In message <[email hidden]>, Alan Braggins <[email hidden]> writes
Quoted message said:
In article said:
I despair sometimes. How can he not have seen and felt this happen?
If he thought he hit a stone, presumably he did feel (or at least hear) it. Muntjac are pretty small.
Obviusly, to fit in that hole :-)
Quoted message said:
I could imagine that the driver felt/heard the bump, looked behind in the mirror to see what it might have been, saw nothing dead lying in the road and then assumed it must have been a stone or some such -- Chris French, Leeds
A deer survived a 25-mile ride in the bumper of a car after it was hit by a motorist travelling to work.
The muntjac deer remained unnoticed by the driver who thought he had hit a stone and continued on his way.
I'd have guessed, as he was driving a Rover, that he just thought another bit had fallen off the car ... 😉
Sis-in-law had a Rover 400. Within a year of having it a front bumper dropped off, nearside front door mirror fell off, interior mirror fell off ... amongst other bits going wrong .. 😉
-- Paul ...
(8(|) Homer Rules !!!
"A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."
If he thought he hit a stone, presumably he did feel (or at least hear) it. Muntjac are pretty small.
Yes they are small but not mouse small or so small that they aren't obvious unless you have your eyes closed. And not so small and lightweight that you could mistake hitting one for a stone bouncing up.
Muntjacs really are vermin, although they haven't officially been classed as such yet. I have little sympathy for them.
Well, even if they are vermin I think we could probably find a more humane way of trying to kill them than crashing into them with a Rover!
What did they do wrong? I realise it must have been descended from immigrant deer, as Muntjac are not a native British species, so I guess it was sponging off the state, planning too large a family and was a possibly a factor in deciduous woodland crime statistics but where do you stop?
Is that nice Mr Michael Howard next for the chop? What would be a suitable car? Answers on a postcard....
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:40:28 +0100, Tony Raven <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I despair sometimes. How can he not have seen and felt this happen?
Well, a bus driver hit a pensioner in Durham last year and failed to notice. He dragged her body over a mile before stopping to check. Muntjac are smaller than pensioners.
"Paul - [censored]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
I'd have guessed, as he was driving a Rover, that he just thought another bit had fallen off the car ... 😉
When visiting Romania there were two distinct classes of car: Modern western European ones usually tailgating <1> Dacias trundling along at very sedate speeds. The Dacias are basically Romanian built Renault 12s and although production only ceased this past summer they are typically rust boxes held together with string and look unroadworthy to say the least. Imagine how I laughed when I saw one of these wrecks towing a Rover 45. Imagine how quickly I stopped laughing when relating this story to my sister who quipped "I've got a Rover 45" :-(
<1> The worst offenders for tailgating with lights on full beam were, yes you guessed, Kensington Tractors. To watch these looneys overtaking on the hairpins of the Carpathians was interesting, unless they were approaching head-on of course.
"Colin Blackburn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:40:28 +0100, Tony Raven <[email hidden]>
Quoted message said:
I despair sometimes. How can he not have seen and felt this happen?
Well, a bus driver hit a pensioner in Durham last year and failed to notice. He dragged her body over a mile before stopping to check. Muntjac are smaller than pensioners.
<1> The worst offenders for tailgating with lights on full beam were, yes you guessed, Kensington Tractors. To watch these looneys overtaking on the hairpins of the Carpathians was interesting, unless they were approaching head-on of course.
Heheheh .. my 'Kensington tractor' is a little different to those, I guess .... It does actually get used, and abused, off-road a _lot_ ... 😉
What did they do wrong? I realise it must have been descended from immigrant deer, as Muntjac are not a native British species, so I guess it was sponging off the state, planning too large a family and was a possibly a factor in deciduous woodland crime statistics but where do you stop?
They escaped from Woburn Abbey. They're crowding out native deer and they eat everything the rabbits can't reach. Send 'em all home.
Imagine how I laughed when I saw one of these wrecks towing a Rover 45. Imagine how quickly I stopped laughing when relating this story to my sister who quipped "I've got a Rover 45" :-(
I was in the Isle of Man Hilton waiting for a taxi a couple of years ago. "Look, there's an MG ZS in the car park", I said to my colleague, "they're just pimped-up Rover 45s!".
The guy who had been sitting next to us in reception stood up, went out and drove it away.
Zog The Undeniable <[email hidden]> wrote in news:4166c646.0@entanet:
Quoted message said:
Julesh said:
What did they do wrong? I realise it must have been descended from immigrant deer, as Muntjac are not a native British species, so I guess it was sponging off the state, planning too large a family and was a possibly a factor in deciduous woodland crime statistics but where do you stop?
They escaped from Woburn Abbey. They're crowding out native deer and they eat everything the rabbits can't reach. Send 'em all home.
"Paul - [censored]" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Peter B vaguely muttered something like ...
Quoted message said:
<1> The worst offenders for tailgating with lights on full beam were,
yes
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
you guessed, Kensington Tractors. To watch these looneys overtaking on
the
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
hairpins of the Carpathians was interesting, unless they were
approaching
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
head-on of course.
Heheheh .. my 'Kensington tractor' is a little different to those, I guess ... It does actually get used, and abused, off-road a _lot_ ... 😉
Quoted message said:
Imagine how quickly I stopped laughing after stereotyping 4 x 4 drivers and Paul posted pictures of his :-)
Ahbut have you read this gem from today's Ham & High...?
--------------------
WHIFF OF HYPOCRISY ON 4X4S
There is more than a whiff of hypocrisy from readers who rushed to criticise me for driving a 4x4 (Letters September 24 & October 1). Did none of your correspondents ever put their own and their families' interests before those of others> When I take my children to school, the road is so jammed with 4x4s that I have to double park. So why no word of support in your columns from the other drivers? Mr Guy King (October 1) is right that, in an ideal world,drivers should not use mirrors to reverse, but I am not able to see through the rear window when my boys are leaping around in the back.
Helen Deborah Vecht <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
Ahbut have you read this gem from today's Ham & High...?
Quoted message said:
WHIFF OF HYPOCRISY ON 4X4S
There is more than a whiff of hypocrisy from readers who rushed to criticise me for driving a 4x4 (Letters September 24 & October 1). Did none of your correspondents ever put their own and their families' interests before those of others> When I take my children to school, the road is so jammed with 4x4s that I have to double park. So why no word of support in your columns from the other drivers? Mr Guy King (October 1) is right that, in an ideal world,drivers should not use mirrors to reverse, but I am not able to see through the rear window when my boys are leaping around in the back.
Mariana Vellacek, Talbot Rd, London N6
So who will she blame when she reverses into an unsuspecting pedestrian or cyclist?
Helen Deborah Vecht <[email hidden]> wrote in news:[email hidden]:
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
Ahbut have you read this gem from today's Ham & High...?
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
WHIFF OF HYPOCRISY ON 4X4S
There is more than a whiff of hypocrisy from readers who rushed to criticise me for driving a 4x4 (Letters September 24 & October 1). Did none of your correspondents ever put their own and their families' interests before those of others> When I take my children to school, the road is so jammed with 4x4s that I have to double park. So why no word of support in your columns from the other drivers? Mr Guy King (October 1) is right that, in an ideal world,drivers should not use mirrors to reverse, but I am not able to see through the rear window when my boys are leaping around in the back.
Mariana Vellacek, Talbot Rd, London N6
Quoted message said:
So who will she blame when she reverses into an unsuspecting pedestrian or cyclist?
She blamed the car in her initial letter 3 weeks ago, when she said she didn't have many accidents...
I'll ponder a response, as will my friend in Telford...