Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Shoe Sizing Experience

Started by Dawgwalker · · Last activity · 21 posts · 800 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
21 December 2004
Last activity
24 December 2004
Original author
Dawgwalker
Posts
21
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
800
Views / 30 days
3

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–20 of 21
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be little
    standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the brand but not
    brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?

  2. Dawgwalker said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be
    little standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the
    brand but not brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?


    Even within brands, sizing is not necessarily consistent. Shoes are one
    thing that I will *not* buy online. Too big a risk.

  3. "Dawgwalker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be little
    standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the brand but not
    brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?

    A size 43 Sidi Genius for 2004 isn't the same as a size 43 Genius Sidi
    Genius from 3 or 4 years ago. My foot's the same (I measured). The shoe
    isn't.

    -
    Bob C.

    "Of course it hurts. The trick is not minding that it hurts."
    T. E. Lawrence (of Arabia)

  4. "Dawgwalker" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:hUXxd.5782$Z47.516
    @newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net:

    Quoted message said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be little
    standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the brand but not
    brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    You need to try them on. Different brands are shaped differently. Some are
    longer. Some are wider. Some are taller in the toe or arch area.
    Traditionally, Italian shoes were longer and narrower than US shoes, but over
    the years Italian companies have adapted their sizing for American fat feet.

  5. "Dawgwalker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be little
    standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the brand but not
    brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?


    Order several shoes in different sizes and return the ones that don't fit.
    Only wear on the carpet. The mail order houses are used to people trying on
    and returning shoes. IME shops find shoes to be a hassle and can not
    effectively stock them. Return freight is the cost of getting a shoe that
    fits. Pretend it is the sales tax you are probably not going to pay.
    Bill

  6. Dawgwalker said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be
    little standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the
    brand but not brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?

    Go to the LBS and try them all on first! Seriously, you can't mess around with
    these. If you're going online to save money, it's not worth the trouble. Good
    quality bike shoes amortize so well that the cost shouldn't be an issue. I'd go
    to the LBS, try them all on, and pay whatever they're asking.

    My Sidis are 10 years old, and have at least 50,000 miles on them, plus plenty
    of gravelly hike-a-bike. I got them on sale for less than $100, but if I had
    paid $300 it would have been well worth it. OTOH, I went through several pair
    of cheaper shoes in a short time before buying the Sidis. This is one place
    worth spending some money.

    Matt O.

  7. Dawgwalker said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be


    little

    Quoted message said:

    standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the brand but


    not

    Quoted message said:

    brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?

    I have similar experiences to the others. I bought my first pair of
    Carnac shoes from a local shop back in 1998. It was wonderful having a
    good fitting shoe. Then I mail ordered the same size but different
    model of Carnac the following year. Also great fit. Just last month I
    mail ordered the same size Carnac but different model. The new shoe
    was narrower than my old Carnac shoes. I tested it on the carpet and
    sent it back. If I don't know the exact size, then I mail order
    several sizes and send the non fitting ones back. Its not the cheapest
    method, but it does allow you to find shoes not carried by bike shops.
    In the past decade I have only found one shop that carried Carnac. And
    they only had about 3 road shoe models. Sidi, Specialized, Nike,
    Shimano shoes are as common as trash on the road.

  8. Matt O'Toole said:
    Dawgwalker said:

    I've bought several pairs of cycling shoes and there seems to be
    little standardization of sizing. Sizing may be consistent by the
    brand but not brand to brand. Some shoes are narrower than others.

    Carnac width is generous.

    I've found Specialized to run large and Nike to run small.

    Anyone else had experiences similar?

    If you've bought online how do you choose sizes?

    Go to the LBS and try them all on first! Seriously, you can't mess


    around with

    Quoted message said:

    these. If you're going online to save money, it's not worth the


    trouble. Good

    Quoted message said:

    quality bike shoes amortize so well that the cost shouldn't be an


    issue. I'd go

    Quoted message said:

    to the LBS, try them all on, and pay whatever they're asking.

