Road Cycling · Public discussion

got yellow?

Started by sven tvuttenvutter · · Last activity · 9 posts · 383 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
13 October 2004
Last activity
15 October 2004
Original author
sven tvuttenvutter
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
383
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    -------------

    High School Runners Win Battle Over Cancer Wristbands
    Updated: Wednesday, Oct. 13, 2004 - 6:24 AM

    VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP) - Stung by criticism of its action, a high
    school district has reversed a decision to disqualify cross country
    runners for wearing Lance Armstrong LiveStrong wristbands.

    The decision was reversed because "adequate prior notice had not been
    given to the participants," Bruce Biehl, Kellam High School's
    principal and chairman of Beach District cross country, said in a
    statement released Tuesday.

    More than 20 runners were declared ineligible in a meet last Wednesday
    for wearing the popular LiveStrong bands, sold for $1 apiece. Proceeds
    go to the Lance Armstrong Foundation, which provides practical
    information to cancer survivors.

    Biehl said the meet results are being retallied and will be announced
    Wednesday.

    Runners will be allowed to continue wearing the wristbands for the
    rest of the district cross country season, he said. Biehl added that
    clarification will be sought on wearing the bands during regional and
    state competitions.

    A flood of e-mails protesting the decision followed a story Saturday
    in The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk detailing the Beach District's
    action.

    The decision to disqualify the runners, Biehl said, was in keeping
    with a recently drafted National Federation of State High School
    Associations ruling classifying the band as jewelry. But Biehl
    acknowledged that runners and coaches weren't given much notice.

    The Virginia High School League circulated the new policy to schools
    on Oct. 4, two days before the meet.

    Many of the runners in last Wednesday's meet said they were unaware
    that the bands were classified as jewelry and would have taken them
    off had they known they risked disqualification.

    "Our kids certainly weren't wearing them to be defiant," said Mike
    Nestor, coach at Ocean Lakes High. "We're kind of in awe of everything
    that's happened."

    But Nestor said the controversy has served as a learning tool for his
    athletes.

    "Sometimes you wear that band but forget what it's really for," Nestor
    said. "I've received e-mails from all over the country from cancer
    survivors voicing their support. Through their stories, we've learned
    what an inspiration that band really is."

    (Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


  2. Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    Which means what precisely? I am guessing you have never used Oakleys. Aside
    from the fact that Oakley makes a lot of high fashion over-prices [censored], they
    also make some of the best eyewear available at any price. Your comparison
    to a cheap trinket intended to show solidarity with cancer patients is a bit
    confusing,

  3. Sounds like some of Chung's Liberal teacher friends. Cocaine would be OK but
    none of that clean living [censored] around a member of the NEA.

    "sven tvuttenvutter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    -------------

    High School Runners Win Battle Over Cancer Wristbands
    Updated: Wednesday, Oct. 13, 2004 - 6:24 AM

    VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP) - Stung by criticism of its action, a high
    school district has reversed a decision to disqualify cross country
    runners for wearing Lance Armstrong LiveStrong wristbands.

    The decision was reversed because "adequate prior notice had not been
    given to the participants," Bruce Biehl, Kellam High School's
    principal and chairman of Beach District cross country, said in a
    statement released Tuesday.

    More than 20 runners were declared ineligible in a meet last Wednesday
    for wearing the popular LiveStrong bands, sold for $1 apiece. Proceeds
    go to the Lance Armstrong Foundation, which provides practical
    information to cancer survivors.

    Biehl said the meet results are being retallied and will be announced
    Wednesday.

    Runners will be allowed to continue wearing the wristbands for the
    rest of the district cross country season, he said. Biehl added that
    clarification will be sought on wearing the bands during regional and
    state competitions.

    A flood of e-mails protesting the decision followed a story Saturday
    in The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk detailing the Beach District's
    action.

    The decision to disqualify the runners, Biehl said, was in keeping
    with a recently drafted National Federation of State High School
    Associations ruling classifying the band as jewelry. But Biehl
    acknowledged that runners and coaches weren't given much notice.

    The Virginia High School League circulated the new policy to schools
    on Oct. 4, two days before the meet.

    Many of the runners in last Wednesday's meet said they were unaware
    that the bands were classified as jewelry and would have taken them
    off had they known they risked disqualification.

    "Our kids certainly weren't wearing them to be defiant," said Mike
    Nestor, coach at Ocean Lakes High. "We're kind of in awe of everything
    that's happened."

    But Nestor said the controversy has served as a learning tool for his
    athletes.

    "Sometimes you wear that band but forget what it's really for," Nestor
    said. "I've received e-mails from all over the country from cancer
    survivors voicing their support. Through their stories, we've learned
    what an inspiration that band really is."

    (Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

  4. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    Which means what precisely? I am guessing you have never used Oakleys.

    Wrong. Have had two pair -- and each time I lost one or broke one
    (them being mega bucks), I felt like a chump. Now I wear $29
    performance throwaways.

    Quoted message said:

    Aside
    from the fact that Oakley makes a lot of high fashion over-prices [censored], they
    also make some of the best eyewear available at any price.

    Bet you ride a $5000 ti/campy record bike too, in your cat 5 crits and
    high intensity training rides. No, waitaminute ... "best eyewear
    available at any price"? Oakley employee?

