Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Suspension frames?

Started by Mr. E. Mann · · Last activity · 14 posts · 1,595 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
31 May 2003
Last activity
5 June 2003
Original author
Mr. E. Mann
Posts
14
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,595
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–14 of 14
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I'm looking for some recomendations for suspension frames in the $1000 range. I've been looking at
    the Weyless 2003 SP on the low end and the Intense Tracer on the higher end (supergo is selling them
    for about $300 less than everywhere else). I also like the TOMAC REVOLVER PRO. This is going to be
    mainly for trail riding, so I wasnt to keep it pretty light. If I get into more agressive stuff,
    I'll just have to build another bike. Also, what about the AZONIC EXTENSION PROPULSION?

    If I can get by with the Weyless, that will save me about $600, but I really like the looks of the
    Tomac Revolver pro (black and yellow frame) and the Intense tracer (Red). Anyway, If anyone has
    any experience riding on these frames I would love to hear about it. Also, do these frames fit
    about the same as hard tail frames? IOW, would a 19 inch susp. frame be similar in size to a 19
    inch hard tail?

    Thanks for any help.

  2. "Mr. E. Mann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I'm looking for some recomendations for suspension frames in the $1000 range. I've been looking at
    the Weyless 2003 SP on the low end and the Intense Tracer on the higher end (supergo is selling
    them for about $300 less than everywhere else). I also like the TOMAC REVOLVER PRO. This is going
    to be mainly for trail riding, so I wasnt to keep it pretty light.


    If

    Quoted message said:

    I get into more agressive stuff, I'll just have to build another bike. Also, what about the AZONIC
    EXTENSION PROPULSION?

    Pssst - *cough*Blur!*cough*

    Also, check out the Titus Loco-moto. That was my second choice - very sweet frame. Also the
    Superlight. Tracers are damn nice, and you can find 'em for 1300ish now.

    Quoted message said:

    snip<

    Jon Bond

  3. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:XG9Ca.789504$OV.722251@rwcrnsc54:

    Quoted message said:

    "Mr. E. Mann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    <much>

    Quoted message said:

    Pssst - *cough*Blur!*cough*

    Also, check out the Titus Loco-moto. That was my second choice - very sweet frame. Also the
    Superlight. Tracers are damn nice, and you can find 'em for 1300ish now.

    Quoted message said:

    snip<

    Jon Bond

    Is there a web site for titus? I did a google search and couldn't find it. I did find a few pictures
    and it looks pretty nice, but I don't care for black that much (and I definitley didn't like the
    gold <barf!> one I saw).

  4. "Mr. E. Mann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:XG9Ca.789504$OV.722251@rwcrnsc54:

    Quoted message said:

    "Mr. E. Mann" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

    <much>

    Quoted message said:

    Pssst - *cough*Blur!*cough*

    Also, check out the Titus Loco-moto. That was my second choice - very sweet frame. Also the
    Superlight. Tracers are damn nice, and you can find 'em for 1300ish now.

    Quoted message said:

    snip<

    Jon Bond

    Is there a web site for titus? I did a google search and couldn't find it. I did find a few
    pictures and it looks pretty nice, but I don't care for black that much (and I definitley didn't
    like the gold <barf!> one I saw).

    titusti.commtn bikes frmset.html

    black, blue, grey, gold, red, pink. I know you want pink.

    Jon Bond

  5. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    news:XG9Ca.789504$OV.722251@rwcrnsc54...

    Quoted message said:


    Pssst - *cough*Blur!*cough*

    I would wait on a Blur. Aside from the fact that it is overhyped, it is a new model and has not yet
    proven itself. If everyone STILL thinks it is the greatest thing in the world in two years, then
    consider it.

    I was recently bike shopping and I very nearly ordered a Blur before I came to my senses.

    4 things:

    1- BOB is a rider problem, not a design failure. It is only a problem if you can't pedal in a
    circle. If you pedal sloppy enough, you can make even a URT bike bob. If you have a bob problem,
    practice pedaling your bike with one leg. Ride for a while, switch legs, repeat. It is a stupid
    boring drill, but it works.

    2- I got a little concerned watching SC's VPP marketing video. When the guy says something about
    chain tension keeping the back wheel in place, I started thinking: "Hmm my cranks are fixed to the
    chainring and my feet are fixed to the pedal. Can you say Kickback?"

