Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Equal Access to Our Parks

Started by Mike Vandeman · · Last activity · 16 posts · 1,202 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
20 May 2003
Last activity
2 June 2003
Original author
Mike Vandeman
Posts
16
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,202
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–16 of 16
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. November 24, 1999 Tony Acosta Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs 1520
    Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612

    Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park

    Dear Sir:

    I am very concerned about the arbitrary and discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I
    like to practice bulldozer racing (also known as "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short).
    That is my way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why
    __________________________________________________
    is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?! ____ ____ You allow roller-bladers,
    equestrians, mountain bikers, and even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy
    ________
    the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better than me, or maybe you belong to one
    of those user groups, so you are biased towards them. In any case, you are discriminating against me
    and other bulldozer racers, and I demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth
    Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!

    I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's just because we are the new kid on
    the block. We are a tiny minority. I know that there have been some problems, such as some
    people riding recklessly, going off the designated trails, and even secretly constructing
    illegal trails. But those are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't allow a
    small minority to give the majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride responsibly, a bad
    name. Why should we be punished, just because of them, and be forced to walk, just ________
    ____ like everybody else?

    I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that it's a violation of CEQA (the
    California Environmental Quality Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the
    creation of new trails, without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you are
    right: mountain biking and bulldozer racing, when performed in an environmentally
    responsible
    ________________________________________________
    manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the environment.
    ______
    In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell
    __________
    that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
    mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them,
    they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing
    doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of
    ____
    wildlife where I ride.

    Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing small animals on the trail, such as
    snakes -- that we have to pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for
    wildlife. Are they that slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they are that slow,
    they aren't going to survive, anyway.

    Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers call them) claim that bulldozer
    racing does more harm to the environment than hiking. But a scientific study was done in
    ________________
    New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm
    _______
    than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion
    ________________
    is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused by bulldozer racing is not significant, by
    comparison. Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into another gated community for the
    rich? Without the support of strong environmentalists like us, that's what will inevitably happen!
    We are your strongest defense against development. If a park doesn't have a strong constituency of
    recreational users, no
    ____________
    one will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost.
    ____
    (That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying it, in order to save it". But what do
    they know?) The HOHAs
    ____
    claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring people to get into wildlife habitat. But if
    nobody goes there, who will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the
    _________________________________
    better it is for the wildlife!
    ______________________________

    Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, killing them! Can you believe
    that?! In Muir Woods National Monument, they don't even let people walk next to them, making
    ____
    them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must be run by an environmental extremist
    tree-hugger!

    I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is annoying, and destroys their
    experience of nature. I guess they're superior to everybody else. They are just being
    selfish. They just don't want to share "their" trails with anybody else! That's obvious. The
    older ones claim that they have given up going there, because they are afraid of being hit,
    or are tired of constantly having to get off the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that
    just evolution -- survival of the fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole
    park to themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have just as much right to be there as they do. We
    are just as much environmentalists as they are. We love nature! That's why we
    ____
    want to ride there!

    When you have spent as much on your equipment as we have, believe me, it is very
    frustrating, not to have any place to use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail
    building. However, we can understand the frustration of people whose only sin is
    preferring a different way of enjoying nature. They think that, because they are able to
    purchase a piece of equipment that lets them go off-road, the public is obligated to give
    them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't that the American way? Aren't they
    just like the pioneers?

    We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong in the parks just as much as everybody else. If the
    HOHAs don't want us on their trails, because we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them
    difficult to walk on, then we deserve to have our own trails,
    ___
    which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space for everyone. If the wildlife don't
    like it, they can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I said, that's
    ____
    what evolution is all about.

    We will even police our own riders, so that you won't have any additional expenses. After
    all, how would you catch a renegade
    _____
    bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive bulldozers, increasing the wear and tear
    on the trails. We can do that for you. How about it? There are more and more of us every day.
    And we vote.
    ____

    Sincerely,

    Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  2. Quoted message said:

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

    I just saw that you didnt update your page since last time i looked so i was wondering if you could
    put a picture of my bike up on your page?

    sitecenter.dkbilleder

    pick one yourself.

