rec.bicycles.soc · Public discussion

Biker Misbehavior

Started by Mike Vandeman · · Last activity · 17 posts · 1,533 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.bicycles.soc
Published
5 October 2004
Last activity
20 October 2004
Original author
Mike Vandeman
Posts
17
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,533
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–17 of 17
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
    From: Kevin West <[email hidden]>
    Subject: Responce to bikers.

    Please see attached. The following it the same
    document but without formating.

    See this page:
    http://www.marinbike.org/Campaigns/ShareTheRoad/Motorists.htm

    A response to this paper need to be sent. You have my
    permission to use all or any part of this letter on
    your site or in the response.

    • In 30 years of driving I have yet to see a biker
    stop at a stop sign or light if it was clear! This
    includes the very busy Sir Francis Drake Boulevard.
    How can they complain about drivers breaking laws?

    • Many times I have been behind bikers that were
    weaving from the shoulder to the double yellow line.
    When they finally had a wide enough place to drive so
    that I could pass without going over the double line
    the biker again shot over to the yellow line, (just
    like he was asking to be hit). Both times this
    happened, different days, I was about to gun it, but
    because I am a defensive driver I did not assume the
    biker would do the right thing. Anyone else would
    have hit him. A bike site said that only kids weave,
    adults ride in a straight line!

    • Many bikers do not watch where they are going. I
    have been nearly hit while walking on a paved path, by
    a biker who was looking at the ground in front of his
    wheel. I had to jump away, he never saw me!

    • Bikers have claimed that no one has been killed by
    being hit by a bike. This is nonsense. It may not
    happed a lot but it does happen. I can not find the
    statistics on injuries and deaths to walkers every
    year by bikes but I would like to see it.

    Bikers show no signs of self preservation i.e.
    defensive driving. They do not look for erratic
    drivers and do keep to the right. In Marin, there
    were two bikers were killed by drivers in the last few
    years. One driver was sleepy from anti-histamines the
    other was drunk. If the bikers were aware of their
    surroundings they would have noticed the erratic
    driving and got out of the way. (For that matter they
    would not have been in the way in the first place!)
    In the drunken case the woman biker that was hit was
    at the lead of a large group, on a hill, she was the
    only one hit, (there is a concrete shrine for her at
    the collision spot). The driver allegedly crossed
    over the yellow line hit the biker and missed the
    rest. Hard to believe! Since the only witnesses are
    bikers, we will never know what really happened. I
    have no doubt what happened is that the biker that
    was hit was “arrogantly” up head of everyone probably
    weaving near the yellow line and of course not looking
    for oncoming cars. She no doubt never saw what hit
    her. What happened after these two cases were the
    bikers raving that the drivers need to be made aware
    of bikers. Hence the “Share the Road signs”, (one was
    put in our property off the road without permission.)
    Again both drivers were under the influence, no number
    of “Share the road” signs would have made any
    difference in these deaths. The bikers need to the
    trained in defensive driving skills. At this time
    they ride like they are invincible and when they get
    hit blame it on bad drivers. There will always be bad
    drivers! It is up to all of us to drive defensively
    to keep alive! Bikers do not! There are bike trails
    but most bikers do not use them, they would rather
    play chicken with the cars! (There are plenty of
    roads in West Marin that get little traffic.) The
    fact that they bike on busy West Marin roads tells me
    that they are looking for the danger and the adrenalin
    rush that comes with it, (like the bungee jumpers,
    steep mountain bikers, people that jump out of planes,
    drive motorcycles too fast, etc.)

    Bikers are claiming that they are banned from single
    track trails only in Marin, more nonsense. Most
    water district utilities ban bikes from trails. I
    have not personally looked into it but talked to a
    local advocate that did to check up on a bikers claim.
    This person found NO water district in the SF Bay
    Area, that allowed bikes on trails. As a matter of
    fact some did not allow bikes on fire roads because of
    the erosion going into their drinking water and road
    maintenance expense. (I believe it was East Bay
    Municipal District, i.e. Mount Diablo.

    Try driving a car in West Marin on the weekend this it
    what you will see.

