Recumbent bicycles · Public discussion

Longbike Weights?

Started by Joshua Goldberg · · Last activity · 8 posts · 1,684 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Recumbent bicycles
Published
22 January 2003
Last activity
22 January 2003
Original author
Joshua Goldberg
Posts
8
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,684
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–8 of 8
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Nice (new) site, but none of the bents listed have their weight displayed...a wee oversight I'm
    sure. It just seems like the 1st thing people would look for when comparing various SWB models. Well
    maybe not the 1st thing, but it would be in the top 5 considerations IMO.

  2. If you'll read BJB's reviews I think you'll see a comment about heavy weights and prices....

    and this, "Our test bike weighed in at a hair over 40 pounds with its fenders, rack, kickstand and
    empty seat bag." at

    tandembike.comReviews.html

    "Joshua Goldberg" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...
    [q1]> Nice (new) site, but none of the bents listed have their weight displayed...a wee oversight I'm[/q1]
    [q1]> sure. It just seems like the 1st thing people would look for when comparing various SWB models.[/q1]
    [q1]> Well maybe not[/q1]
    the
    [q1]> 1st thing, but it would be in the top 5 considerations IMO.[/q1]

  3. The original Avatar was 29 lbs. the Vanguard was 31 lbs. The weight of recumbents has always been an
    issue with the critics. I've been involved in a number of on-line arguments about the importance of
    weight with the DF purists. Of course the people on this NG are aware that it is pretty much a
    non-issue, but as the recumbent market has slowly grown, a performance oriented customer group has
    started to emerge, equivalent to the classic drop bar roadie type that has so long dominated the DF
    bike business. Hopefully these people wont evolve into the weight weenies who agonize over every
    gram of extra weight and who talk endlessly about things like how to save weight by drilling out
    your brake levers. I'd say that the average weight of a Vanguard usually ended up at about 40 lbs.
    The majority of our customers used the bikes for touring as I'm sure will most likely be the case
    for Longbikes customers. Over the years we had some customers who did some pretty impressive
    mileage. The first Avatar customer (who was 60 when he bought the bike) did a club century ride a
    couple of days after he bought it. His next ride was from Ohio to British Columbia, by the age of 80
    he had put something like 80,000 miles on the bike. The longest mileage in a single day that I know
    of was 312 miles by a 51 year old rider. Another customer did 40 consecutive centuries on a trip
    from Bend Oregon to Anaheim Ca. to Jacksonville Fl. This was done on a Vanguard that had every
    accessory known to man including a single wheel trailer designed by the owner, total bike weight of
    about 100 lbs. The same guy did STP on a Duplex tandem alone with the trailer. So, for those who
    might be concerned about weight, don't worry, a couple of extra pounds isn't going to hurt.

    [censored] Ryan

    Quoted message said:

    Nice (new) site, but none of the bents listed have their weight displayed...a wee oversight I'm
    sure. It just seems like the 1st thing people would look for when comparing various SWB models.
    Well maybe not


    the

    Quoted message said:

    1st thing, but it would be in the top 5 considerations IMO.

  4. The original Avatar was 29 lbs. the Vanguard was 31 lbs. The weight of recumbents has always been an
    issue with the critics. I've been involved in a number of on-line arguments about the importance of
    weight with the DF purists. Of course the people on this NG are aware that it is pretty much a
    non-issue, but as the recumbent market has slowly grown, a performance oriented customer group has
    started to emerge, equivalent to the classic drop bar roadie type that has so long dominated the DF
    bike business. Hopefully these people wont evolve into the weight weenies who agonize over every
    gram of extra weight and who talk endlessly about things like how to save weight by drilling out
    your brake levers. I'd say that the average weight of a Vanguard usually ended up at about 40 lbs.
    The majority of our customers used the bikes for touring as I'm sure will most likely be the case
    for Longbikes customers. Over the years we had some customers who did some pretty impressive
    mileage. The first Avatar customer (who was 60 when he bought the bike) did a club century ride a
    couple of days after he bought it. His next ride was from Ohio to British Columbia, by the age of 80
    he had put something like 80,000 miles on the bike. The longest mileage in a single day that I know
    of was 312 miles by a 51 year old rider. Another customer did 40 consecutive centuries on a trip
    from Bend Oregon to Anaheim Ca. to Jacksonville Fl. This was done on a Vanguard that had every
    accessory known to man including a single wheel trailer designed by the owner, total bike weight of
    about 100 lbs. The same guy did STP on a Duplex tandem alone with the trailer. So, for those who
    might be concerned about weight, don't worry, a couple of extra pounds isn't going to hurt.

    [censored] Ryan

    Quoted message said:

    Nice (new) site, but none of the bents listed have their weight displayed...a wee oversight I'm
    sure. It just seems like the 1st thing people would look for when comparing various SWB models.
    Well maybe not


    the

    Quoted message said:

    1st thing, but it would be in the top 5 considerations IMO.

