"chickasmith" <[email hidden]> writes:
<snip>
Quoted message said:Considering the school has been there for the best part of a few decades (dont actually know)
and in one instance, it is asked that you give back some property that cyclists and other
'unsavoury' types just to have a 'trail' go through because of 'history', I think the right
decision has been made.
I strongly disagree with your statements here. For one, the land does NOT belong to the school (it
is public land), so being asked to 'give it back' is not quite the reality that you are
(mis)representing.
Bicycle Victoria has looked extensively at the issues involved. Below, I paraphrase some of
their concerns.
Despite the irresponsible claims by school Principal Bernard Dobson (that you are simply parroting
off here), that the trail would bring "paedophiles and drug dealers" into Mt Lilydale College, an
article in "The Age" newspaper has revealed that police from Lilydale and Warburton believe that the
area around the school is safe.
Evidence from cyclists and other trail users is that the trail is very safe, especially as there are
many users and no motor vehicles. My personal experience of riding the trail strongly supports this
view. Regardless, plans for the trail around Lilydale included a proposal for double fencing to
separate the trail from the school grounds.
International experience, especially from the US where the Rails to Trails Conservancy keeps
statistics on more than 1,000 trails, shows they are usually safer than the areas through which
they pass.
More than 100 schools around Melbourne enjoy the benefits of having public trail access. Why is Mt
Lilydale College so different?
Quoted message said:Would you let a 'trail' go through your backyard, where not only cyclists would come through, but
anyone else? I'd think not ...
Absolutely. I'm a strong advocate of public trails. If I were lucky enough to have a railtrail pass
through my backyard, I would be grateful for having such easy access to it.
Andrew