    My Sidis are 10 years old, and have at least 50,000 miles on them,


    plus plenty

    Quoted message said:

    of gravelly hike-a-bike. I got them on sale for less than $100, but


    if I had

    Quoted message said:

    paid $300 it would have been well worth it. OTOH, I went through


    several pair

    Quoted message said:

    of cheaper shoes in a short time before buying the Sidis. This is


    one place

    Quoted message said:

    worth spending some money.

    Matt O.

    I do not wear Sidi shoes. I will never wear Sidi shoes. The regular
    shoe is much too narrow for normal feet. The Mega models are much too
    wide for normal feet. They are also made entirely of plastic. I've
    never been fond of plastic shoes. I prefer leather on my shoes.

    This odd concept proposed by many people to buy shoes from the local
    shop and try them on does not work. Unless you wear Nike, Sidi,
    Specialized, or Shimano shoes, you cannot try on shoes at your local
    bike shop. These are the only shoe brands carried by about 99% of the
    bike shops. And even then they only carry about 1/4 of the models sold
    by these companies.

    Mail order is the only place to find any and all shoe models sold by
    any and all shoe makers.

  9. Quoted message said:

    From: russellseaton

    Quoted message said:

    I do not wear Sidi shoes. I will never wear Sidi shoes. The regular
    shoe is much too narrow for normal feet.

    Maybe they don't fit *your* normal feet. They fit *my* normal feet just fine.
    Peachy.

    Quoted message said:

    The Mega models are much too
    wide for normal feet.

    My normal heels pulled out of the Megas, but the regular Genius III's and IV's
    in a half-size are comfy.

    Quoted message said:

    They are also made entirely of plastic. I've
    never been fond of plastic shoes. I prefer leather on my shoes.

    On "street shoes", maybe. Lorica works great for riding shoes. Great wear
    resistance and no problems dealing with shrinkage and deterioration as with wet
    leather shoes. The Sidi buckle (III's, IV's) is super, again IME.

    Quoted message said:

    This odd concept proposed by many people to buy shoes from the local
    shop and try them on does not work.

    Maybe it didn't work for odd you. It worked for odd me.

    Quoted message said:

    Unless you wear Nike, Sidi,
    Specialized, or Shimano shoes, you cannot try on shoes at your local
    bike shop. These are the only shoe brands carried by about 99% of the
    bike shops.

    Reflecting a total for all brands of shoes sold...??? Maybe not 99%, but
    begging the question: "What brand did you want?"

    Quoted message said:

    Mail order is the only place to find any and all shoe models sold by
    any and all shoe makers.

    Luckily my research was brief. --TP

  10. Tom Paterson said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: russellseaton

    Quoted message said:

    I do not wear Sidi shoes. I will never wear Sidi shoes. The


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    shoe is much too narrow for normal feet.

    Maybe they don't fit *your* normal feet. They fit *my* normal feet


    just fine.

    Quoted message said:

    Peachy.

    If you do a search on this very forum you will find about 99% of the
    people describe Sidi regular shoes as narrow. But you think the Sidi
    shoes fit your normal feet. Obviously your opinion of the width of
    Sidi shoes differ from the other 99% of people on this forum. I'd say
    you have narrow feet, not normal width feet.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    The Mega models are much too
    wide for normal feet.

    My normal heels pulled out of the Megas, but the regular Genius III's


    and IV's

    Quoted message said:

    in a half-size are comfy.

    Someone with narrow feet probably would pull out of the wide Mega shoes
    and fit the regular Sidis. Regular Sidis are narrow shoes.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    They are also made entirely of plastic. I've
    never been fond of plastic shoes. I prefer leather on my shoes.

    On "street shoes", maybe. Lorica works great for riding shoes. Great


    wear

    Quoted message said:

    resistance and no problems dealing with shrinkage and deterioration


    as with wet

    Quoted message said:

    leather shoes. The Sidi buckle (III's, IV's) is super, again IME.

    Quoted message said:

    This odd concept proposed by many people to buy shoes from the local
    shop and try them on does not work.

