On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 23:57:53 -0000, Fran <[email hidden]> wrote:
| [email hidden] said...
| > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 21:35:34 -0000, Fran wrote:
| >
| > >[email hidden] said...
| > >
| > >You'd probably be better off in Tesco if you don't have a
| > >Maplins, Comet, Dixons or similar. The postage on inexpensive
| > >things like batteries can be excessive because they're
| > >actually quite heavy and have to be carefully packed.
| >
| > Since when did rechargable batteries have to be carefully packed? They
| > are sold discharged, so no problems with accidental shorting, and have
| > you actually tried breaking one by dropping it? I doubt even one of my
| > colleages at Royal Mail could damage them by playing the "sort on the
| > other frame not this one" game. Most mailorder companies just bung em
| > in a jiffy bag.
| >
| So... that being the case, how on earth do some places - and
| no, I can't think of any examples offhand - justify charging
| so much for P&P?
So that they can give a low price where they are listed, but when you get
to "checkout" you find that what you pay is not low at all. Pure
marketing, nothing to do with Post and Packing.
Cynic Moi?
--
Dave F