    • Bikers in groups biking side by side in twos and
    threes, violation of the law.
    • Bikers going over the speed limit down hills, Whites
    Hill for example.
    • Bikers do not yielding to cars that want to pass.
    They never do! A car or strings of cars will follow
    a biker for miles because it is not legal to cross
    over the double line. (I could not find any vehicle
    code that specifically says bikers can not block
    traffic, i.e. required to pull over if it is not safe
    for cars to pass. (I am sure I read a section along
    time ago that stated that, must have been changed.)
    In any case they have to follow the vehicle code.
    There is as section that says in effect that “A driver
    has to pull over if there are 5 or more cars following
    it”. I have never seen a biker pull over for cars
    and I have seen a dozen or more cars following a
    biker(s) for miles passing many places to pull over.
    Just a message to bikers, “You are in a car and after
    followinga biker for miles, finally getting fed up
    decide to pass. A car comes out of nowhere and you
    have a choice between a head on with a car or hitting
    a biker. What would you choose? The problem the
    accident would be the fault of the driver, because he
    crossedover the double yellow line! I would think
    that the biker would do everything to stay alive like
    pulling over for cars so the drivers do not get
    frustrated and try to pass, unsafely. Silly me,
    that’s not the way bikers think thought! I guess
    they like leaving this world as martyrs.
    • Bikers never stop at stop signs or stop lights if it
    is clear.
    • Bikers driving at night without lights or
    reflectors, this is also in towns.
    • Bikers wearing dark cloths, night and day, very
    common.
    • Bikers riding against traffic, see this a lot on Sir
    Francis Drake Blvd going to work.
    • Bikers riding in the road, when there is a bike
    lane. In West Marin the bikers forced the county to
    widen some of the roads for a “bike lane”. (Right of
    the white line, but still paved.) Where I live,
    Lagunitas, they would have had to take out dozens of
    redwoods to make it wider; they had no problem with
    this! It was stopped by the locals. Through the
    state park the road was not changed since the state
    park system does not have the money, not to mention it
    would require removing a hundreds of redwoods! It is
    amazing the damage and expense the bikers get away
    with, just to satisfy a few people and their carnal
    desires.
    • Bikers on fire roads DO NOT SLOW down when passing
    walkers. There are laws but they vary with the local
    district. (Rarely bikers are sited; there are not
    enough rangers to patrol all the land.) They go too
    fast especially down hill with NO regard for hikers or
    especially kids on bikes. It is very dangerous to
    hike on fire roads with children because of the bikers
    (that is why we do not anymore, it is a shame because
    I hiked these beautiful areas as a kid and it is not
    safe anymore because of bikers!)

    What happens if you give a biker a little honk while
    passing or to tell them you are behind them? The
    chances are you will get yelling and a finger gesture
    (at the least), or car banging at the next stop light,
    not to mention things thrown at the car (someone told
    me that a biker through an apple at their car after
    they honked,. I have yet to see another reaction or
    hear from someone on getting any other reaction. (An
    elderly woman wrote a letter to the editor a number of
    years ago and said that she gave a biker a little honk
    while passing and at the next stop light the biker
    banged on her car and yelled at her, she was
    frightened.)

    Again how can bikers say it is the car drivers that
    are the problem?

    What is this the say about drivers not giving bikers
    the right of way? What right of way do they have?
    They do not have the right of way to keep block the
    road and keep cars from passing or to ride in the
    middle of the road or ride double and triple. They do
    not have the right of way to run stop signs and
    lights. So what are they talking about? Biking is
    good for environmental health Ha, Ha, Ha, bikers drive
    to their biking area, (bikers put more miles on cars
    than the rest of us! Look in West Marin and at all
    the cars with bike racks! A very small number of the
    bike miles are commuting to work and then only if it
    suites them that day and the weather. This article is
    full of nonsense it has to be responded to.

    As usual they distort facts, here is CVC 21202 It
    does not say that a biker can ride in the middle of
    the road, as this article says! It says “As close as
    practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the
    roadway except under any of the following situations:”

    21202. (a) Any person operating a bicycle upon a
    roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of
    traffic moving in the same direction at that time
    shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand
    curb or edge of the roadway except under any of the
    following situations:
    (1) When overtaking and passing another bicycle or
    vehicle proceeding in the same direction.
    (2) When preparing for a left turn at an intersection
    or into a private road or driveway.
    (3) When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions
    (including, but not limited to, fixed or moving
    objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals,
    surface hazards, or substandard width lanes) that make
    it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or
    edge, subject to the provisions of Section 21656. For
    purposes of this section, a "substandard width lane"
    is a lane that is too narrow for a bicycle and a
    vehicle to travel safely side by side within the lane.

    (4) When approaching a place where a right turn is
    authorized.
    (b) Any person operating a bicycle upon a roadway of a
    highway, which highway carries traffic in one
    direction only and has two or more marked traffic
    lanes, may ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of
    that roadway as practicable.
    http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21202.htm site
    of CVC
    http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/vc/tocd11c1a4.htm

    This is just the street bikers. The mountain bikers
    are another problem and in the end will not win
    because if they do get concessions, the damage to the
    trails will be very apparent and despite what they say
    they will eventually be “stopped”.

    Both mountain and street bikers continually spout
    false statistics, unscientific claims and
    un-substantiated claims. They quote parts of laws out
    of context and have their own interruptions of laws.
    Their behavior and attitude says it all. The damage
    to the trails is clear and the danger to hikers even
    on fire roads is clear. (We stopped hiking on fire
    roads year ago because of bikers, it was way too
    dangerous for kids who can not jump out of the way as
    fast as adults.)

