UK and Europe · Public discussion

Proves it again...

Started by dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers · · Last activity · 10 posts · 392 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
20 November 2004
Last activity
22 November 2004
Original author
dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers
Posts
10
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
392
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–10 of 10
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. .... if you want to do away with someone and get off with a slapped wrist, once
    again it shows the car to be the weapon of choice :-(

    I am not ever surprised by these things any more, but I am *always* angered by
    the leniency shown to drivers who kill when clearly, it *wasn't* unavoidable. I
    am also continually appalled by the comment of the coroner, who seems to be an
    utter, well, the word rhymes with banker...

    See

    http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/News/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=Ne
    ws&tBrand=edponline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED19%20Nov%202004%2019%3A13%3A
    39%3A320

    or

    http://tinyurl.com/677hy

    "Driver didn't see cyclist, inquest hears

    MIKE SHERBURN

    20 November 2004 06:15

    A 17-year-old BMX enthusiast was killed after being hit by a car because the
    driver did not see him, an inquest heard yesterday.

    James Dean Halil had been on his way to meet friends on March 23 when the
    silver Peugeot 106 hit his bike. The trainee cabinet maker died in hospital
    from a fractured skull and brain injuries.

    Christopher Bulstrode, who was driving the car, told the hearing he had not
    seen any lights or reflective clothing before the crash, which happened at
    about 6.50pm as he was driving along the B1077 from Occold to Eye, near Diss.

    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see his
    girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But at 9pm he went
    to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a bang and
    something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit a
    cyclist."

    The inquest heard that Mr Halil's father had watched him leave the family home
    in Dublin Road, Rishangles, near Diss, and had seen that a red rear-facing
    light was tucked in his rucksack and visible.

    And police had spoken to two motorists who said they had seen him with his
    light visible shortly before the accident.

    Sgt Colin Teager said Mr Bulstrode told police he had been checking his rear
    mirror just before the crash, but could have just had a "momentary lapse of
    concentration".

    Recording a verdict of accidental death, Lowestoft coroner George Leguen de
    Lacroix said the crash had already had a "devastating effect" on Mr Bulstrode
    and the family of James Halil.

    He added it was "impossible to say why" Mr Bulstrode had not seen the cyclist.

    On July 21, Mr Bulstrode admitted careless driving, failing to stop after an
    accident and driving a vehicle which had sustained sufficient damage to cause
    potential injury. He was disqualified for a year and fined a total of £450."

    helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  2. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers said:

    The trainee cabinet maker died in hospital
    from a fractured skull and brain injuries.

    Christopher Bulstrode, who was driving the car, told the hearing he had not
    seen any lights or reflective clothing before the crash, which happened at
    about 6.50pm as he was driving along the B1077 from Occold to Eye, near Diss.

    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see his
    girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But at 9pm he went
    to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    One wonders how much he contributed further to the death by driving away
    "to see his girlfriend" and waiting over two hours before reporting the
    accident. In trauma medicine its well known that time to pre-hospital
    and hospital treatment is the biggest factor in survival which is why
    they have the Norfolk Accident Rescue Service to provide rapid medical
    support to accident victims. It doesn't say here how long it was after
    the accident before he was found and the emergency services activated.

    Tony

  3. in message <[email hidden]>,

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers (') said:

    ... if you want to do away with someone and get off with a slapped
    wrist, once again it shows the car to be the weapon of choice :-(

    I am not ever surprised by these things any more, but I am *always*
    angered by the leniency shown to drivers who kill when clearly, it
    *wasn't* unavoidable. I am also continually appalled by the comment of
    the coroner, who seems to be an utter, well, the word rhymes with
    banker...

    See

    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see
    his girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But
    at 9pm he went to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a
    bang and something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit
    a cyclist."

    So: he saw the cyclist come up on the bonnet of his car. He then looked
    behind to see the cyclist lying in the road, dying or dead. He then
    drove on, unconcerned. Hitting the cyclist may or may not be excusable,
    I'm not making any particular point about that. Failing to take the
    most urgent possible action to get medical attention to the victim is
    utterly inexcusable, and has to be manslaughter - no other charge can
    possibly be adequate.

    Quoted message said:

    And police had spoken to two motorists who said they had seen him with
    his light visible shortly before the accident.

    Sgt Colin Teager said Mr Bulstrode told police he had been checking
    his rear mirror just before the crash, but could have just had a
    "momentary lapse of concentration".

    And this man was not sent to prison? What on earth is the point of
    having a penal system?

    --
    [email hidden] (Simon Brooke) http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/

    ;; I'll have a proper rant later, when I get the time.