    Kisses Peet

  3. Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more valuable land that is REALLY being
    ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED with smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America.
    Seems to me they are burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable environmentally,
    and the fact that the air is saturated with smoke for a thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like
    mountain bikes are pretty small potatoes compared to this!

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    November 24, 1999 Tony Acosta Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs 1520
    Lakeside Drive Oakland, CA 94612

    Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park

    Dear Sir:

    I am very concerned about the arbitrary and discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I like
    to practice bulldozer racing (also known as "bulldozer scrambling", or BS, for short). That is my
    way of enjoying nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why
    __________________________________________________
    is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?! ____ ____ You allow roller-bladers,
    equestrians, mountain bikers, and even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy
    ________
    the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better than me, or maybe you belong to one
    of those user groups, so you are biased towards them. In any case, you are discriminating against
    me and other bulldozer racers, and I demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth
    Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately!

    I know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's just because we are the new kid on the
    block. We are a tiny minority. I know that there have been some problems, such as some people
    riding recklessly, going off the designated trails, and even secretly constructing illegal trails.
    But those are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't allow a small minority to give
    the majority of us bulldozer racers, who ride responsibly, a bad name. Why should we be punished,
    just because of them, and be forced to walk, just ________ ____ like everybody else?

    I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that it's a violation of CEQA (the California
    Environmental Quality Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the creation of new trails,
    without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact Report). But you are right: mountain biking and
    bulldozer racing, when performed in an environmentally responsible
    ________________________________________________
    manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the environment.
    ______
    In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell
    __________
    that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the
    mountain biking trails. If the trails didn't benefit them,
    they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing
    doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of
    ____
    wildlife where I ride.

    Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing small animals on the trail, such as snakes
    -- that we have to pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for wildlife. Are they
    that slow? What about "survival of the fittest"? If they are that slow, they aren't going to
    survive, anyway.

    Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers call them) claim that bulldozer racing
    does more harm to the environment than hiking. But a scientific study was done in
    ________________
    New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm
    _______
    than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion
    ________________
    is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused by bulldozer racing is not significant,
    by comparison. Would you rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into another gated community
    for the rich? Without the support of strong environmentalists like us, that's what will inevitably
    happen! We are your strongest defense against development. If a park doesn't have a strong
    constituency of recreational users, no
    ____________
    one will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost.
    ____
    (That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying it, in order to save it". But what do
    they know?) The HOHAs
    ____
    claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring people to get into wildlife habitat. But
    if nobody goes there, who will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the
    _________________________________
    better it is for the wildlife!
    ______________________________

    Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, killing them! Can you believe that?! In
    Muir Woods National Monument, they don't even let people walk next to them, making
    ____
    them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must be run by an environmental extremist
    tree-hugger!

    I know that some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is annoying, and destroys their experience of
    nature. I guess they're superior to everybody else. They are just being selfish. They just don't
    want to share "their" trails with anybody else! That's obvious. The older ones claim that they
    have given up going there, because they are afraid of being hit, or are tired of constantly having
    to get off the trail to let bulldozers go by. Isn't that just evolution -- survival of the
    fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole park to themselves? We pay taxes, too.
    We have just as much right to be there as they do. We are just as much environmentalists as they
    are. We love nature! That's why we
    ____
    want to ride there!

    When you have spent as much on your equipment as we have, believe me, it is very frustrating, not
    to have any place to use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail building. However, we can
    understand the frustration of people whose only sin is preferring a different way of enjoying
    nature. They think that, because they are able to purchase a piece of equipment that lets them go
    off-road, the public is obligated to give them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't
    that the American way? Aren't they just like the pioneers?

    We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong in the parks just as much as everybody else. If the HOHAs
    don't want us on their trails, because we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them difficult to
    walk on, then we deserve to have our own trails,
    ___
    which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space for everyone. If the wildlife don't
    like it, they can always move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I said, that's
    ____
    what evolution is all about.