    A number of years ago I in a room with a guy that said
    he was the head of some bike group. When another
    person in the room asked him about the bikers riding
    on trails illegally he responded “It is a stupid law
    and we believe we do not have to obey stupid laws.”
    Again their arrogance and defiance of the law is
    showing and will be the end of them eventually. (I
    believe this was the person caught making an illegal
    trail in public land a few months ago!) My neighbor
    had a run in with this guy (probably him) as well many
    years ago. My neighbor put up a gate across the old
    narrow gauge rail right of way after purchasing the
    property. The previous owner let people use it. This
    “trail” runs thru his property. This person showed up
    one day with bolt cutters and cut the chain. When my
    neighbor approached him the guy had a fit and attacked
    my neighbor, saying he had a right to use this
    “trail”. Again this attitude seems to be a norm for
    too many mountain bikers so in the end they will
    loose. I talked to a deputy sheriff that said
    finding bolt cutters on bikers is common and he has
    frequently found pistols on them!

    In the end this mountain biking “fad” will fade, not
    go away. There will eventually be law suits against
    the parks and counties, water districts etc, by
    environmental groups, to stop the damage being done by
    mountain bikes. Insurance companies will eventually
    charge more for people that mountain bike (like
    smokers) or not cover biking accidents. (Who pays for
    the injury to a pedestrian by a bike?) They will
    respond by banning bikes off fire road, and because
    the bikers do not obey laws they do not like, the

  2. Mike Vandeman said:

    . In 30 years of driving I have yet to see a biker
    stop at a stop sign or light if it was clear!

    {18 KBs of ridiculous drivel -- even for Mik&y -- snipped}

    Why are you [censored] about ROAD BIKERS on AM-B, Do(r)c?!? Are you finally
    losing that last tiny flimsy reed of reality?!?

    BTW, how come you never post to any of the rec.* cycling groups, anyway? I
    know RBOR is "moderated" (what a pathetic joke THAT is), but how do they
    keep you out of .misc and .soc and the rest?

    Bill "must really suck to be you" S.

    PS: Those stop signs on the trails are really getting to be a pain. I say
    let's yank 'em out!

  3. On 05 Oct 2004 01:44:19 GMT, [email hidden] (Stephen Baker) wrote:

    ..Mikey V quotes:
    ..
    ..>Bikers do not yielding to cars that want to pass.
    ..
    ..Obviously written by a maroon with no grammar. Try quoting someone who can
    ..write properly - they are more likely to be believable.

    Since you don't know how to use the word "maroon", your comment is null and
    void. You proved that you don't know what you are talking about.

    We all know that mountain bikers would MUCH rather attack the messenger, than
    address the real issues.

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  4. On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 02:09:12 GMT, "B i l l S o r n s o n"
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    ..Mike Vandeman wrote:
    ..> . In 30 years of driving I have yet to see a biker
    ..> stop at a stop sign or light if it was clear!
    ..
    ..{18 KBs of ridiculous drivel -- even for Mik&y -- snipped}
    ..
    ..Why are you [censored] about ROAD BIKERS on AM-B, Do(r)c?!? Are you finally
    ..losing that last tiny flimsy reed of reality?!?
    ..
    ..BTW, how come you never post to any of the rec.* cycling groups, anyway? I
    ..know RBOR is "moderated" (what a pathetic joke THAT is), but how do they
    ..keep you out of .misc and .soc and the rest?
    ..
    ..Bill "must really suck to be you" S.
    ..
    ..PS: Those stop signs on the trails are really getting to be a pain. I say
    ..let's yank 'em out!

    Just as you rip out all the "NO BIKES" signs.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  5. On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:32:11 +1000, Ken in KC
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    ..
    ..B i l l S o r n s o n Wrote:
    ..>
    ..> PS: Those stop signs on the trails are really getting to be a pain. I
    ..> say
    ..> let's yank 'em out!
    ..
    ..Mountain bikers are law breakers who pull stop signs out from the
    ..singletrack trails.

    You conveniently "forgot" about the "NO BIKES" signs.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  6. Mike Vandeman said:

    On 05 Oct 2004 01:44:19 GMT, [email hidden] (Stephen Baker)
    wrote:

    .Mikey V quotes:
    .
    .>Bikers do not yielding to cars that want to pass.
    .
    .Obviously written by a maroon with no grammar. Try quoting someone
    who can .write properly - they are more likely to be believable.

    Since you don't know how to use the word "maroon", your comment is
    null and void. You proved that you don't know what you are talking
    about.