    Maybe it didn't work for odd you. It worked for odd me.

    Quoted message said:

    Unless you wear Nike, Sidi,
    Specialized, or Shimano shoes, you cannot try on shoes at your local
    bike shop. These are the only shoe brands carried by about 99% of


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    bike shops.

    Reflecting a total for all brands of shoes sold...??? Maybe not 99%,


    but

    Quoted message said:

    begging the question: "What brand did you want?"

    Carnac of course. The best shoes. As I stated above, almost every
    bike shop around carries one or more of the following brands: Sidi,
    Nike, Specialized, or Shimano. Almost nothing else is carried by bike
    shops. If you do not like one of those brands, you cannot buy shoes
    locally at your bike shop. Period. Very similar to the prevalence of
    Trek, Giant, Specialized, Cannondale dealers in the US. Numerous
    people talk about taking a bike for test ride before buying it and
    buying a bike locally and having them fit it to you. If you do not
    want one of the above four brands of bikes, this may not be possible
    without a considerable search or drive. The local bike shops do a very
    good job of limiting your choice to one of four shoe brands and one of
    four bike brands.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Mail order is the only place to find any and all shoe models sold by
    any and all shoe makers.

    Luckily my research was brief. --TP

    Please describe the number of bike shops in your area of the country
    and all of the brands of shoes they carry. Sidi apparently. What else?

  11. From: russellseaton

    Quoted message said:

    I'd say
    you have narrow feet, not normal width >feet.

    Mine measure out EEE or more on the usual plate-style measuring devices:

    <http://www.abctarget.com/index.php?page=show_prod&prodnum=676&s=GoogleAdW
    ordsSearch&kw=measuring+shoe+size>

    common to all shoe stores. I'd guess yours (feet) are wider and/or more
    voluminous than mine somehow, if Sidi's feel "narrow", esp. in a half size.
    Repeating that I happily used the "narrower" Sidi even size until middle age
    spread spread to the feet, too.

    [What brand RS was looking for]

    Quoted message said:

    Carnac of course. The best shoes.

    "Only if they fit". Citation on the "best"?

    Quoted message said:

    The local bike shops do a very
    good job of limiting your choice to one of four shoe brands and one of
    four bike brands.

    Where I live, the bike trade supports a pretty wide choice of products.

    Quoted message said:

    Please describe the number of bike shops in your area of the country
    and all of the brands of shoes they carry. > Sidi apparently. What else?

    Hmmm, Freewheeling, Nelo's Pro Shop, Bicycle Sport Shop, Cycle 360 I guess
    would be the most pertinent ones here in Austin. Houston, where we lived for a
    few years, also had at least four pro shops that offered a large variety of
    frames and bikes (and shoes, Carnac incl.). I haven't seen them here but then
    I'm not looking to change brands. --TP

  12. Quoted message said:

    If you do a search on this very forum you will find about 99% of the
    people describe Sidi regular shoes as narrow. But you think the Sidi
    shoes fit your normal feet. Obviously your opinion of the width of
    Sidi shoes differ from the other 99% of people on this forum. I'd say
    you have narrow feet, not normal width feet.


    Well, then I must be part of that 1% who find the regular Sidi fits my
    normal sized foot. I went from a pair of Pearl Izumi Vortex to a pair
    of Sidi Genuis 4 and they work great for me.
    I bought mine mail order and got a good deal on them.
    Shoes are like a lot of things, what works for me, might not work for
    you.

    I don't know where you are getting this 99% figure though? I have been
    around long enough that I would know if my feet were narrow.

    Life is Good!
    Jeff

  13. Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    From: russellseaton
    I do not wear Sidi shoes. I will never wear Sidi shoes. The


    regular

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    shoe is much too narrow for normal feet.

    Quoted message said:
    Tom Paterson said:

    Maybe they don't fit *your* normal feet. They fit *my* normal feet


    just fine.