    3- On a $1300 frame that is just going into production, let somebody else find the problems. Buy
    version 1.1.

    4- SC has a 1 year warranty. This is a $1300 frame with a one-year warranty! Specialized, Trek,
    Kestrel, etc, have lifetime warranty on the frames. Christ, even my old Haro has a lifetime warranty
    on the frame. SC is essentially saying, "We will sell you an expensive frame, but do not ask us to
    stand behind our work".

    -Dave

  6. "Dave Stocker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    news:XG9Ca.789504$OV.722251@rwcrnsc54...

    Quoted message said:


    Pssst - *cough*Blur!*cough*

    I would wait on a Blur. Aside from the fact that it is overhyped, it is a new model and has not
    yet proven itself. If everyone STILL thinks it is


    the

    Quoted message said:

    greatest thing in the world in two years, then consider it.

    Who gives a damn about hype? Ride the sucker, then decide. I can claim that full suspension is
    overhyped - and you know what, it is. Hell, so are suspension forks. And singlespeeds. Hype is part
    of the business, and smart marketing. There's a reason why you're still hearing the same thing about
    the blur over 6 months after its release. (They had working models in 2001 by the way, so there's
    your 2 years if you want to do it that way)

    If I waited two years every time a new technology came out, I'd still be shying away from 100mm
    forks, adjustable travel, fox forks (which I don't use, but if I wasn't sponsored by Marzocchi I'd
    seriously consider), any of the stable platform technologies (IE Epic, 5th element, manitou SPV)...
    why wait? BTW, VPP is not new technology - search for Outland bicycles. They supposedly rode really
    nice until they broke - fault of the engineering of the bike itself, not the suspension system.
    Santa Cruz actually wanted to release teh blur earlier, but decided to iron out as many bugs as they
    could find before they put it out to market - not many companies will do that.

    Quoted message said:

    I was recently bike shopping and I very nearly ordered a Blur before I


    came

    Quoted message said:

    to my senses.

    4 things:

    Quoted message said:

    1- BOB is a rider problem, not a design failure. It is only a problem if you can't pedal in a
    circle. If you pedal sloppy enough, you can make


    even

    Quoted message said:

    a URT bike bob. If you have a bob problem, practice pedaling your bike


    with

    Quoted message said:

    one leg. Ride for a while, switch legs, repeat. It is a stupid boring drill, but it works.

    There's a reason you don't see many URT bikes anymore - they actually bob quite a lot, besides being
    nasty. Also, don't try to say that bob is totally a rider problem. There's rotational acceleration,
    torque, and all sorts of factors that determine which way the rear wheel moves under power. Yes, if
    you've got a bad enough spin, any bike will bob, but there's a reason some bikes bob a hell of a lot
    more in some gears than others.

    Quoted message said:

    2- I got a little concerned watching SC's VPP marketing video. When the


    guy

    Quoted message said:

    says something about chain tension keeping the back wheel in place, I started thinking: "Hmm my
    cranks are fixed to the chainring and my feet


    are

    Quoted message said:

    fixed to the pedal. Can you say Kickback?"

    yes, I can - "kickback does not affect the blur". The suspension moves the rear wheel in a very
    slightly s-curved path. When there is tension on the chain in the sag position, it tends to move the
    rear wheel down the slope - in other words, into the middle of the small curve at the bottom. This
    keeps the bike from bobbing (much) from the sag position. The relatively slow speed compression will
    not push the bike far enough past this point to go into the main stroke of the shock. Higher speed
    compressions from terrain push the bike out of this range enough to get into the main part of the
    stroke, which is very similar in geometry to many four bar systems, and actually fairly conventional
    if taken alone. The difference between teh two types of compressions is also what allows shocks like
    the 5th element to work.

    Quoted message said:

    3- On a $1300 frame that is just going into production, let somebody else find the problems. Buy
    version 1.1.

    As a relatively small company, Santa Cruz constantly upgrades parts. There aren't specific model
    years, persay, unless they're planning a major redesign. Therefore, the current version is probably
    1.2, or 1.3. A bunch of other "boutique" brands do the same.

    Quoted message said:

    4- SC has a 1 year warranty. This is a $1300 frame with a one-year warranty! Specialized, Trek,
    Kestrel, etc, have lifetime warranty on the frames. Christ, even my old Haro has a lifetime
    warranty on the frame.


