When training is based on your maximum heart rate would it best to test for
maximum HR for each different sport. My max for running is 183 and my max
for cycling is 172 this makes my training on the bike at 70-80% of MHR at
only 120-137. When i was training with Mark Allen online all the training
was based my Max HR, that being pretty much 220-age. So what is best, to
train using zones based on the 220-age or by using my max hr for each
individual sports.
thanks
Triathlon · Public discussion
maximum heart rates
This thread is locked and is currently read-only.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Triathlon
- Published
- 4 October 2004
- Last activity
- 4 October 2004
- Original author
- Jason/Tina
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 394
- Views / 30 days
- 0
- Topics
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
I think the best methodology would be using not the MHR but your anaerobic
threhold (AT). You can find methods to improve your AT easily enough.Both AT and MHR values change for each different sport. So you should test
for the values for each sport, and you should do the test regularly to keep
track of the changes and change your training accordingly. You can use the
Conconi method to calculate your AT.HTH,
--
Remove the obvious part to reply
Burak-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
http://www.usenet.com
Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -
Concur with Burak, AT (aka LT) is the best measure. Running LT is normally
5-10 bpm above cycling LT. Although it sounds like you are on the right
track if you have identified a different max for each sport. Give the LT
test a try.AJ
"Burak Ilter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
**** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
I think the best methodology would be using not the MHR but your anaerobic
threhold (AT). You can find methods to improve your AT easily enough.Both AT and MHR values change for each different sport. So you should test
for the values for each sport, and you should do the test regularly to
keepQuoted message said:
track of the changes and change your training accordingly. You can use the
Conconi method to calculate your AT.HTH,
--
Remove the obvious part to reply
Burak-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*** Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! ***
http://www.usenet.com
Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -
"Jason/Tina" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
When training is based on your maximum heart rate would it best to test for
maximum HR for each different sport. My max for running is 183 and my max
for cycling is 172 this makes my training on the bike at 70-80% of MHR at
only 120-137. When i was training with Mark Allen online all the training
was based my Max HR, that being pretty much 220-age. So what is best, to
train using zones based on the 220-age or by using my max hr for each
individual sports.
thanksHow did you calculate different MHR's for the different sports? I
would like to know how to do this. Thanks,j
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.