UK and Europe · Public discussion

From CTC NewsNet

Started by Just zis Guy, you know? · · Last activity · 1 post · 590 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
24 December 2004
Last activity
24 December 2004
Original author
Just zis Guy, you know?
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
590
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Safer cycling
    =============

    CTC has joined forces with 28 other road safety, community, health and
    environmental organisations under the banner of the 'Safer Streets
    Coalition' (SSC), to call for a number of amendments to the
    Government’s Road Safety Bill. The issue which most concerns SSC
    member organisations is the proposal to lower the penalty for
    ‘marginally’ exceeding the speed limit from 3 points to 2 points –
    even though ‘marginal’ could mean driving at 39mph in a 30mph
    area.  It is ironic that the first full-blown Road Safety Bill since
    1967 could actually increase (rather than reduce) deaths and serious
    injuries on our roads. CTC is urging members to contact their MPs,
    urging them to support the Safer Streets Coalition’s proposals. The
    Bill has its second reading debate on January 11th. Many MPs will be
    having constituency surgeries in the meantime.  Click here for further
    information on the Bill (by all means draw on this text when writing
    to your MP), and a link to the Safer Streets Coalition’s briefing on
    the Bill.  You can contact your MP (and if need be find out his/her
    name) via www.faxyourmp.com.  Please let adam dot coffman at ctc dot
    org dot uk know of any responses.

    CTC's page on the Bill is here:
    http://www.ctc.org.uk/DesktopDefault.aspx?TabID=3701

    The date has been moved forward - probably a sign of decks being
    cleared for a May election. The Government and DfT in particular are
    keen for this Bill to go through, so contentious issues will be
    avoided. If it is made clear that reducing the penalty for speeding
    in precisely the circumstances where the risk posed to others is
    greatest /is/ contentious, and amendment may be forthcoming. That's
    what i think this proposal does - at 30mph half of pedestrians will
    survive being hit, at 39mph around 95% will die. It seems to me that
    there is ample justification for increasing penalties for greater
    margins over the limit, introducing a sense of proportionality, but to
    give a nod and a wink to those driving a third over the limit in 30
    limits is simply foolish.

    On a personal note, Adam Coffman is a good guy. I think he used to
    work for Bob Davis and I bear him no malice for getting a job I
    applied for :-)

    Guy
    --
    "then came ye chavves, theyre cartes girded wyth candels
    blue, and theyre beastes wyth straynge horn-lyke thyngs
    onn theyre arses that theyre fartes be herde from myles
    around." Chaucer, the Sheppey Tales

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.