Mountain Bikes · Public discussion

Norco

Started by Al McFarlane · · Last activity · 4 posts · 1,889 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Mountain Bikes
Published
14 May 2003
Last activity
14 May 2003
Original author
Al McFarlane
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,889
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I was looking at the Norco Sidewinder, anybody have anything good or bad to say about this
    bike? Thanks

  2. In article <[email hidden]>, "Al McFarlane"

    Quoted message said:

    I was looking at the Norco Sidewinder, anybody have anything good or bad to say about this
    bike? Thanks

    Whoa. The Sidewinder is a very cheap full-suspension bike. It has low-end components throughout, and
    for the same money almost any hardtail would be a better deal.

    norco.comsidewinder.htm

    What are your riding goals? If you're just hitting gravel "trails" and bike paths at the local park,
    you will be better-served by a hardtail in the same price range.

    Staying within Norco's line, something like the Mountaineer...is still a pretty low-end bike, but at
    least it has a half-decent frame and will weigh about 10 pounds less than the Sidewinder's crappy
    "hi-tensile" (bikespeak for "worst frame material"😉 frame and avoids its useless low-grade rear
    suspension:

    norco.commountaineer.htm

    I would dare to take the Mountaineer out on a "real" MTB trail with some expectation that it
    wouldn't fold in half on general principles.

    Norco makes lots of good, high-end bikes above this range, probably starting with the Wolverine or
    somewhere around there. But the Sidewinder is just garbage so that they can offer their bike shop
    distributors a cheap competitor for Wal-Mart bikes.

    In this price range, the best deals are used bikes, followed by new hardtails.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  3. Can you tell me what you think of the Norco Scrambler? I bought my son one 2 years ago, made of
    Chromoly, and we bought another one this year (another son) made of Aluminum.
    norco.comscrambler.htm Thanks for your input.

    "Ryan Cousineau" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, "Al McFarlane"

    Quoted message said:

    I was looking at the Norco Sidewinder, anybody have anything good or bad


    to

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    say about this bike? Thanks

    Whoa. The Sidewinder is a very cheap full-suspension bike. It has low-end components throughout,
    and for the same money almost any hardtail would be a better deal.

    norco.comsidewinder.htm

    What are your riding goals? If you're just hitting gravel "trails" and bike paths at the local
    park, you will be better-served by a hardtail in the same price range.

    Staying within Norco's line, something like the Mountaineer...is still a pretty low-end bike, but
    at least it has a half-decent frame and will weigh about 10 pounds less than the Sidewinder's
    crappy "hi-tensile" (bikespeak for "worst frame material"😉 frame and avoids its useless low-grade
    rear suspension:

    norco.commountaineer.htm

    I would dare to take the Mountaineer out on a "real" MTB trail with some expectation that it
    wouldn't fold in half on general principles.

    Norco makes lots of good, high-end bikes above this range, probably starting with the Wolverine or
    somewhere around there. But the Sidewinder is just garbage so that they can offer their bike shop
    distributors a cheap competitor for Wal-Mart bikes.

    In this price range, the best deals are used bikes, followed by new hardtails.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

  4. In article said:
    Quoted message said:

    Norco makes lots of good, high-end bikes above this range, probably starting with the Wolverine
    or somewhere around there. But the Sidewinder is just garbage so that they can offer their bike
    shop distributors a cheap competitor for Wal-Mart bikes.

    In this price range, the best deals are used bikes, followed by new hardtails.

    Quoted message said:

    Can you tell me what you think of the Norco Scrambler? I bought my son one 2 years ago, made of
    Chromoly, and we bought another one this year (another son) made of Aluminum.
    norco.comscrambler.htm Thanks for your input.

    Well, it's a hardtail, which is good. The frame is not in their top line, and the components (Altus
    and worse) are below the range I would consider for my bike. The fork is heavy and undamped.

    But for a kid? unless he's racing XC or hucking 5-footers, no problem. I hear from people who know
    better that Shimano's low-end stuff is fairly durable in practice. This bike is already more capable
    than any number of horrid Dunlop 747s or whatever the local version of "dual-sus" department-store
    wretchedness is in your area. The greatest weakness isprobably the fork, but that can be upgraded as
    a reward when your son makes his school's XC team. 7 speeds is obsolete technology, but I race an
    ancient Marin with 7-speed and an elastomer fork, and I beat people on lighter, newer bikes. The
    only impediment is that descending is scary because the fork is wretched and I have no technique.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau, [email hidden] sfu.ca~rcousine President, Fabrizio Mazzoleni Fan Club

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.