    Quoted message said:

    If you do a search on this very forum you will find about 99% of the
    people describe Sidi regular shoes as narrow. But you think the Sidi
    shoes fit your normal feet. Obviously your opinion of the width of
    Sidi shoes differ from the other 99% of people on this forum. I'd say
    you have narrow feet, not normal width feet.

    Yes it is relative of course.

    For years my Italian feet fit SiDis perfectly. Now I use
    the women's model SiDi. Their 'medium'

    is wider than it
    once was.

    How much is too much? I have no idea.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    www.yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

  14. From: A Muzi:

    Quoted message said:

    For years my Italian feet fit SiDis perfectly. Now I use
    the women's model SiDi. Their
    'medium'

    is wider than it
    once was.

    (I tried to reproduce the EEEE spacing of your post as it appeared on my AwOL
    screen)

    I go back to 1980 with those leather Ti Sidi's, three-bolt white cleat. I was a
    10-1/2 D width back then. Size 44 worked great. Bought in a bike store (memory
    fails on the name) in Boulder, Co., the *second* pair tried for fit. (Detto
    Pietro's were a no-go, BTW. Comedic possibilities: very, very long shoes with
    sufficient width for my normal, non-Italian feet).

    "Width", a many-splendored thing. --TP

  15. Tom Paterson said:

    From: russellseaton

    Quoted message said:

    I'd say
    you have narrow feet, not normal width >feet.

    Mine measure out EEE or more on the usual plate-style measuring


    devices:

    It seems odd you and Mr. Starr below consider your feet normal width or
    EEE width and think the Sidi shoes fit. Do a search on this forum
    using Sidi and narrow and you will return many, many posts all saying
    the same thing. Sidi shoes are narrow. And such was my experience a
    few years ago when I tried a pair on at a bike shop. Much too narrow.

    Quoted message said:



    <http://www.abctarget.com/index.php?page=show_prod&prodnum=676&s=GoogleAdW

    Quoted message said:

    ordsSearch&kw=measuring+shoe+size>

    common to all shoe stores. I'd guess yours (feet) are wider and/or


    more

    Quoted message said:

    voluminous than mine somehow, if Sidi's feel "narrow", esp. in a half


    size.

    Quoted message said:

    Repeating that I happily used the "narrower" Sidi even size until


    middle age

    Quoted message said:

    spread spread to the feet, too.

    [What brand RS was looking for]

    Quoted message said:

    Carnac of course. The best shoes.

    "Only if they fit". Citation on the "best"?

    Quoted message said:

    The local bike shops do a very
    good job of limiting your choice to one of four shoe brands and one


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    four bike brands.

    Where I live, the bike trade supports a pretty wide choice of


    products.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Please describe the number of bike shops in your area of the country
    and all of the brands of shoes they carry. > Sidi apparently. What


    else?

    Quoted message said:


    Hmmm, Freewheeling, Nelo's Pro Shop, Bicycle Sport Shop, Cycle 360 I


    guess

    Quoted message said:

    would be the most pertinent ones here in Austin. Houston, where we


    lived for a

    Quoted message said:

    few years, also had at least four pro shops that offered a large


    variety of

    Quoted message said:

    frames and bikes (and shoes, Carnac incl.). I haven't seen them here


    but then

    Quoted message said:

    I'm not looking to change brands. --TP

    Austin has about 1 million people more or less. Houston has about 2
    million people more or less. Not exactly your average size US town.
    And I bet in Houston and Austin almost all of the bike shops carry
    several of the four brands I listed. So even in two of the more
    populous cities in the US, the shoe choices are extremely limited.

  16. From: russellseaton

    Quoted message said:

    And such was my experience a
    few years ago when I tried a pair on at a >bike shop. Much too narrow.

    The full size (even number) are narrower than the half sizes. I wear a half
    size. My feet are beat up (and one operated on) to the point where I can't wear
    most street shoes without strong discomfort. Sidi in 45-1/2, both Genius III
    and IV, work fine, for hours. "I'd know if they didn't". Since Carnacs have the
    rep of being "wide", if my spreading continues I may have to switch, since my
    heels will probably pull out of Sidi Megas. "Brand loyalty" is fickle around
    here.

