"Roger" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:The message <[email hidden]>
from "Mark South" <[email hidden]> contains these words:
Quoted message said:Quoted message said:> Step - stride - pace - which is which ?
I don't think there's a rigid definition. The trick is knowing what
works for you, and how long it is.
Quoted message said:As I already explained, the Romans were pretty clear on what a pace is.
Quoted message said:Unless you want to believe what the guy I once encountered in the pub
did, that a Roman mile was less than 1000 yards.
The Romans were pretty clear what they meant by decimation as well but
that hasn't stopped the normal usage turning the proportions pretty much
on their head.
The _enormity_ of the change is impressive ;-)
Yeah, I can think of a newsgroup or two that could do with a jolly good
decimation :-)
Even in the old sense it would still be kind of fun.
Quoted message said:I would go some way to support Mark.
Stepping or pacing? :-)
Quoted message said:One of my dictionaries defines pace
both ways ("1 a a single step in walking or running. b the distance
covered in this (about 75 cm or 30 in.). c the distance between two
successive stationary positions of the same foot in walking."
Dictionaries have difficulty with the idea of different words meaning different
things.
Quoted message said:Stride as
a single long step (or cross with one step) and step (confusingly) as "1
a the complete movement of one leg in walking or running (took a step
forward). b the distance covered by this."
The scientist in me is cringing at the way the definitions appear precise yet
merely defer the definition to other undefined terms.
Not that this is even important, but hey, .uk group.
--
Mark South, Super Genius: World Citizen, Net Denizen