mikepenton said:*Unfortunately I'm thinking along exactly the same lines as the
seller. - lighter, smaller Uni with the speed advantage of a Coker.
the main disadvantages I see are the loss of rolling momentum, lower
sitting height. I don't understand why there would be less control
with a good hub. could you explain please? *
I have ridden Greg Harper's Blue Shift a couple of times. Not a lot,
but enough to learn what the thing is like. Blue Shift is a geared up
29er.
The forwards and backwards balance is more tricky than on a standard
unicycle. The balance envelope seems to shrink more than it ought to
given the virtual wheel size and the crank length. It required constant
focus and attention while riding. You have to pay attention to your
riding much more so than you do on a normal unicycle. It is much much
more difficult to recover from bumps and unexpected undulations in the
pavement than it is on a standard unicycle. Little bumps that would be
no problem on a standard unicycle can, and will, cause a UPD.
On a flat smooth bike trail the geared unicycle is a dream. Fun and
fast. A real thrill on what otherwise would be an uneventful ride on a
Coker. I rode the Blue Shift along a river bike trail and had a smile
on my face the whole time, (except for the times of sheer terror when I
thought I was going to loose it and crash).
On an urban hilly ride the Blue Shift is completely different. The Blue
Shift does not climb very well at all. Very difficult to maintain
momentum going up a hill. Very difficult to maintain balance while
going up a hill. These are hills that are trivial on a Coker, but I
found quite challenging on Blue Shift. This ride also included riding
on sidewalks with driveway cutout and curb cutouts. Those cutouts are
trivial on a Coker, but quite challenging on the Blue Shift. I had
several UPDs just trying to ride across driveway cutouts. There were
also intersections where the pavement was not even. The pavement gets
worn and wavy in old intersections. Trying to ride across those waves
was very difficult. I had a couple of UPDs because of that wavy
pavement.
On the flats the geared unicycle is fun fun fun. On hills the geared
unicycle sucks sucks sucks when in high gear. On uneven pavement the
geared unicycle is challenging to control. It's not unicycle nirvana.
It has faults.
I don't view the geared unicycle as a replacement for a Coker. There
are places where the Coker is much more forgiving and much more
appropriate. The geared unicycle is a supplemental unicycle for use in
addition to a Coker. I'd rather have a Coker first and a geared
unicycle second. The Coker is much more practical for cruising. For
example, the Coker is great for riding on dirt roads and smooth dirt
paths. The geared unicycle would be totally inappropriate in that
terrain.
All that said, I do want a geared 29er. It is fun and offerers a riding
experience that the Coker does not. But it will not be instead of my
Coker. My Coker will still get more riding time than the geared uni.
--
john_childs - Guinness Mojo
john_childs (at) hotmail (dot) com
Gallery: '' (http://www.unicyclist.com/gallery/john_childs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
john_childs's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/449
View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/36100