    SC

    Quoted message said:

    is essentially saying, "We will sell you an expensive frame, but do not


    ask

    Quoted message said:

    us to stand behind our work".

    Not all their bikes have it, for one thing. Second, SC provides pretty cheap replacement parts
    should you happen to get a non-warantee problem, such as a dent, from a crash, etc. Yes, its
    something to think about, and a good point.

    Quoted message said:

    -Dave

    And yes, I'm extremely biased, having one sitting in my room (but still not built up, argh!). I said
    consider it, and then gave examples of other bikes to try. The Blur is definitely not the
    be-all-end-all of mountain bikes - what fun would that be? However, its a new design, in his price
    range, that many many many people, including myself, find very attractive. Don't buy ANY bike
    without a test ride though - one man's heaven is another man's hell.

    Jon Bond

  7. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    If I waited two years every time a new technology came out, I'd still be


    shying away from 100mm forks, adjustable travel, fox forks (which I don't use, but if I wasn't
    sponsored by Marzocchi I'd seriously consider), any


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the stable platform technologies (IE Epic, 5th element, manitou SPV)...


    why

    Quoted message said:

    wait? BTW, VPP is not new technology - search for Outland bicycles. They supposedly rode
    really nice until they broke - fault of the engineering of the bike itself, not the suspension
    system. Santa Cruz actually wanted to release teh blur earlier, but decided to iron out as
    many bugs as they


    could

    Quoted message said:

    find before they put it out to market - not many companies will do that.

    The Epic is new and old. The LRS (Bergwerk) rear triangle is a modified four bar system and has
    been around for a couple of years. The brain shock on the Epic is new. It is not that smart and
    as a whole, the Epic is a lesser bike than the Bergwerk that it is based on. It is great for
    racers, but given that Specialized replaced the FSR with it, I do not think they had intended to
    have only a bike for racers. Progressive has been building motorcycle shocks for years. The 5th
    element is not really that new. My father rides a Honda Valkyre with something from progressive
    akin to a 5th element.

    I have a 100mm Fox on my current ride, so you got me there.

    What I am saying is that often (but not always) things come to market before they are mature. There
    is only so much testing that the engineers can do and a user will eventually do something that was
    not in the QA testlist. The Superlight has had many small improvements since it was introduced.

    Lastly, why did nobody pick up on VPP when Outland did it? It would not have been expensive to
    licence VPP from Outland. Or the parents could have been picked up for a song. Good suspension
    designs get copied. Four bar: Specialized, Kestrel, Intense, Steppenwolf, yada, yada. LRS: Bergwerk,
    Meridia (sp?), Specialized. Single pivot: yada, yada

    Quoted message said:

    There's a reason you don't see many URT bikes anymore - they actually bob quite a lot, besides
    being nasty. Also, don't try to say that bob is totally a rider problem. There's rotational
    acceleration, torque, and all sorts of factors that determine which way the rear wheel moves under


    power.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, if you've got a bad enough spin, any bike will bob, but there's a reason some bikes bob a
    hell of a lot more in some gears than others.

    I commute 20km a day on a URT (Katarga Proto Winner) bike and I used to ride trails with it. I have
    no problems with bob on that bike. I can even get out of the saddle and it is almost hardtail like.
    The pivot is just forward of the BB (Ala Maverick/Palomino). I never rode an extreme URT design such
    a Mantra, so I can't comment about them.

    The big downside of URT is that when you stand (say over rough ground), you are standing on the
    swingarm. They are not very active.

    Quoted message said:

    yes, I can - "kickback does not affect the blur". The suspension moves


    the

    Quoted message said:

    rear wheel in a very slightly s-curved path. When there is tension on the chain in the sag
    position, it tends to move the rear wheel down the


    slope -

    Quoted message said:

    in other words, into the middle of the small curve at the bottom. This keeps the bike from bobbing
    (much) from the sag position. The relatively slow speed compression will not push the bike far
    enough past this point


    to

    Quoted message said:

    go into the main stroke of the shock. Higher speed compressions from terrain push the bike out of
    this range enough to get into the main part


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the stroke, which is very similar in geometry to many four bar systems,


    and

    Quoted message said:

    actually fairly conventional if taken alone. The difference between teh


    two

    Quoted message said:

    types of compressions is also what allows shocks like the 5th element to work.

    How much of that is VPP and how much is shock. I would like to compare a Blur and a four bar bike
    side by side; both with 5E shocks.