    We will even police our own riders, so that you won't have any additional expenses. After all, how
    would you catch a renegade
    _____
    bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive bulldozers, increasing the wear and tear
    on the trails. We can do that for you. How about it? There are more and more of us every day. And
    we vote.
    ____

    Sincerely,

    Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  4. Quoted message said:

    Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more valuable land that is REALLY
    being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED with smoke coming from South Mexico and Central
    America. Seems to me they are burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable
    environmentally, and the fact that the air is saturated with smoke for a thousand miles doesnt
    help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty small potatoes compared to this!

    It is very sad. I was just in Belize and there are what seems to be hundreds of fires going all over
    the place. The whole country stinks of burning forest. I never realized how good the air smells in
    Virginia until I got back.

  5. "John Harlow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more


    valuable

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    land that is REALLY being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America. Seems to me they


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable environmentally, and the fact
    that the air is saturated with smoke for a thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like mountain bikes
    are pretty small potatoes compared to this!

    It is very sad. I was just in Belize and there are what seems to be hundreds of fires going all
    over the place. The whole country stinks of burning forest. I never realized how good the air
    smells in Virginia


    until

    Quoted message said:

    I got back.

    Its crazy that we are feeling the effects here in AUSTIN TX!! Its really hot because of the
    greenhouse effects.. we have had a week of record breaking/tieing heat, elderly and sick have a
    rough time of breathing (not to mention those riders who breath hard like myself). It won't rain
    because the smog prevents it. It looks like a thick brownish fog, that lasts ALL day and wont burn
    off... its disgusting. I'd hate to see whats happening down there!!

  6. Jesus, Mike! Can't you come up with fresh arguments?

  7. I have been a pilot for almost 18 years. You should see what Mexico City looks like from the front
    seat in the air. Sort of what LAX used to look like in the eighties before some clean up efforts
    were made....

    "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "John Harlow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more


    valuable

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    land that is REALLY being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED


    with

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America. Seems to me they


    are

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable environmentally, and the fact
    that the air is saturated with smoke for


    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty


    small

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    potatoes compared to this!

    It is very sad. I was just in Belize and there are what seems to be hundreds of fires going all
    over the place. The whole country stinks of burning forest. I never realized how good the air
    smells in Virginia


    until

    Quoted message said:

    I got back.

    Its crazy that we are feeling the effects here in AUSTIN TX!! Its really


    hot

    Quoted message said:

    because of the greenhouse effects.. we have had a week of record breaking/tieing heat, elderly and
    sick have a rough time of breathing (not to mention those riders who breath hard like myself). It
    won't rain


    because

    Quoted message said:

    the smog prevents it. It looks like a thick brownish fog, that lasts ALL day and wont burn off...
    its disgusting. I'd hate to see whats happening down there!!

  8. One thing I left out-

    It seems to get worse though...... (MEX)

    "The Airman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have been a pilot for almost 18 years. You should see what Mexico City looks like from the front
    seat in the air. Sort of what LAX used to look like in the eighties before some clean up efforts
    were made....

    "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "John Harlow" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    > Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more


    valuable

    Quoted message said:

    > land that is REALLY being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are


    CHOKED

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    with

    Quoted message said:

    > smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America. Seems to me


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    are

    Quoted message said:

    > burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable environmentally, and the fact
    > that the air is saturated with smoke


    for

    Quoted message said:

    a

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty


    small

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > potatoes compared to this!

    It is very sad. I was just in Belize and there are what seems to be hundreds of fires going
    all over the place. The whole country stinks


    of

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    burning forest. I never realized how good the air smells in Virginia


    until

    Quoted message said:

    I got back.

    Its crazy that we are feeling the effects here in AUSTIN TX!! Its really


    hot

    Quoted message said:

    because of the greenhouse effects.. we have had a week of record breaking/tieing heat, elderly
    and sick have a rough time of breathing


    (not

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    to mention those riders who breath hard like myself). It won't rain


    because

    Quoted message said:

    the smog prevents it. It looks like a thick brownish fog, that lasts


    ALL

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    day and wont burn off... its disgusting. I'd hate to see whats


    happening

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    down there!!


