This is what causes folk to wonder when the "mr. hyde" shows up to attempt a save of the "dr. jeckle" side of the daring duo. It is lousy science. It would never be accepted for publication in any even simi peer reviewed science publication.
Quoted message said:
This is exactly what I am talking about when you deal with folks who do not have a research background yet want to argue about data. it's worthless and a waste of time.
Zoul wants "data". Roger, data is nothing more than information and it can, or cannot, be tied to research. If it is tied to research, you're out of your league trying to interpolate it. What Andrew has provided is data in the term of info. He, as I am, are well aware of whether it is research oriented or not. He, not I, *can* investigate research, research methodologies, citations and the like.
Top posting issues aside, you have no idea what it takes to make "good science" or "to be accepted for publication in any even simi peer reviewed science publication". Sentence structure alone pegs you as college challenged much less doctorate qualified. No doctorate? No qualifications.
===============================================
Quoted message said:
This is what causes folk to wonder when the "mr. hyde" shows up to attempt a save of the "dr. jeckle" side of the daring duo. It is lousy science. It would never be accepted for publication in any even simi peer reviewed science publication.
Quoted message said:
This is exactly what I am talking about when you deal with folks who do not have a research background yet want to argue about data. it's worthless and a waste of time.
Zoul wants "data". Roger, data is nothing more than information and it can, or cannot, be tied to research. If it is tied to research, you're out of your league trying to interpolate it. What Andrew has provided is data in the term of info. He, as I am, are well aware of whether it is research oriented or not. He, not I, *can* investigate research, research methodologies, citations and the like.
Ah, hit upon a nerve. You have no knowledge at all of my suite of letters to drape before and after my name. Most phd folk I have known show no indication of such, it is in fact a cause for some distain from them when seeing folk who have little but the alphebet to show for their efforts. This is an example of the most childish display of hissy fit to consider. Andrew does a bit of observation, thinks he sees a pattern, and calls it science. Mr. hyde to the battle changes that not a whit. Because the "pattern" is in it's weakist form by narrow definition of "data" serves only to reflect upon him very very badly in several aspects that leads one to pity after seeing that laughter is misplaced.
"Top posting issues aside, you have no idea what it takes to make "good science" or "to be accepted for publication in any even simi peer reviewed science publication". Sentence structure alone pegs you as college challenged much less doctorate qualified. No doctorate? No qualifications."
Your top posting issues aside, most phd folk I have known demonstrate much higher levels of conversational ability.
I am sorry if you feel my "distain" for your lies regarding your (lack of) educational qualifications fully demonstrated by the simple fact you can't spell. Maybe you use a different "alphebet" I bet. Maybe your nonsensical thought structure makes you the "weakist" link.
I'm alphebetting you are a moron.
Quoted message said:
You have no knowledge at all of my suite of letters to drape before and after my name. Most phd folk I have known show no indication of such, it is in fact a cause for some distain from them when seeing folk who have little but the alphebet to show for their efforts. This is an example of the most childish display of hissy fit to consider. Andrew does a bit of observation, thinks he sees a pattern, and calls it science. Mr. hyde to the battle changes that not a whit. Because the "pattern" is in it's weakist form by narrow definition of "data" serves only to reflect upon him very very badly in several aspects that leads one to pity after seeing that laughter is misplaced.