    Quoted message said:

    As a relatively small company, Santa Cruz constantly upgrades parts.


    There

    Quoted message said:

    aren't specific model years, persay, unless they're planning a major redesign. Therefore, the
    current version is probably 1.2, or 1.3. A


    bunch

    Quoted message said:

    of other "boutique" brands do the same.

    Actually almost all manufacturers tweak the design. The Superlight is greatly improved. The last
    FSRs were a far cry from the first.

    Quoted message said:


    And yes, I'm extremely biased, having one sitting in my room (but still


    not

    Quoted message said:

    built up, argh!). I said consider it, and then gave examples of other


    bikes

    Quoted message said:

    to try. The Blur is definitely not the be-all-end-all of mountain bikes - what fun would that be?
    However, its a new design, in his price range,


    that

    Quoted message said:

    many many many people, including myself, find very attractive. Don't buy ANY bike without a test
    ride though - one man's heaven is another man's hell.

    For all of my [censored], I might very well have bought one if they had had test bikes available over
    here. I called SC Europe and they had two. One was with a bike magazine and the other was in Berlin.
    I was not going all the way to Berlin to test ride a bike. I was never able to test ride one and
    then I got to thinking about all of the ways it could be overhyped.

    So take me with a grain of salt.

    -Dave

  8. "Dave Stocker" <[email hidden]> wrote in message "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    snip<

    Lastly, why did nobody pick up on VPP when Outland did it? It would not have been expensive to
    licence VPP from Outland. Or the parents could


    have

    Quoted message said:

    been picked up for a song. Good suspension designs get copied. Four bar: Specialized, Kestrel,
    Intense, Steppenwolf, yada, yada. LRS: Bergwerk, Meridia (sp?), Specialized. Single pivot:
    yada, yada

    Technology was not up to optimizing that system yet. Besides, who wants to buy a suspension design
    that was known for breaking? Santa cruz took a chance, and so far it looks like it's paid off.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    There's a reason you don't see many URT bikes anymore - they actually


    bob

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    quite a lot, besides being nasty. Also, don't try to say that bob is totally a rider problem.
    There's rotational acceleration, torque, and


    all

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    sorts of factors that determine which way the rear wheel moves under


    power.

    Quoted message said:

    Yes, if you've got a bad enough spin, any bike will bob, but there's a reason some bikes bob a
    hell of a lot more in some gears than others.


    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    yes, I can - "kickback does not affect the blur". The suspension moves


    the

    Quoted message said:

    rear wheel in a very slightly s-curved path. When there is tension on


    the

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    chain in the sag position, it tends to move the rear wheel down the


    slope -

    Quoted message said:

    in other words, into the middle of the small curve at the bottom. This keeps the bike from
    bobbing (much) from the sag position. The


    relatively

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    slow speed compression will not push the bike far enough past this point


    to

    Quoted message said:

    go into the main stroke of the shock. Higher speed compressions from terrain push the bike out
    of this range enough to get into the main part


    of

    Quoted message said:

    the stroke, which is very similar in geometry to many four bar systems,


    and

    Quoted message said:

    actually fairly conventional if taken alone. The difference between teh


    two

    Quoted message said:

    types of compressions is also what allows shocks like the 5th element to work.

    How much of that is VPP and how much is shock. I would like to compare a Blur and a four bar bike
    side by side; both with 5E shocks.

    None of the blurs have 5E shocks yet, as they just came out. I think right about now they're
    planning on bringing some out with them as an option.

    I demoed two single pivot bikes, a four bar bike, and the blur one right after another. Blur was
    DEFINITELY more solid pedalling than any of the others. Yeah, it still bobbed a bit when you stand,
    but nowhere near as much.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    As a relatively small company, Santa Cruz constantly upgrades parts.


    There

    Quoted message said:

    aren't specific model years, persay, unless they're planning a major redesign. Therefore, the
    current version is probably 1.2, or 1.3. A


    bunch

    Quoted message said:

    of other "boutique" brands do the same.

    Actually almost all manufacturers tweak the design. The Superlight is greatly improved. The last
    FSRs were a far cry from the first.