  9. Mike Vandeman said:

    Michael J. Vandeman, Ph.D.

    As in piled higher and deeper, right?

    Guy
    ===
    ** WARNING ** This posting may contain traces of irony. chapmancentral.comchapmancentral.com (BT ADSL and
    dynamic DNS permitting)
    NOTE: BT Openworld have now blocked port 25 (without notice), so old mail addresses may no longer
    work. Apologies.

  10. On Tue, 20 May 2003 13:32:46 +0200, "Peter Tønnesen" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .sitecenter.dkbilleder

    Too booooring.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  11. On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:34:38 -0500, "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more valuable .land that is REALLY
    being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED with .smoke coming from South Mexico and Central
    America. Seems to me they are .burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable
    .environmentally, and the fact that the air is saturated with smoke for a .thousand miles doesnt
    help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty small .potatoes compared to this!

    By your logic, you shouldn't complain about your wife being raped, if she wasn't killed. Are you
    guys really THAT stupid?

    ."Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    ."]news:[email hidden]... .> November 24, 1999 .> Tony Acosta .> Director,
    Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs .> 1520 Lakeside Drive .> Oakland, CA 94612 .> .>
    Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park .> .> Dear Sir: .> .> I am very concerned about the arbitrary and
    .> discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I like to .> practice bulldozer racing (also known
    as "bulldozer .> scrambling", or BS, for short). That is my way of enjoying .> nature. Who are you
    to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why .> __________________________________________________ .>
    is your way of enjoying the outdoors any better than mine?! .> ____ ____ .> You allow
    roller-bladers, equestrians, mountain bikers, and .> even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded,
    and can't enjoy .> ________ .> the parks that I pay taxes for. You obviously like them better .>
    than me, or maybe you belong to one of those user groups, so .> you are biased towards them. In any
    case, you are .> discriminating against me and other bulldozer racers, and I .> demand that this
    discrimination, which violates the Fifth .> Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately! .> .> I
    know that bulldozer racers have a bad name, but that's .> just because we are the new kid on the
    block. We are a tiny .> minority. I know that there have been some problems, such as .> some people
    riding recklessly, going off the designated .> trails, and even secretly constructing illegal
    trails. But .> those are a small minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't .> allow a small
    minority to give the majority of us bulldozer .> racers, who ride responsibly, a bad name. Why
    should we be .> punished, just because of them, and be forced to walk, just .> ________ ____ .> like
    everybody else? .> .> I also know that some extremist tree-huggers claim that .> it's a violation of
    CEQA (the California Environmental Quality .> Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the
    creation .> of new trails, without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact .> Report). But you are right:
    mountain biking and bulldozer .> racing, when performed in an environmentally responsible .>
    ________________________________________________ .> manner, doesn't have a significant impact on the
    environment. .> ______ .> In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell .> __________
    .> that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the .> mountain biking trails. If the trails
    didn't benefit them, .> they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing .> doesn't drive
    out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of .> ____ .> wildlife where I ride. .> .> Some people say
    that we ride too fast to avoid killing .> small animals on the trail, such as snakes -- that we have
    to .> pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for .> wildlife. Are they that slow?
    What about "survival of the .> fittest"? If they are that slow, they aren't going to survive, .>
    anyway. .> .> Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers .> call them) claim that
    bulldozer racing does more harm to the .> environment than hiking. But a scientific study was done
    in .> ________________ .> New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing does no more harm .> _______ .>
    than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion .> ________________ .> is caused by
    nature, and so any additional erosion caused by .> bulldozer racing is not significant, by
    comparison. Would you .> rather have the park clear-cut, or turned into another gated .> community
    for the rich? Without the support of strong .> environmentalists like us, that's what will
    inevitably happen! .> We are your strongest defense against development. If a park .> doesn't have a
    strong constituency of recreational users, no .> ____________ .> one will care about it, and it will
    inevitably be lost. .> ____ .> (That's what those environmental extremists call "destroying .> it,
    in order to save it". But what do they know?) The HOHAs .> ____ .> claim that vehicles make it too
    easy for lazy, uncaring people .> to get into wildlife habitat. But if nobody goes there, who .>
    will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the .> _________________________________ .>
    better it is for the wildlife! .> ______________________________ .> .> Another claim is that we
    compact the soil around redwoods, .> killing them! Can you believe that?! In Muir Woods National .>
    Monument, they don't even let people walk next to them, making .> ____ .> them stick to pavement or
    raised walkways. They must be run by .> an environmental extremist tree-hugger! .> .> I know that
    some HOHAs claim that bulldozer racing is .> annoying, and destroys their experience of nature. I
    guess .> they're superior to everybody else. They are just being .> selfish. They just don't want to
    share "their" trails with .> anybody else! That's obvious. The older ones claim that they .> have
    given up going there, because they are afraid of being .> hit, or are tired of constantly having to
    get off the trail to .> let bulldozers go by. Isn't that just evolution -- survival of .> the
    fittest? Why should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole .> park to themselves? We pay taxes, too.
    We have just as much .> right to be there as they do. We are just as much .> environmentalists as
    they are. We love nature! That's why we .> ____ .> want to ride there! .> .> When you have spent as
    much on your equipment as we have, .> believe me, it is very frustrating, not to have any place to
    .> use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail building. .> However, we can understand the
    frustration of people whose .> only sin is preferring a different way of enjoying nature. .> They
    think that, because they are able to purchase a piece of .> equipment that lets them go off-road,
    the public is obligated .> to give them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't .> that
    the American way? Aren't they just like the pioneers? .> .> We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong in
    the parks just as .> much as everybody else. If the HOHAs don't want us on their .> trails, because
    we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them .> difficult to walk on, then we deserve to have our
    own trails, .> ___ .> which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space .> for everyone.
    If the wildlife don't like it, they can always .> move! It's just survival of the fittest. As I
    said, that's .> ____ .> what evolution is all about. .> .> We will even police our own riders, so
    that you won't have any .> additional expenses. After all, how would you catch a renegade .> _____
    .> bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive .> bulldozers, increasing the wear and
    tear on the trails. We can .> do that for you. How about it? There are more and more of us .> every
    day. And we vote. .> ____ .> .> Sincerely, .> .> Michael J. Vandeman, .> Ph.D. .> .> === .> I am
    working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to .> humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help?
    (I spent the previous 8 .> years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) .> .>
    home.pacbell.netmjvande .