  5. Quoth "Doug Huffman" <[email hidden]>:
    | If you'll read BJB's reviews I think you'll see a comment about heavy weights and prices....
    |
    | and this, "Our test bike weighed in at a hair over 40 pounds with its fenders, rack, kickstand and
    | empty seat bag." at
    |
    | tandembike.comReviews.html

    Though of course that wouldn't precisely apply when ``comparing various SWB models'', because it
    refers to the LWB Slipstream for one thing.

    But of course it's a vague figure anyway. For another example, BROL says his test Streetmachine
    weighed 42 lbs, and the HP web site says a basic Streetmachine weighs 36. Of course if Greg cited a
    weight for the Eliminator, it would be a factory weight like the one HP gives, and you could assume
    that the complete outfit would be a few pounds heavier, but it just seems so ambiguous that you
    still might be looking at numbers that aren't valid for comparison.

    Donn

  6. Quoth "Doug Huffman" <[email hidden]>:
    | If you'll read BJB's reviews I think you'll see a comment about heavy weights and prices....
    |
    | and this, "Our test bike weighed in at a hair over 40 pounds with its fenders, rack, kickstand and
    | empty seat bag." at
    |
    | tandembike.comReviews.html

    Though of course that wouldn't precisely apply when ``comparing various SWB models'', because it
    refers to the LWB Slipstream for one thing.

    But of course it's a vague figure anyway. For another example, BROL says his test Streetmachine
    weighed 42 lbs, and the HP web site says a basic Streetmachine weighs 36. Of course if Greg cited a
    weight for the Eliminator, it would be a factory weight like the one HP gives, and you could assume
    that the complete outfit would be a few pounds heavier, but it just seems so ambiguous that you
    still might be looking at numbers that aren't valid for comparison.

    Donn

  7. I thought about that before. Greg would be stuck with giving the weights with the various parts
    added, long inseam, short inseam, OSS/USS etc. But there is usually one stated weight for the bent
    as described...then you add the bells and whistles you want from there and you can guesstimate what
    each addition weighs added to the base weight. No base weight and you can end up adding fenders to
    something that weighs more than a ReBike. I assume the weight omission was an oversight and not
    intentional....but it may end up being the (most) frequently asked question and then Longbikes will
    be spending all their time Emailing the weight. I will not lose any sleep over this...cause I'm not
    even mildly interested in SWBs, just thought it was curious and I am not trying to read anything
    into this very minor omission....yawn (slow day).
    ----------------------------------------------------
    "Donn Cave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1042395461.653295@yasure...

    Quoted message said:

    Quoth "Doug Huffman" <[email hidden]>:
    | If you'll read BJB's reviews I think you'll see a comment about heavy weights and prices....
    |
    | and this, "Our test bike weighed in at a hair over 40 pounds with its fenders, rack, kickstand
    | and empty seat bag." at
    |
    | tandembike.comReviews.html

    Though of course that wouldn't precisely apply when ``comparing various SWB models'', because it
    refers to the LWB Slipstream for one thing.

    But of course it's a vague figure anyway. For another example, BROL says his test Streetmachine
    weighed 42 lbs, and the HP web site says a basic Streetmachine weighs 36. Of course if Greg cited
    a weight for the Eliminator, it would be a factory weight like the one HP gives, and you could
    assume that the complete outfit would be a few pounds heavier, but it just seems so ambiguous that
    you still might be looking at numbers that aren't valid for comparison.

    Donn

  8. I thought about that before. Greg would be stuck with giving the weights with the various parts
    added, long inseam, short inseam, OSS/USS etc. But there is usually one stated weight for the bent
    as described...then you add the bells and whistles you want from there and you can guesstimate what
    each addition weighs added to the base weight. No base weight and you can end up adding fenders to
    something that weighs more than a ReBike. I assume the weight omission was an oversight and not
    intentional....but it may end up being the (most) frequently asked question and then Longbikes will
    be spending all their time Emailing the weight. I will not lose any sleep over this...cause I'm not
    even mildly interested in SWBs, just thought it was curious and I am not trying to read anything
    into this very minor omission....yawn (slow day).
    ----------------------------------------------------
    "Donn Cave" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:1042395461.653295@yasure...

    Quoted message said:

    Quoth "Doug Huffman" <[email hidden]>:
    | If you'll read BJB's reviews I think you'll see a comment about heavy weights and prices....
    |
    | and this, "Our test bike weighed in at a hair over 40 pounds with its fenders, rack, kickstand
    | and empty seat bag." at
    |
    | tandembike.comReviews.html

    Though of course that wouldn't precisely apply when ``comparing various SWB models'', because it
    refers to the LWB Slipstream for one thing.

    But of course it's a vague figure anyway. For another example, BROL says his test Streetmachine
    weighed 42 lbs, and the HP web site says a basic Streetmachine weighs 36. Of course if Greg cited
    a weight for the Eliminator, it would be a factory weight like the one HP gives, and you could
    assume that the complete outfit would be a few pounds heavier, but it just seems so ambiguous that
    you still might be looking at numbers that aren't valid for comparison.

    Donn

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.