  4. Simon Brooke said:

    in message <[email hidden]>,

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers (') said:

    ... if you want to do away with someone and get off with a slapped
    wrist, once again it shows the car to be the weapon of choice :-(

    I am not ever surprised by these things any more, but I am *always*
    angered by the leniency shown to drivers who kill when clearly, it
    *wasn't* unavoidable. I am also continually appalled by the comment of
    the coroner, who seems to be an utter, well, the word rhymes with
    banker...

    See

    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see
    his girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But
    at 9pm he went to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a
    bang and something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit
    a cyclist."

    So: he saw the cyclist come up on the bonnet of his car. He then looked
    behind to see the cyclist lying in the road, dying or dead. He then
    drove on, unconcerned. Hitting the cyclist may or may not be excusable,
    I'm not making any particular point about that. Failing to take the
    most urgent possible action to get medical attention to the victim is
    utterly inexcusable, and has to be manslaughter - no other charge can
    possibly be adequate.

    Quoted message said:

    And police had spoken to two motorists who said they had seen him with
    his light visible shortly before the accident.

    Sgt Colin Teager said Mr Bulstrode told police he had been checking
    his rear mirror just before the crash, but could have just had a
    "momentary lapse of concentration".

    And this man was not sent to prison? What on earth is the point of
    having a penal system?

    Beggers belief doesn't it?

    I stuck a driver on last night for far, far less. The cyclist wasn't
    hurt but the driver had shown enough for a charge of careless driving
    and I had two witnesses.

    Sniper8052

  5. Simon Brooke vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    in message <[email hidden]>,

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers (') said:

    ... if you want to do away with someone and get off with a slapped
    wrist, once again it shows the car to be the weapon of choice :-(

    I am not ever surprised by these things any more, but I am *always*
    angered by the leniency shown to drivers who kill when clearly, it
    *wasn't* unavoidable. I am also continually appalled by the comment of
    the coroner, who seems to be an utter, well, the word rhymes with
    banker...

    See

    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see
    his girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But
    at 9pm he went to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a
    bang and something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit
    a cyclist."

    So: he saw the cyclist come up on the bonnet of his car. He then looked
    behind to see the cyclist lying in the road, dying or dead. He then
    drove on, unconcerned. Hitting the cyclist may or may not be excusable,
    I'm not making any particular point about that. Failing to take the
    most urgent possible action to get medical attention to the victim is
    utterly inexcusable, and has to be manslaughter - no other charge can
    possibly be adequate.

    Quoted message said:

    And police had spoken to two motorists who said they had seen him with
    his light visible shortly before the accident.

    Sgt Colin Teager said Mr Bulstrode told police he had been checking
    his rear mirror just before the crash, but could have just had a
    "momentary lapse of concentration".

    And this man was not sent to prison? What on earth is the point of
    having a penal system?

    Much as I hate to say it, it would seem that, in the eyes of 'the law',
    having a car is a licence to kill with relative impunity. Makes me ashamed
    to admit I love driving, cars, and fast cars to boot.

    --
    Paul ...
    (8(|) Homer Rules !!!
    "A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."

  6. Quoted message said:

    Much as I hate to say it, it would seem that, in the eyes of 'the law',
    having a car is a licence to kill with relative impunity. Makes me ashamed
    to admit I love driving, cars, and fast cars to boot.

    Well quite a few of us here are motorists as well as cyclists...and
    pedestrians. I like driving too. What I don't like is the way the law fails to
    deal with people who so *obviously* fail to take their responsibilities,
    legally & morally, towards other road users into account. It stinks.

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

  7. dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Much as I hate to say it, it would seem that, in the eyes of 'the law',
    having a car is a licence to kill with relative impunity. Makes me ashamed
    to admit I love driving, cars, and fast cars to boot.

    Well quite a few of us here are motorists as well as cyclists...and
    pedestrians. I like driving too. What I don't like is the way the law fails to
    deal with people who so *obviously* fail to take their responsibilities,
    legally & morally, towards other road users into account. It stinks.

    The problem is that for many, driving becomes fun when it becomes
    exciting. 250 miles by motorway is not fun. 50 miles on winding country
    roads is. The excitement comes from the element of danger and
    unpredictability.

    My recent observation (which had a marked effect on my driving style)
    was that if it's exciting, it's too fast for the circumstances.

    I can ride a bike at speeds and conditions that I find exciting, but
    which don't endanger others (much), the same is not true of driving off
    the race track.

    Jon

  8. Jon Senior vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers [email hidden] opined the
    following...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Much as I hate to say it, it would seem that, in the eyes of 'the law',
    having a car is a licence to kill with relative impunity. Makes me
    ashamed to admit I love driving, cars, and fast cars to boot.

    Well quite a few of us here are motorists as well as cyclists...and
    pedestrians. I like driving too. What I don't like is the way the law
    fails to deal with people who so *obviously* fail to take their
    responsibilities, legally & morally, towards other road users into
    account. It stinks.