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  12. On Tue, 20 May 2003 12:30:02 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .Jesus, Mike! Can't you come up with fresh arguments?

    Why? the old ones are still valid, and you guys haven't been able to refute even ONE of them.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  13. By your logic, you'd rather have her killed then looked at funny! Doesn't seem to bother you if shes
    dead, so long as your happy little tiny world is preserved. Whats the point of worrying about a
    little thing if theres a MUCH bigger problem elsewhere. Spend your efforts where they can really
    make a difference.

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:34:38 -0500, "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more


    valuable

    Quoted message said:

    .land that is REALLY being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED


    with

    Quoted message said:

    .smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America. Seems to me they are .burning their country
    to ashes. That land is far more valuable .environmentally, and the fact that the air is saturated
    with smoke for a .thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty small .potatoes
    compared to this!

    By your logic, you shouldn't complain about your wife being raped, if she


    wasn't

    Quoted message said:

    killed. Are you guys really THAT stupid?

    ."Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    ."]news:[email hidden]... .> November 24, 1999 .> Tony Acosta .>
    Director, Office of Parks, Recreation, and Cultural Affairs .> 1520 Lakeside Drive .> Oakland, CA
    94612 .> .> Re: Access to Joaquin Miller Park .> .> Dear Sir: .> .> I am very concerned about the
    arbitrary and .> discriminatory management of Oakland's parks. I like to .> practice bulldozer
    racing (also known as "bulldozer .> scrambling", or BS, for short). That is my way of enjoying .>
    nature. Who are you to tell me how I should enjoy nature?! Why .>
    __________________________________________________ .> is your way of enjoying the outdoors any
    better than mine?! .> ____ ____ .> You allow roller-bladers, equestrians, mountain bikers, and .>
    even hikers in your parks. But I am excluded, and can't enjoy .> ________ .> the parks that I pay
    taxes for. You obviously like them better .> than me, or maybe you belong to one of those user
    groups, so .> you are biased towards them. In any case, you are .> discriminating against me and
    other bulldozer racers, and I .> demand that this discrimination, which violates the Fifth .>
    Amendment to the Constitution, stop immediately! .> .> I know that bulldozer racers have a bad
    name, but that's .> just because we are the new kid on the block. We are a tiny .> minority. I
    know that there have been some problems, such as .> some people riding recklessly, going off the
    designated .> trails, and even secretly constructing illegal trails. But .> those are a small
    minority of bulldozer riders. You shouldn't .> allow a small minority to give the majority of us
    bulldozer .> racers, who ride responsibly, a bad name. Why should we be .> punished, just because
    of them, and be forced to walk, just .> ________ ____ .> like everybody else? .> .> I also know
    that some extremist tree-huggers claim that .> it's a violation of CEQA (the California
    Environmental Quality .> Act) to allow a new use of the park trails, and the creation .> of new
    trails, without doing an EIR (Environmental Impact .> Report). But you are right: mountain biking
    and bulldozer .> racing, when performed in an environmentally responsible .>
    ________________________________________________ .> manner, doesn't have a significant impact on
    the environment. .> ______ .> In fact, it's actually beneficial to wildlife. You can tell .>
    __________ .> that, by the fact that you often see deer tracks on the .> mountain biking trails.
    If the trails didn't benefit them, .> they wouldn't use them, now would they? Bulldozer racing .>
    doesn't drive out wildlife. That is a myth. I see lots of .> ____ .> wildlife where I ride. .> .>
    Some people say that we ride too fast to avoid killing .> small animals on the trail, such as
    snakes -- that we have to .> pay attention to avoid crashing, and can't also look out for .>
