Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Ellsworth vs. Turner?

Started by Michaelr · · Last activity · 9 posts · 1,256 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
15 May 2003
Last activity
17 May 2003
Original author
Michaelr
Posts
9
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,256
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–9 of 9
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Any thoughts here on a comparison between these two frames? I am leaning towards the Turner Burner
    over the Ellsworth Truth, mainly 'cause its $500 cheaper.

  2. On Thu, 15 May 2003 16:06:41 GMT, michaelR <[email hidden]> wrote:

    |Any thoughts here on a comparison between these two frames? I am leaning |towards the Turner Burner
    over the Ellsworth Truth, mainly 'cause its
    |$500 cheaper.

    I can't imagine how Turner's customer service could be any worse than Ellsworth's horrible
    customer service.

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    IF you get one, just pray that you don't have to deal with Ellsworth for after sale "service."

  3. "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    Speaking of the Romic, I just rebuilt my AD10, and although I now have my rebound dampening back,
    something tells me it may not be long till I lose it again. I have a '99 Truth, which Ellsworth
    tells me can take the Romic just like the newer models. I've heard talk of better small bump
    performance, better adjustability, less pedal induced movement. Would you agree? Did you ride the
    AD10 before switching to the Romic? Anything else I should be aware of?
    --
    Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado (remove .nospam. if replying)

  4. "Craig Brossman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    Speaking of the Romic, I just rebuilt my AD10, and although I now have my rebound dampening back,
    something tells me it may not be long till I lose


    it

    Quoted message said:

    again. I have a '99 Truth, which Ellsworth tells me can take the Romic just like the newer models.
    I've heard talk of better small bump performance, better adjustability, less pedal induced
    movement. Would you agree? Did you ride the AD10 before switching to the Romic? Anything else I
    should be aware


    of?

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado (remove .nospam. if replying)

    Do you run a Lizard Skin on the AD10? I'm on my 3rd season (about 2,200 miles) on mine and it's
    working great still. It keeps dirt out of the seals pretty well but it does require some occasional
    cleaning to make sure any dirt that makes it's way in there gets cleaned out. It does provide some
    good protection.

    Greg

  5. Craig Brossman said:

    "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    Speaking of the Romic, I just rebuilt my AD10, and although I now have my rebound dampening back,
    something tells me it may not be long till I lose it again. I have a '99 Truth, which Ellsworth
    tells me can take the Romic just like the newer models. I've heard talk of better small bump
    performance, better adjustability, less pedal induced movement. Would you agree? Did you ride the
    AD10 before switching to the Romic? Anything else I should be aware of?

    The Romic is simply better all around. More active, more adjustable, better rebound control, etc.

    It truly makes the bikes significantly different.

    Before the Romic I had a Fox Float R and then an RLC.

  6. "Baxter" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Craig Brossman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    Speaking of the Romic, I just rebuilt my AD10, and although I now have


    my

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    rebound dampening back, something tells me it may not be long till I


    lose

    Quoted message said:

    it

    Quoted message said:

    again. I have a '99 Truth, which Ellsworth tells me can take the Romic just


    like

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the newer models. I've heard talk of better small bump performance,


    better

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    adjustability, less pedal induced movement. Would you agree? Did you


    ride

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    the AD10 before switching to the Romic? Anything else I should be aware


    of?

    Quoted message said:

    --
    Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado (remove .nospam. if replying)

    Do you run a Lizard Skin on the AD10? I'm on my 3rd season (about 2,200 miles) on mine and it's
    working great still. It keeps dirt out of the


    seals

    Quoted message said:

    pretty well but it does require some occasional cleaning to make sure any dirt that makes it's way
    in there gets cleaned out. It does provide some good protection.

    Greg


    I did run the Lizard Skin for a while, but decided it trapped more [censored] in there then was necessary.
    My problem was not that it leaked, but somehow one of the pieces warped. It has a seal on the
    outside and a whole in the middle that handles all the rebound and compression dampening. The seal
    in the whole was shot, no rebound dampening.

    After spending way too much money on bikes this year (2 new road bikes, new brakes, lots of new
    clothes, tires, and more) I just have to figure out how to get a new Romic out of my SWMBO.

    And now for the rest of the story ... The easiest way to get this new shock for my bike would be to
    get my wife a new mountain bike. Of course that raises the price by a factor or 5. Having a SO who
    is into biking like I am is usually great, but it does raise the costs a bit.

    --
    Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado (remove .nospam. if replying)

  7. "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Craig Brossman said:

    "P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    The Truth rides well, ,especially if you get rid of the air shock and replace it with a Romic.

    Speaking of the Romic, I just rebuilt my AD10, and although I now have my rebound dampening back,
    something tells me it may not be long till I lose


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    again. I have a '99 Truth, which Ellsworth tells me can take the Romic just like the newer
    models. I've heard talk of better small bump performance,


    better

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    adjustability, less pedal induced movement. Would you agree? Did you ride the AD10 before
    switching to the Romic? Anything else I should be aware


    of?

    Quoted message said:


    The Romic is simply better all around. More active, more adjustable, better rebound control, etc.

    It truly makes the bikes significantly different.

    Before the Romic I had a Fox Float R and then an RLC.


    Thanks, I believe one is in my future ... which probably means a new mountain bike for my wife.

    --
    Craig Brossman, Durango Colorado (remove .nospam. if replying)

  8. RE/

    Quoted message said:

    The Romic is simply better all around. More active, more adjustable, better rebound control, etc.

    It truly makes the bikes significantly different.

    Before the Romic I had a Fox Float R and then an RLC.

    If you were ordering a Romic and one of spring strength cutoff points was at, say 200 lbs and you
    weighed exactly 200, which way would you go? Heavier or lighter spring?
    -----------------------
    PeteCresswell

  9. On Fri, 16 May 2003 23:02:40 GMT, "(Pete Cresswell)" <[email hidden]> wrote:

    |RE/
    |>The Romic is simply better all around. More active, more adjustable, better rebound control, etc.
    |>
    |>It truly makes the bikes significantly different.
    |>
    |>Before the Romic I had a Fox Float R and then an RLC.
    |
    |If you were ordering a Romic and one of spring strength cutoff points was at, |say 200 lbs and you
    weighed exactly 200, which way would you go? Heavier or |lighter spring?

    Damn. Tough question.

    I'm 175 and use a 600# spring on my Truth and the preload adjustment is right in the middle with
    plenty of room either way.

    The preload adjustment range is pretty huge, more than an inch.

    home.pacbell.netromictruth.jpg

    On my ID, because the leverage is different, I only run a 400# spring.

    The guys at Romic are relaly good on the phone. I would give them a call.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.