Road Cycling · Public discussion

Traffic calming, etc.

Started by Matt O'Toole · · Last activity · 6 posts · 412 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
7 December 2004
Last activity
11 December 2004
Original author
Matt O'Toole
Posts
6
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
412
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–6 of 6
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. With traffic calming being the long OT drift of another thread -- I thought I'd
    suggest reading an article in the Dec. 2004 issue of Wired Magazine -- "Roads
    Gone Wild."

    Basically it's about traffic control solely by architecture of roads and
    intersections, eliminating all traditional control devices (lights, signs, etc.)

    I can't find it on the web, but it's a quick read at the
    newsstand/bookstore/library.

    Matt O.

  2. Matt O'Toole said:

    I can't find it on the web...

    news.google.com is your friend :-)
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/traffic.html

    RFM

  3. Fritz M said:
    Matt O'Toole said:

    I can't find it on the web...

    news.google.com is your friend :-)
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/traffic.html

    Yes, Google is everyone's friend -- in this case a better friend than Wired's
    own search engine!

    While we're at it, here's another:

    http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2004/05/20/traffic_design/

    You have to watch the ad to see the article, as usual with Salon. It only takes
    a second or two.

    Matt O.

  4. =v= That _Salon_ article was much-discussed online a few months
    ago, when it first appeared. The author's anecdote-based views
    about traffic in China do not accord with most observers', and
    she seems to have had some basic misunderstanding about traffic
    calming.

    =v= Basically, the meaning of "traffic calming" has eroded over
    the years, with municipalities implementing old-school traffic
    devices and *calling* it "traffic calming." Putting in speed
    bumps and calling them speed humps, for example.

    =v= So David Engwicht has (cleverly?) coined the phrase "second
    generation traffic calming" to mean, basically, a philosophy
    that was already part of traffic calming but has been getting
    overlooked. Plus a slight shift in emphasis. He describes it
    very well at his own website:

    http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/Traffic/SGTC.htm

    <_Jym_>

    --
    Boycott Compulsory Consumption:
    http://www.xmasresistance.org/

  5. test

  6. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Jym Dyer said:

    =v= So David Engwicht has (cleverly?) coined the phrase "second
    generation traffic calming" to mean, basically, a philosophy
    that was already part of traffic calming but has been getting
    overlooked. Plus a slight shift in emphasis. He describes it
    very well at his own website:

    http://www.lesstraffic.com/Articles/Traffic/SGTC.htm

    Thank you for that link; I found it a most intriguing read.
    I'd be tempted to call that approach "traffic rehumanizing".

    cheers,
    Tom

    --
    -- Nothing is safe from me.
    Above address is just a spam midden.
    I'm really at: tkeats [curlicue] vcn [point] bc [point] ca

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.