    wildlife. Are they that slow? What about "survival of the .> fittest"? If they are that slow, they
    aren't going to survive, .> anyway. .> .> Some HOHAs ("Hateful Old Hikers", as the mountain bikers
    .> call them) claim that bulldozer racing does more harm to the .> environment than hiking. But a
    scientific study was done in .> ________________ .> New Zealand, proving that bulldozer racing
    does no more harm .> _______ .> than hiking. Another scientific study showed that most erosion .>
    ________________ .> is caused by nature, and so any additional erosion caused by .> bulldozer
    racing is not significant, by comparison. Would you .> rather have the park clear-cut, or turned
    into another gated .> community for the rich? Without the support of strong .> environmentalists
    like us, that's what will inevitably happen! .> We are your strongest defense against development.
    If a park .> doesn't have a strong constituency of recreational users, no .> ____________ .> one
    will care about it, and it will inevitably be lost. .> ____ .> (That's what those environmental
    extremists call "destroying .> it, in order to save it". But what do they know?) The HOHAs .> ____
    .> claim that vehicles make it too easy for lazy, uncaring people .> to get into wildlife habitat.
    But if nobody goes there, who .> will protect the park? The more people go to a park, the .>
    _________________________________ .> better it is for the wildlife! .>
    ______________________________ .> .> Another claim is that we compact the soil around redwoods, .>
    killing them! Can you believe that?! In Muir Woods National .> Monument, they don't even let
    people walk next to them, making .> ____ .> them stick to pavement or raised walkways. They must
    be run by .> an environmental extremist tree-hugger! .> .> I know that some HOHAs claim that
    bulldozer racing is .> annoying, and destroys their experience of nature. I guess .> they're
    superior to everybody else. They are just being .> selfish. They just don't want to share "their"
    trails with .> anybody else! That's obvious. The older ones claim that they .> have given up going
    there, because they are afraid of being .> hit, or are tired of constantly having to get off the
    trail to .> let bulldozers go by. Isn't that just evolution -- survival of .> the fittest? Why
    should hikers, or anyone else, have the whole .> park to themselves? We pay taxes, too. We have
    just as much .> right to be there as they do. We are just as much .> environmentalists as they
    are. We love nature! That's why we .> ____ .> want to ride there! .> .> When you have spent as
    much on your equipment as we have, .> believe me, it is very frustrating, not to have any place to
    .> use it! We don't, of course, condone illegal trail building. .> However, we can understand the
    frustration of people whose .> only sin is preferring a different way of enjoying nature. .> They
    think that, because they are able to purchase a piece of .> equipment that lets them go off-road,
    the public is obligated .> to give them a place to use it. That's understandable -- isn't .> that
    the American way? Aren't they just like the pioneers? .> .> We bulldozer racers ("BS-ers"😉 belong
    in the parks just as .> much as everybody else. If the HOHAs don't want us on their .> trails,
    because we allegedly create narrow ruts, and make them .> difficult to walk on, then we deserve to
    have our own trails, .> ___ .> which we will gladly build for free. There is plenty of space .>
    for everyone. If the wildlife don't like it, they can always .> move! It's just survival of the
    fittest. As I said, that's .> ____ .> what evolution is all about. .> .> We will even police our
    own riders, so that you won't have any .> additional expenses. After all, how would you catch a
    renegade .> _____ .> bulldozer racer? Your rangers would also need to drive .> bulldozers,
    increasing the wear and tear on the trails. We can .> do that for you. How about it? There are
    more and more of us .> every day. And we vote. .> ____ .> .> Sincerely, .> .> Michael J. Vandeman,
    .> Ph.D. .> .> === .> I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to .> humans
    ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 .> years fighting auto dependence and road
    construction.) .> .> home.pacbell.netmjvande .

