"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not quite dumb. 🙂
There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Quoted message said:
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
You can't divide up the effect of an Olympics on the host city's local economy, which is another reason why a single site is not going to be welcomed with open arms.
(It reminds me of the idea to get all of the hotels in the area to agree not to raise their prices for the Olympics - I think somebody in Los Angeles seriously suggested this in 1983.)
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not
quite dumb. 🙂 ___
i'll even take it a few more degrees to be within reason & a legit idea. The UN has a permanent site in NYC, the world court has a permanent site in The Hague. It's not a totally foreign (pardon the pun) notion to have global forums w/fixed locations.
i think it might just make a lot of sense to have for example 20 year leases/sites (5 olympic games) at a fixed site. then rotate the games (winter or summer) to another hemisphere.
this would better justify the cost on the poor taxpayer who really pays for this [censored]. instead of a 3 week revenue generating stream and hope/pray you've made your mark and capture revenue going forward.....(tourism)....you could assert a 20 year revenue stream guaranteed....plus i could see lots of countries sending their athletes to that site to train annually.
And of course...there would be only one learning curve to ascend on the security side and then have it maintained/preserved. There are small regions w/locked down security...for example Singapore. Hong Kong is pretty tight too. I'm picturing a singular site to be like that...a city state...island....or village in the mountains..etc. A place managable geographically to "lock down"...
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not
quite dumb. 🙂 ___
i'll even take it a few more degrees to be within reason & a legit idea. The UN has a permanent site in NYC, the world court has a permanent site in The Hague. It's not a totally foreign (pardon the pun) notion to have global forums w/fixed locations.
i think it might just make a lot of sense to have for example 20 year leases/sites (5 olympic games) at a fixed site. then rotate the games (winter or summer) to another hemisphere.
this would better justify the cost on the poor taxpayer who really pays for this [censored]. instead of a 3 week revenue generating stream and hope/pray you've made your mark and capture revenue going forward.....(tourism)....you could assert a 20 year revenue stream guaranteed....plus i could see lots of countries sending their athletes to that site to train annually.
And of course...there would be only one learning curve to ascend on the security side and then have it maintained/preserved. There are small regions w/locked down security...for example Singapore. Hong Kong is pretty tight too. I'm picturing a singular site to be like that...a city state...island....or village in the mountains..etc. A place managable geographically to "lock down"...
It's not a crazy idea...
Not crazy at all. In fact, what if the Olympics had always been held in Greece, and then someone on the Internet came up with the idea to rotate the location, requiring billions of dollars of expenditures, untold headaches, and corruption in the bidding process to boot? Now that's crazy! Or so it would seem if the situation were reversed.
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not quite dumb. 🙂
-Doug
Aw c'mon guys. Can't you think farther outside the box than that?
Imagine if the permanent host wasn't a "host city" or some already-known place, but instead some special place created explicitly for the Olympics. Imagine an island somewhere over which no nation had sovereignty. Essentially an independent city-state named Olympia (similar to the Vatican city-state). This island is covered with well-designed, no compromise, permanent venues where the world's athletes gather every four years to compete (and probably gather in between Olympics to train).
A idealistic dream? Hell yes. But this is essentially the setup that brought us ancient Athens Greece in the first place.
(Of course, I'm dreaming, but I'm an architect - I get paid for this stuff - give me some slack)
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>,
Quoted message said:
There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not quite dumb. 🙂
But no worse an idea than the current system of bribery by host cities...
Imagine if the permanent host wasn't a "host city" or some already-known place, but instead some special place created explicitly for the Olympics. Imagine an island somewhere over which no nation had sovereignty. Essentially an independent city-state named Olympia (similar to the Vatican city-state). This island is covered with well-designed, no compromise, permanent venues where the world's athletes gather every four years to compete (and probably gather in between Olympics to train).
A idealistic dream?
No, a delusional episode, best treated with huge doses of lithium.
May not be a great idea, or be accepted by many but I agree wrt corruption, bribery etc and the travesty of letting the totalitiarian human rights abusers host the Games.
"Tom Phillips" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Doug Freese said:
"Harold Buck" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
In article <[email hidden]>, [email hidden] wrote:
> There have been some suggestions that, for economic and security > reasons, a permanent Olympics site be established.
One of the dumbest ideas of all time.
Well dumb is a little strong. 😉 The host site can make a bunch of money or at least build a site that will last forever. If it's a permanent site does all the money go to the host site? Now that's the way for a single place to make a boatload of money. If some could figure out the profit and divide it to everyones satisfaction then maybe.
Without a lot of questions answered I think it is a [censored] poor idea. Not quite dumb. 🙂
But no worse an idea than the current system of bribery by host cities...
Just don't let Doug get behind you during one of these threesomes, otherwise you may get a very rude surprise. Of course it's so tiny you probably won't notice it, but for his ego try to pretend it hurts.