    This is so sad. The poor do(r)c never watched Bugs Bunny -- probably had to
    spend Saturday mornings braiding his mother's underarm hair, before being
    allowed outside to observe the other kids actually PLAYING.

    Bill "someone should have alerted the authorities; disaster /might/ have
    been averted" S.

  7. Mike Vandeman said:

    On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 12:32:11 +1000, Ken in KC
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    .
    .B i l l S o r n s o n Wrote:
    .>
    .> PS: Those stop signs on the trails are really getting to be a
    pain. I .> say
    .> let's yank 'em out!
    .
    .Mountain bikers are law breakers who pull stop signs out from the
    .singletrack trails.

    You conveniently "forgot" about the "NO BIKES" signs.

    Nah, they're more fun to kick and break.

    Bill "and then use to beat innocent passers-by" S.

  8. For a guy that says bikes belong on the road, you make a poor argument of
    the point.

    Actually, for a PhD, you are a poor argument in favor of education, but that
    is not a matter for this newsgroup.

  9. "B i l l S o r n s o n" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Bill "must really suck to be you" S.

    PS: Those stop signs on the trails are really getting to be a pain. I


    say

    Quoted message said:

    let's yank 'em out!

    Please Don't Feed the Troll

  10. "Jeff Strickland" did post (without hint of irony)

    Quoted message said:

    Please Don't Feed the Troll

    !

    Andy Chequer

  11. Jeff Strickland said:

    For a guy that says bikes belong on the road, you make a poor
    argument of the point.

    Actually, for a PhD, you are a poor argument in favor of education,
    but that is not a matter for this newsgroup.

    Please don't feed the troll.

    Bill "that was for Chequer" S.

  12. On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:40:19 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    We all know that mountain bikers would MUCH rather attack the messenger, than
    address the real issues.


    And you would much rather be the center of attention, than address any
    real issues.

    Repeating yourself over and over, and insulting everyone else, does
    not count as addressing anything.

    It's not really about the environment for you, is it?

    Happy trails,
    Gary (net.yogi.bear)
    ------------------------------------------------
    at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

    Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
    Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

  13. "Bill Sornson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Jeff Strickland said:

    For a guy that says bikes belong on the road, you make a poor
    argument of the point.

    Actually, for a PhD, you are a poor argument in favor of education,
    but that is not a matter for this newsgroup.

    Please don't feed the troll.

    Bill "that was for Chequer" S.

    Touche ;-)

    NOTE TO PHD'S
    That means, "you got me".

  14. Bill Sornson said:
    Mike Vandeman said:

    You conveniently "forgot" about the "NO BIKES" signs.

    Nah, they're more fun to kick and break.

    Bill "and then use to beat innocent passers-by" S.

    personally, it's all the "PED X-ING" signs that keep getting in my way...

    annoying!

    bri

  15. On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:35:32 GMT, Gary S. <Idontwantspam@net> wrote:

    ..On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 15:40:19 GMT, Mike Vandeman <[email hidden]>
    ..wrote:
    ..
    ..>We all know that mountain bikers would MUCH rather attack the messenger, than
    ..>address the real issues.
    ..>
    ..And you would much rather be the center of attention, than address any
    ..real issues.
    ..
    ..Repeating yourself over and over, and insulting everyone else, does
    ..not count as addressing anything.

    I don't insult people. I just tell the truth -- something mountain bikers can't
    stand.

    ..It's not really about the environment for you, is it?
    ..
    ..Happy trails,
    ..Gary (net.yogi.bear)
    ..------------------------------------------------
    ..at the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence
    ..
    ..Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
    ..Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  16. On 11 Oct 2004 21:06:12 GMT, [email hidden] (Stephen Baker) wrote:

    ..Mikey-baby says:
    ..
    ..>I don't insult people.
    ..
    ..I think mountain-bikers as a bloc should file a class-action suit against MV,
    ..purely on the basis of having publicly declared that they are less than human.

    Quote me. I don't believe you.

    ..He sure as heck insults mountain-bikers...
    ..
    ..But then again, he is a LIAR. Duh!
    ..
    ..Steve

    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

  17. On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:35:56 +1000, Mr_Kingkillaha
    <[email hidden]> wrote:

    ..
    ...Mr_Kingkillaha wrote:
    ...
    ...>
    ...>MIKE! You idiot! What is the freaking point of this? You are
    .."fighting
    ...>auto dependence", yet you want bikers to sell thier bikes for an
    ..SUV
    ...>instead?
    ..
    .....I didn't say that, liar. Learn to read.
    ..
    ..You implied it. People who quit biking will most likely start driving
    ..cars instead of walking. The SUV is the most likely type of car, based
    ..on they are the current "hot" cars, loved by hollywood types. Learn to
    ..use logic.

    Learn to read.
    ===
    I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
    humans ("pure habitat"😉. Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
    years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

    http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.