    Quoted message said:

    Austin has about 1 million people more or less. Houston has about 2
    million people more or less. Not exactly your average size US town.
    And I bet in Houston and Austin almost all of the bike shops carry
    several of the four brands I listed. So even in two of the more
    populous cities in the US, the shoe choices are extremely limited.

    Well damn, Russell. The shops have to carry stuff they can sell. If it's Big
    Four, that's it. I did see Carnacs at Boone's in Houston approx. three years
    ago, along with a couple of Sevens, Merckx, Ciocc, and several other frame
    brands. What can I say, you seem to be happy with MO in the first place, so
    what is the problem? I'll still go with buying at least the first pair of a
    given shoe in a shop, because as evidenced by all the slightly used shoes on
    sale on ebay and elsewhere, many plans to save money by MO'ing hit a snag. --TP

  17. Jeff Starr said:

    Well, then I must be part of that 1% who find the regular Sidi fits my
    normal sized foot. I went from a pair of Pearl Izumi Vortex to a pair
    of Sidi Genuis 4 and they work great for me.
    I bought mine mail order and got a good deal on them.
    Shoes are like a lot of things, what works for me, might not work for
    you.

    I don't know where you are getting this 99% figure though? I have been
    around long enough that I would know if my feet were narrow.

    I second that. If anything my feet are on the wide side - and my
    currrent SIDI Genius IV's fit perfectly.

    Anders,
    Denmark
    - who's been riding Adidas (black Eddy Merckx's with laces and nail-on
    cleats and later the grey/yellow/green with adjustable (twin) cleats),
    SIDI (3 pairs incl current), Shimano, Gaerne, Brancale, Carnac, Time
    (2), Diadora (2) and Northwave shoes from 1981-2004. The list doesn't
    include my very first real cycling shoes, a long gone french brand,
    forgot the name.
    No, I'm not the Imelda Marcos of cycling .......

  18. AB/9000 said:

    a long gone french brand,
    forgot the name.

    Le Coq Sportif? That was my first pair. Nail-on cleats, perforated
    leather, and long laces. I might still have them in my big
    box-O-bike-junk. I remember putting them on in the shower so they would
    shrink to fit my feet when they dried. Turned all my socks black though.

    Count me in the 1% also - Sidis fit great and my feet are not narrow.

    --
    My bike blog:
    http://diabloscott.blogspot.com/

  19. <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I do not wear Sidi shoes. I will never wear Sidi shoes. The regular
    shoe is much too narrow for normal feet. The Mega models are much too
    wide for normal feet. They are also made entirely of plastic. I've
    never been fond of plastic shoes. I prefer leather on my shoes.

    Hmmmm. I have both the regular & the "mega" shoes in the same size (52,
    yikes!). Maybe I'm not too picky. The normals fit like a glove, the megas
    fit like a mitten. I just put an extra insole into the megas for riding in
    the warm weather (they're my ultra-cycling shoes) and wear thicker socks in
    the winter. I love that they're plastic, since they have been soaked so
    many times that if they were leather they'd be ruined. Of course I wish the
    size 50 that a sales-droid talked me into buying *were* leather because
    then they might have stretched enough that I could wear them without my
    toenails falling off.

  20. From: "Peter Cole"

    Quoted message said:

    Of course I wish the
    size 50 that a sales-droid talked me into buying *were* leather because
    then they might have stretched enough that I could wear them without my
    toenails falling off.

    All kidding aside, you may have much worse problems than "nails falling off" if
    you wear too-short shoes. That would be "bone spurs".

    That's one thing I really like about the Sidis. I can run the toe box nice and
    loose, and control fore-aft movement with the buckle, preventing the toe from
    hitting the inside end of the shoe. Even after "surgical correction" (not
    complete), contact is still painful. Works great and so much for the "snug
    shoes for power transmission" myth. It's bull. I only wish I'd wised up a lot
    sooner. --TP

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.