Ed,
You really are predictably foolish. LIke most of your Johnny NoCom
postings are anything but cycling related? I would seem that
uncorroborated assertions are your specialty. Allow me to refresh your
feeble memory. We were both temporarily tossed into what the moderator
of HPV List (Brian Wilson) fondly called HPV Jail because you ported
our flame war over to that forum and I responded by apologizing to the
readership for your breach of netiquette and indicated that I had no
intention of posting any further. If you recall, you were still
cooling your heals when Brian released me. You were so [censored] for
having your hands slapped that you never posted there again. As
concerns the other forum you referred to, you must have been talking to
yourself (the only person that takes you seriously). Ed-Von
Diesel-Gin, you were the forum's moderator (ModRatorMan) of the now
defunct Monkey Island forum to which you refer. You never prevented me
from posting there. I just kept you busy deleting my postings until I
got bored and lost interest in toying with you. Now that you have been
drawn out (you fell for it fool) using a alias fro the past, perhaps
our cyber detective (Joao de Souza) would care to put his skill to work
and check out the email headers for Von Diesel or any of your other
sock puppet pseudonyms in the flame war thread. In another post Johnny
NoCom wrote ... "Jimmymac, the buffon obviously can't ignore me as
evidenced by his reply." This is a common complaint of Ed Gin, but
Johnny NoCom is not Ed Gin ... yeah right! As concerns another post,
Johnny NoCom wrote... "...Jimmymac perched atop his Preparation H
greased pole up the ass sitting on a slither of leather tending to a
nosebleed." Few people know that I ride both a recumbent and an
upright (Johnny NoCOm and Ed Gin do ... coincidence?), what both Johnny
NoCom call an upwrong .c. coincidence? As concerns the [censored] about
the virus, anyone can read through those old posts. They're still
there. If they do, they'll certainly find that you made such an
accusation but nowhere will they find an admission that I did. What
they will find is my denial. I challenged you to substantiate your
accusation back then. You couldn't provide proof then and you still
can't. In making an accusation, the burden of proof rest with the
accuser. No matter what kind of spin the accuser vainly attempts to
put on something, the fact remains that an uncorroborated assertion
does not a fact make ... and, THAT'S A FACT!!!
Ed-Johnny NoCON-Gin, as concerns your thinly veiled threat to dredge up
old archival flame war material and post it here, give me time to work
up a tremble. I've been down this road so many times before that the
"cyber-pavement" is furrowed. I'd prefer not to devote much more of my
time and energy to a man so utterly undeserving of either. For those
of you unfamiliar with our history, Ed and I were once friends, but
split company. Since that time, we have bitterly engaged one another
all too many times in various internet forums. Suffice it to say that
Ed's acrimonious campaign of vile and vituperative vilification (often
via sock puppet pseudonyms) is so relentlessly inane, that his fatuous
drivel is about as entertaining a read as is the Congressional Record.
Ed is a sanctimonious purveyor of incipient poppycock and his
capacious, duplicitous drool is as legendary as he himself yearns to
be. Indecorous and undeterred by rationality, Ed may forge yet another
vacuous onslaught of ignominious, derisive commentary mired in
hypocrisy and replete with uncorroborated assertions. Tis the nature
of an ultracrepidarian. Frankly, I prefer that the timeworn grist not
be put through the mill again. That having been said, I would like to
add the following. Understand that Ed - the self-righteous (GOD-LIKE
by his own admission) - Gin's twisted psyche is comprised of a complex
mix of inextricably intertwined elements of perceptual distortion.
Don't be misled. The nefarious "Head" Gin exudes weapons grade
megalomania deceptively cloaked in the guise of altruistic sincerity.
A notorious, disingenuous egomaniac, Ed is held hostage by an
unrestrained and enormously distended sense of self-importance. He is
consumed by an abiding sense of self-indulgence. Self-absorbed and
self-serving, Ed is possessed by a shameless obsession for
self-aggrandizement and a compulsion for denigration of those who would
profanely dare to challenge him. When his inflamed emotions strip him
of his veneer, Ed is betrayed for what and who he really is ... a
pathetically immature and insecure person whose inner-self is unworthy
of his towering arrogance. Understand that Ed Gin is fluent in
fractured English. To ensure that the remainder of my message is not
misconstrued or does not elude Ed's meager powers of perception, I will
compose the rest of this mini-diatribe so that English-challenged Ed
will not have to struggle to comprehend its meaning. Ed ... growing
old is mandatory ... growing up is optional. If you always do what
you've always done, you'll always be what you've always been. In your
case Ed, that entails all of the aforementioned follies and foibles.
Well Ed, it's time to get out your dictionary and decipher the message.
Jim McNamara
