighs but it should not
be much heavier. Broadly a good full suspension cross-country bike
shouldn't weigh more than 13Kg ('freeride' bikes may weigh a bit more
and downhill bikes may weigh a lot more).

In my experience full suspension is just amazingly better than rigid -
not only is it much easier particularly on longer rides, but you can
easily go places which on a rigid you just could not ride.

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

to err is human, to lisp divine
;; attributed to Kim Philby, oddly enough.

Ross said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,
Ross

It sounds quite possible that a well-meaning person has
"upgraded" you from a high-quality lightweight rigid bike to a cheap
heavy suspended horror story. However, it may just be that you are not
used to the slightly softer ride and the new bike is not well set up (or
just not suitable for your use). What is the make and model of new bike?

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

In news:[email hidden],
James Annan <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

Ross said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,

It sounds quite possible that a well-meaning person has
"upgraded" you from a high-quality lightweight rigid bike to a cheap
heavy suspended horror story.

I'm afraid that's exactly what it sounds like to me, too. My full suspension
mountain bike is plenty more fun to ride on dry roads in daytime than my
mid-market urban bike. Of course, put a bit of rain into the equation, or
darkness, or locking it up, and it changes, but it sounds like something's
wrong if it doesn't at least feel a bit fun. I'd be wondering how to
tactfully arrange a refund and exchange it for something like some forks for
the Rockhopper if you've still got it, if I were you.

Sorry, I don't like to bring bad news, but it's what it sounds like to me,

Ambrose

"Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

in message <[email hidden]>, Ross

(') said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?

Full suspension bikes are obviously and necessarily a little heavier
than rigid bikes of similar age and quality, but not very much -
perhaps 2Kg over all at most. The riding technique is a little
different. Don't get out of the saddle and honk - the suspension will
just bob and you'll lose traction. Stay sat down, get into silly low
gears, and spin like mad. When on firm, even surfaces like tarmac, it
often helps to lock the suspension.

You don't say what your new bike is or what it weighs but it should not
be much heavier. Broadly a good full suspension cross-country bike
shouldn't weigh more than 13Kg ('freeride' bikes may weigh a bit more
and downhill bikes may weigh a lot more).

In my experience full suspension is just amazingly better than rigid -
not only is it much easier particularly on longer rides

Agreed

Quoted message said:

but you can
easily go places which on a rigid you just could not ride.

Disagree strongly. Where are these places? It may take more skill but theres
no-where a full-sus bike can go that a rigid can't follow. If you managed to
catch Steve Peat win the 1996 National mtb DH championship on a rigid bike
( when everyone else was on full-susssers or hardtails) you would appreciate
how fast you can go too.

Steve.

--

---------------------------------------------------------------------
"Are you still wasting your time with spam?...
There is a solution!"

Protected by GIANT Company's Spam Inspector
The most powerful anti-spam software available.
http://mail.spaminspector.com

"Ambrose Nankivell" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In news:[email hidden],
James Annan <[email hidden]> typed:

Quoted message said:

Ross said:

Hi there all,
I'm just an amateur, occasional cyclist, but enjoy it all the same. I
used to have an old Specialized Rockhopper, with a completely solid
frame. It was incredibly light, and very fast and easy to ride. At
Christmas I received a full suspension mountain bike, which although
it has an aluminium frame, is a lot heavier, and imo much much harder
to ride. Although it is more comfortable, it takes a hell of a lot
more work for the same effect.
Has anyone else found this when making the switch from solid to
suspension bikes, or have I not set it up right?
Any opinions appreciated,

I have bothtypes of bike like you.
I use my non sprung bike for the road and my dual susser for off
road....................Its horses for courses.
I used to go off road with my non sussed bike and though I got through I was
more knackered and hurt more.
Off road the full susser is a delight......on the contrary on road the
susser absorbs a lot of energy that I guess would otherwise propel you
forward.Who needs all that cushioning on the road>>?....that's my take on
your question.

Barry

BARRY said:

Off road the full susser is a delight......on the contrary on road the
susser absorbs a lot of energy that I guess would otherwise propel you
forward.Who needs all that cushioning on the road>>?....that's my take on
your question.

It needn't. First it suspension movement doesn't mean you lose energy.
Whatever goes into compressing the suspension is returned minus the
minor losses when it uncompresses. Also many forks and some shocks have
lock outs for road/climbing use and a good rear shock like the Fifth
Element will not bob anyway on the road if set up correctly.

Tony

Tony Raven said:

BARRY said:

Off road the full susser is a delight......on the contrary on road the
susser absorbs a lot of energy that I guess would otherwise propel you
forward.Who needs all that cushioning on the road>>?....that's my take
on your question.

It needn't. First it suspension movement doesn't mean you lose energy.
Whatever goes into compressing the suspension is returned minus the
minor losses when it uncompresses.

Um...all that sophisticated damping had better do a lot more than "minor
losses". Also, I suspect in practice there is likely to be biomechanical
inefficiency eating up the returned energy, even if in principle the
rider ought to be able to avoid this.

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

in message <[email hidden]>, spademan o---[) *

(') said:

"Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

In my experience full suspension is just amazingly better than rigid
- not only is it much easier particularly on longer rides

Agreed

Quoted message said:

but you can
easily go places which on a rigid you just could not ride.

Disagree strongly. Where are these places? It may take more skill but
theres no-where a full-sus bike can go that a rigid can't follow.

Let's rephrase that: for any given skill level, there will be places you
can go on a full suspension bike that you could not go on a rigid.
Agreed that someone a lot better than you probably will be able to take
a rigid there, but (s)he could take a full suspension bike to places
you would not even believe a bike could go.

--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

[ This .sig subject to change without notice ]

"Simon Brooke" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

in message <[email hidden]>, spademan o---[) *
([email hidden]'😉 wrote:
Let's rephrase that: for any given skill level, there will be places you
can go on a full suspension bike that you could not go on a rigid.
Agreed that someone a lot better than you probably will be able to take
a rigid there, but (s)he could take a full suspension bike to places
you would not even believe a bike could go.

True, I find there are sections that I'm far more confident to tackle with
full suss.
In fact just replacing my front suss fork to one with another 30mm of travel
a year ago boosted my confidence, as verified by my riding companions.
And if there is a gnarly downhill near the end of a long ride not only
will you be in a better physical state to tackle it but the suspenion will
be more forgiving on the actual descent.
There will always be people who can knock spots off me riding a Raleigh
Roadster but that's irrelelevent to my situation.

Pete

"James Annan" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

Tony Raven said:

BARRY said:

Off road the full susser is a delight......on the contrary on road the
susser absorbs a lot of energy that I guess would otherwise propel you
forward.Who needs all that cushioning on the road>>?....that's my take
on your question.

It needn't. First it suspension movement doesn't mean you lose energy.
Whatever goes into compressing the suspension is returned minus the
minor losses when it uncompresses.

Um...all that sophisticated damping had better do a lot more than "minor
losses". Also, I suspect in practice there is likely to be biomechanical
inefficiency eating up the returned energy, even if in principle the
rider ought to be able to avoid this.

I tried a full susser with front and rear lock-out climbing on a fire road
in Afan forest yesterday, it was noticably easier than my very similar bike
with no lock out that I'd just swapped it for.
It's definately the way I'd go given the money, certainly when my rear shock
gives up it'll be replaced with a lock out version.

Pete

Pete