    Quoted message said:

    Your comparison to a cheap trinket intended to show solidarity
    with cancer patients is a bit confusing,

    If you say so.

  5. sven tvuttenvutter said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wrong. Have had two pair -- and each time I lost one or broke one
    (them being mega bucks), I felt like a chump. Now I wear $29
    performance throwaways.

    my sunglasses cost over a hundred bucks. never regretted buying them
    because they're comfortable, even if they do make me look like a dork.
    (for comparison, my entire bike cost $250.) i've had them at least 3
    years now, but i only wear them when i'm exercising. maybe that helps
    keep them from breaking or getting lost?

    heather

  6. sven tvuttenvutter said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    You have the coolest name in the universe.

    --

    --------------------

    Remove CLOTHES to reply

  7. Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    You're not supposed to wear them on your head, they're wrist straps.

    "sven tvuttenvutter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    -------------

    High School Runners Win Battle Over Cancer Wristbands
    Updated: Wednesday, Oct. 13, 2004 - 6:24 AM

    VIRGINIA BEACH, Va. (AP) - Stung by criticism of its action, a high
    school district has reversed a decision to disqualify cross country
    runners for wearing Lance Armstrong LiveStrong wristbands.

    The decision was reversed because "adequate prior notice had not been
    given to the participants," Bruce Biehl, Kellam High School's
    principal and chairman of Beach District cross country, said in a
    statement released Tuesday.

    More than 20 runners were declared ineligible in a meet last Wednesday
    for wearing the popular LiveStrong bands, sold for $1 apiece. Proceeds
    go to the Lance Armstrong Foundation, which provides practical
    information to cancer survivors.

    Biehl said the meet results are being retallied and will be announced
    Wednesday.

    Runners will be allowed to continue wearing the wristbands for the
    rest of the district cross country season, he said. Biehl added that
    clarification will be sought on wearing the bands during regional and
    state competitions.

    A flood of e-mails protesting the decision followed a story Saturday
    in The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk detailing the Beach District's
    action.

    The decision to disqualify the runners, Biehl said, was in keeping
    with a recently drafted National Federation of State High School
    Associations ruling classifying the band as jewelry. But Biehl
    acknowledged that runners and coaches weren't given much notice.

    The Virginia High School League circulated the new policy to schools
    on Oct. 4, two days before the meet.

    Many of the runners in last Wednesday's meet said they were unaware
    that the bands were classified as jewelry and would have taken them
    off had they known they risked disqualification.

    "Our kids certainly weren't wearing them to be defiant," said Mike
    Nestor, coach at Ocean Lakes High. "We're kind of in awe of everything
    that's happened."

    But Nestor said the controversy has served as a learning tool for his
    athletes.

    "Sometimes you wear that band but forget what it's really for," Nestor
    said. "I've received e-mails from all over the country from cancer
    survivors voicing their support. Through their stories, we've learned
    what an inspiration that band really is."

    (Copyright 2004 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

  8. "sven tvuttenvutter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    Which means what precisely? I am guessing you have never used Oakleys.

    Wrong. Have had two pair -- and each time I lost one or broke one
    (them being mega bucks), I felt like a chump. Now I wear $29
    performance throwaways.

    There must be a good reason that you feel like a chump. That seems
    consistent with what we already know.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Aside
    from the fact that Oakley makes a lot of high fashion over-prices [censored],


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    also make some of the best eyewear available at any price.

    Bet you ride a $5000 ti/campy record bike too, in your cat 5 crits and
    high intensity training rides. No, waitaminute ... "best eyewear
    available at any price"? Oakley employee?

    No dipshit. Simply because you can't tell the difference doesn't mean others
    can't.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Your comparison to a cheap trinket intended to show solidarity
    with cancer patients is a bit confusing,

    If you say so.

    I did say so and you have done nothing to clarify your position even when
    asked to. I guess "Oakley" has some special meaning *to you* that you
    mistakenly assumed others would agree with.

  9. "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    "sven tvuttenvutter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "Chris" <[email hidden]> wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > livestrong bands are today's oakleys ...

    Which means what precisely? I am guessing you have never used Oakleys.

    Wrong. Have had two pair -- and each time I lost one or broke one
    (them being mega bucks), I felt like a chump. Now I wear $29
    performance throwaways.

    There must be a good reason that you feel like a chump. That seems
    consistent with what we already know.

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZ. That the best you got fat boy?

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Aside
    from the fact that Oakley makes a lot of high fashion over-prices [censored],


    they

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    also make some of the best eyewear available at any price.

    Bet you ride a $5000 ti/campy record bike too, in your cat 5 crits and
    high intensity training rides. No, waitaminute ... "best eyewear
    available at any price"? Oakley employee?

    No dipshit. Simply because you can't tell the difference doesn't mean others
    can't.

    You spend your time *telling the difference* if you want; I'll be out
    riding.

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:

    Your comparison to a cheap trinket intended to show solidarity
    with cancer patients is a bit confusing,

    If you say so.

    I did say so and you have done nothing to clarify your position even when
    asked to. I guess "Oakley" has some special meaning *to you* that you
    mistakenly assumed others would agree with.

    Nope. Just thought it was funny. And I really just wanted to say
    "got yellow?" Now shut up and go lick your lance poster.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.