Is this on currently? Recently I've heard of issues with JohnB, Jon Senior, Vernon.
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
Is this on currently? Recently I've heard of issues with JohnB, Jon Senior, Vernon.
Quoted message said:
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
"Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Is this on currently? Recently I've heard of issues with JohnB, Jon Senior, Vernon.
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
Sorry to hear of your troubles. But the way you've written this makes me curious - what exactly happened? Why did he want to either pringle your wheel or hit you instead? Was this a motorist or ped or was it something else and not road rage at all? Just curious.
"Richard Goodman" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
"Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Is this on currently? Recently I've heard of issues with JohnB, Jon Senior, Vernon.
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although
it
Quoted message said:
Quoted message said:
was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
Sorry to hear of your troubles. But the way you've written this makes me curious - what exactly happened? Why did he want to either pringle your wheel or hit you instead? Was this a motorist or ped or was it something else and not road rage at all? Just curious.
Motorist. Narrow lane, we had a collision, his mirror went bang. I stopped to exchange details, he came after me.
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:52:20 +0100, "Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote (more or less):
Quoted message said:
Is this on currently? Recently I've heard of issues with JohnB, Jon Senior, Vernon.
I've been away for a couple of weeks. Can someone give me goglable refs for J & J's incidents.
Quoted message said:
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
Sorry to hear about yours. Hope you had noted his details.
Hope you got the most minor possible bruise or cut, so that he's done a hit'n'run from an accident involving injury.
I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front wheel. He did say he was going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been very heplful).
Quoted message said:
Motorist. Narrow lane, we had a collision, his mirror went bang. I stopped to exchange details, he came after me.
So why did he say he was going to the police then?
"Simonb" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Clive George said:
Quoted message said:
> I've just joined the fray - well, it was an attack on my bike, > although it was abandon the bike or get hit. Pringled the front > wheel. He did say he was > going to plod, but I wasn't entirely surprised to not find him > there. Oh well, we'll see what happens. (previously NYCP have been > very heplful).
Quoted message said:
Motorist. Narrow lane, we had a collision, his mirror went bang. I stopped to exchange details, he came after me.
So why did he say he was going to the police then?
He didn't say why, he just said he was going there (more than once). I think he thought the collision was my fault. I think his brain kicked in after he left the scene when he realised attacking me wouldn't exactly support his case.
"Clive George" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...
Quoted message said:
Motorist. Narrow lane, we had a collision, his mirror went bang. I stopped to exchange details, he came after me.
Ah, that explains it. Too bad. That's the sort of situation where it could be hard to establish liability - at best 50/50 probably. Petty damage too no doubt, not really even worth the aggro of exchanging details and arguing about it. Anyway anyone who passes that close to a cyclist deserves to have their mirror broken 😉 I think unless _I'd_ sustained any damage I thought worth trying to claim for I'd have taken that as sufficient justification to not bother stopping and disappear rapidly from the scene!