    The problem is that for many, driving becomes fun when it becomes
    exciting. 250 miles by motorway is not fun. 50 miles on winding country
    roads is. The excitement comes from the element of danger and
    unpredictability.

    My recent observation (which had a marked effect on my driving style)
    was that if it's exciting, it's too fast for the circumstances.

    I can ride a bike at speeds and conditions that I find exciting, but
    which don't endanger others (much), the same is not true of driving off
    the race track.

    Whuilst I agree in general, personally I drive to 'wind down' on small
    country roads .. I now quite like bimbling along at 40 or 50 on an NSL road.
    😉

    Of course, however and probably unlike many other drivers, I still have the
    option of racing and my motorbike competition to take any aggression away.

    --
    Paul ...
    (8(|) Homer Rules !!!
    "A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."

  9. "dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    ... if you want to do away with someone and get off with a slapped wrist,


    once

    Quoted message said:

    again it shows the car to be the weapon of choice :-(

    I am not ever surprised by these things any more, but I am *always*


    angered by

    Quoted message said:

    the leniency shown to drivers who kill when clearly, it *wasn't*


    unavoidable. I

    Quoted message said:

    am also continually appalled by the comment of the coroner, who seems to


    be an

    Quoted message said:

    utter, well, the word rhymes with banker...

    See

    http://new.edp24.co.uk/content/News/story.aspx?brand=EDPOnline&category=Ne
    ws&tBrand=edponline&tCategory=news&itemid=NOED19%20Nov%202004%2019%3A13%3A
    39%3A320

    or

    http://tinyurl.com/677hy

    "Driver didn't see cyclist, inquest hears

    MIKE SHERBURN

    20 November 2004 06:15

    A 17-year-old BMX enthusiast was killed after being hit by a car because


    the

    Quoted message said:

    driver did not see him, an inquest heard yesterday.

    James Dean Halil had been on his way to meet friends on March 23 when the
    silver Peugeot 106 hit his bike. The trainee cabinet maker died in


    hospital

    Quoted message said:

    from a fractured skull and brain injuries.

    Christopher Bulstrode, who was driving the car, told the hearing he had


    not

    Quoted message said:

    seen any lights or reflective clothing before the crash, which happened at
    about 6.50pm as he was driving along the B1077 from Occold to Eye, near


    Diss.

    Quoted message said:


    Mr Bulstrode, of Mill Road, Occold, said he had been on his way to see his
    girlfriend at the time and did not stop after the collision. But at 9pm he


    went

    Quoted message said:

    to Eye police station and told them what had happened.

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a bang


    and

    Quoted message said:

    something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit a
    cyclist."

    The inquest heard that Mr Halil's father had watched him leave the family


    home

    Quoted message said:

    in Dublin Road, Rishangles, near Diss, and had seen that a red rear-facing
    light was tucked in his rucksack and visible.

    And police had spoken to two motorists who said they had seen him with his
    light visible shortly before the accident.

    Sgt Colin Teager said Mr Bulstrode told police he had been checking his


    rear

    Quoted message said:

    mirror just before the crash, but could have just had a "momentary lapse


    of

    Quoted message said:

    concentration".

    Recording a verdict of accidental death, Lowestoft coroner George Leguen


    de

    Quoted message said:

    Lacroix said the crash had already had a "devastating effect" on Mr


    Bulstrode

    Quoted message said:

    and the family of James Halil.

    He added it was "impossible to say why" Mr Bulstrode had not seen the


    cyclist.

    Quoted message said:


    On July 21, Mr Bulstrode admitted careless driving, failing to stop after


    an

    Quoted message said:

    accident and driving a vehicle which had sustained sufficient damage to


    cause

    Quoted message said:

    potential injury. He was disqualified for a year and fined a total of


    £450."

    Quoted message said:

    helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched


    off--

    Quoted message said:


    I have been knocked off twice by cars. The helmet debate aside, no serious
    or lasting injuries. The difference is that both drivers stopped, admitted
    their fault, were very remorseful and did what they could to help. Both
    also contacted me later to check my welfare. The first came into casualty
    to see me! This removed my impulse to get angry.

    We all make mistakes. What matters is how we deal with the consequences.

    Robin (shaken but not stirred) Long

  10. "dirtylitterboxofferingstospammers" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Reading his statement, the 20-year-old carpet fitter said: "I heard a bang


    and

    Quoted message said:

    something came up over the bonnet.

    "I was stunned by the sudden impact and looked behind to see I had hit a
    cyclist."

    Oh, only a cyclist, that's alright then, carry on.

    How could any normal person not stop?
    Words fail me.

    Pete

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.