    My bad, meant constant tweaking. Unless there's a major defect, most big manufacturers will just
    upgrade between model years. Smaller manufacturers can update mid production-run.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    And yes, I'm extremely biased, having one sitting in my room (but still


    not

    Quoted message said:

    built up, argh!). I said consider it, and then gave examples of other


    bikes

    Quoted message said:

    to try. The Blur is definitely not the be-all-end-all of mountain


    bikes -

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    what fun would that be? However, its a new design, in his price range,


    that

    Quoted message said:

    many many many people, including myself, find very attractive. Don't


    buy

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    ANY bike without a test ride though - one man's heaven is another man's hell.

    For all of my [censored], I might very well have bought one if they had had test bikes available
    over here. I called SC Europe and they had two. One was with a bike magazine and the other was in
    Berlin. I was not going all the way to Berlin to test ride a bike. I was never able to test ride
    one and then I got to thinking about all of the ways it could be overhyped.

    good call - I'd never buy a bike without test riding it. Just doesn't make sense.

    Quoted message said:

    So take me with a grain of salt.

    Add a lime and some hard liquor and you might have yourself a deal.

    Quoted message said:

    -Dave

    Jon Bond still in a bad mood from all this fscking rain, so sorry if I snap at anybody 😉

  9. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:


    If I waited two years every time a new technology came out, I'd still be shying away from
    100mm forks,

    I still prefer 80.

    Quoted message said:

    adjustable travel,

    A 100 mm fork that you spend twice as much on to run at 80 most of the time. Yawn.

    Quoted message said:

    fox forks

    I wouldn't have bought a 1.0 of Fox either, but after a couple of years, they sound pretty sweet.
    Not that I'm replacing my Bomber any time soon.

    Quoted message said:

    Epic,

    Hype.

    Quoted message said:

    5th element,

    What?

    Quoted message said:

    manitou SPV... why wait? BTW, VPP is not new technology -

    Acronym overload, Commander. That bike shop job is making your head soft.

    CC

  10. Dave Stocker said:

    For all of my [censored], I might very well have bought one if they had had test bikes available
    over here. I called SC Europe and they had two. One was with a bike magazine and the other was in
    Berlin. I was not going all the way to Berlin to test ride a bike. I was never able to test ride
    one and then I got to thinking about all of the ways it could be overhyped.

    JOOI, whereabouts in Germany are you?

  11. "Jon Bond" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    news:l6DCa.832200$Zo.172720@sccrnsc03...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    So take me with a grain of salt.

    Add a lime and some hard liquor and you might have yourself a deal.


    Deal!

    -Dave

  12. "bomba" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave Stocker said:

    For all of my [censored], I might very well have bought one if they had


    had

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    test bikes available over here. I called SC Europe and they had two.


    One

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    was with a bike magazine and the other was in Berlin. I was not going


    all

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the way to Berlin to test ride a bike. I was never able to test ride


    one

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and then I got to thinking about all of the ways it could be overhyped.

    JOOI, whereabouts in Germany are you?

    In the Kraichgau, about 15km south of Heidelberg.

    -Dave

  13. Dave Stocker said:
    Quoted message said:

    JOOI, whereabouts in Germany are you?

    In the Kraichgau, about 15km south of Heidelberg.

    What are the trails like down there? I was in Heidelberg last summer and it looked pretty good for
    riding. Wondering if it's worth taking a trip down there.

    bomba (Dusseldorf)

    --
    a.m-b FAQ: t-online.deambfaq.htm

    b.bmx FAQ: t-online.debmx faq.htm

  14. "bomba" <[email hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Dave Stocker said:
    Quoted message said:

    JOOI, whereabouts in Germany are you?

    In the Kraichgau, about 15km south of Heidelberg.

    What are the trails like down there? I was in Heidelberg last summer and it looked pretty good for
    riding. Wondering if it's worth taking a trip down there.

    bomba (Dusseldorf)

    HD does have some good riding. If you like tricky descents, there is a trail coming off of
    Konigstuhl and going down into the city that is a lot of fun. It passes through a place called
    Felsenmeer on the map and they were not kidding about the name. It is quite popular with the double
    crown crowd. There is also some singletrack over across the river on Heilegenstein. There is endless
    unpaved Waldweg of course.

    I ride mostly east of my house in a mix of farmland and forest. It is nothing spectacular, but
    nevertheless quite nice. Perhaps I will take pictures on a ride this weekend and post them.

    I am still searching for singletrack that lasts for more than a few hundred meters though. 🙁

    How is the riding up your way?

    -Dave (in Raunenberg-Rotenberg)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.