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  14. No, the old arguments are as full of [censored] today as they were when they were still fresh. You are
    pathetic ...

    "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 May 2003 12:30:02 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <[email hidden]>


    Quoted message said:


    .Jesus, Mike! Can't you come up with fresh arguments?

    Why? the old ones are still valid, and you guys haven't been able to


    refute even

    Quoted message said:

    ONE of them.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to
    help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    home.pacbell.netmjvande

  15. "Mike Vandeman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:34:38 -0500, "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more


    valuable

    Quoted message said:

    .land that is REALLY being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED


    with

    Quoted message said:

    .smoke coming from South Mexico and Central America. Seems to me they are .burning their country
    to ashes. That land is far more valuable .environmentally, and the fact that the air is saturated
    with smoke for a .thousand miles doesnt help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty small .potatoes
    compared to this!

    By your logic, you shouldn't complain about your wife being raped, if she


    wasn't

    Quoted message said:

    killed. Are you guys really THAT stupid?

    Wow, what logic!

    Look up stupid in the dictionary and you will find Mike's picture.

    Hawke

  16. Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]> wrote in :"]news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    On Tue, 20 May 2003 08:34:38 -0500, "TacomaBoy" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .Hey Mike, wouldnt it be more prudent to try and conserve the more valuable .land that is REALLY
    being ravaged? Right now in Austin we are CHOKED with .smoke coming from South Mexico and Central
    America. Seems to me they are .burning their country to ashes. That land is far more valuable
    .environmentally, and the fact that the air is saturated with smoke for a .thousand miles doesnt
    help. Seems like mountain bikes are pretty small .potatoes compared to this!

    By your logic, you shouldn't complain about your wife being raped, if she wasn't killed. Are you
    guys really THAT stupid?

    By my logic I'd rather see you raped than my moutain bike trails closed down.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.