Quoted message said:My cycling's pretty much 100% commuting, about 50Ks a day.
Just commuting? 50k x 5 days a week is damn impressive.
I use a HRM
Quoted message said:to keep me honest. It's amazing how quickly I end up coasting at 120bpm
if I don't use one.
So given I ride pretty fixed routes and while I want to get faster I'm
not a competitive cyclist, is a cycling computer worth anything to me?
What are the benefits?
100% agree with what all the other posters say, especially how odometer
readings give you objective info, rather than just "feel" and visual
cues, about whether you need to replace your tyres and running gear.
Plus:
- Time, distance (especially combined with a HRM - guessing, since I
don't have one) and to a lesser extent average speed is useful for
telling you how much of a workout you are doing/have done;
- Cadence is useful to know about, tells you how your "form" is,
especially when you're getting tired - switch off the "speed" display
and just aim to keep at your good non-tired rpm;
- Speed (especially max (but not Rod) speed) is always fun to know, and
will-give you a gee-up if you have an attack of lazy-itis; also, when
you're cornering it's useful to know exactly how fast you are going
rather than relying on feel.
Another commuter's 5c worth.
p - aka fn - d