Scott Ehardt said:More at: http://www.wd40.com/AboutUs/our_history.html
As such, I do not think it is a very good chain lube, but it would probably
help Dan with his water problem.
It will help at the time of application, but be pretty worthless as a
long term solution. It also isn't much help to the lubricants that may
already be in place. So you do a surface job which does not much more
than remove irrelevant surface rust on links or you do a better job
that compromises the lubricants in place in the pivots and to what
end? The bike is then worse off the next time it goes out the door
without a thorough lubrication. Which would do the job fine on its
own.
Unless all the trips are 360 and he repeats the performance every time
or carries the WD-40 with him, it is a waste of time as he described
his problem (repeated and regular occasions).
If you're talking about a singular (more or less) occasion where you
are trying to use WD-40 as a flush, I can buy that, maybe. I had bikes
on the roof in a thunderstorm in Ohio that had the semis pulling off
to the side of the road for the best part of two hours. It might make
sense then (well, later, when you are cleaning out the water).
Otherwise, WD-40 IMO has very little purpose on a bike that hasn't any
seized parts. And there are cheap, better solutions for that.
I don't have the answer to his (Dan's) question, but would guess that
a commuter or other regular cyclist in a rainer area than DC-Maryland
would be able to give feedback on the best lubricants for rainy areas.
Once it is in place, it shouldn't be compromised by a regular rain
fall. In this area the various versions of Tri-flow or whatever seem
to work well enough, but it isn't that wet here and I park the bikes
in a garage.
Curtis L. Russell
Odenton, MD (USA)
Just someone on two wheels...