UK and Europe · Public discussion

Cycle painted on road?

Started by Paul - [censored] · · Last activity · 15 posts · 640 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
UK and Europe
Published
14 September 2004
Last activity
14 September 2004
Original author
Paul - [censored]
Posts
15
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
640
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–15 of 15
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Colin Davidson vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed
    several such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and
    I'm curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    Without supporting roadside signage I think it means the council had an
    excesss of paint and a bright idea .. 😉

    --
    Paul ...

    (8(|) Homer Rules !!!

    "A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."

  2. Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed several
    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

  3. Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself?

    It might mean that this is part of a cycle route?
    I mean a cycle route like 'Anglesey 2km turn left here'.
    In London the cycle symbol is painted on roads which are part of the LCN.
    If I'm not wrong, they are there as confirmation that you're on the right
    road, and probably to warn drivers to take care.
    I am willing to stand corrected.

  4. "Colin Davidson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed


    several

    Quoted message said:

    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    It might mark the spot where a cyclist was flattened by a big truck?

    Mark Burch

  5. Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed several
    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    Possibly National Cycle Network. I know NCN 4, at least, has them.

    --
    Keith Willoughby http://flat222.org/keith/
    Husker Du Du Du, Captain Beefheart, ELO

  6. Keith Willoughby said:


    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed several
    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    Possibly National Cycle Network. I know NCN 4, at least, has them.

    They are used quite widely in Winchester - but they are not on NCN routes.
    They enable the council to proclaim how much they do for cycling.
    It helps them puff their chests out.

    John B

  7. ScumOfTheRoad <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself?

    It might mean that this is part of a cycle route?
    I mean a cycle route like 'Anglesey 2km turn left here'.
    In London the cycle symbol is painted on roads which are part of the LCN.
    If I'm not wrong, they are there as confirmation that you're on the right
    road, and probably to warn drivers to take care.
    I am willing to stand corrected.

    Your take on the painted cycles in London sounds about correct. I prefer them
    to the cycle tracks for the simple reason that they seem to indicate to
    drivers that they should expect cycles as part of the traffic rather than
    being segregated. They are also painted a reasonable distance out from the
    kerb.

    --
    Chris

  8. Monkey Hanger vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    ScumOfTheRoad <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:
    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd
    expect there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself?

    It might mean that this is part of a cycle route?
    I mean a cycle route like 'Anglesey 2km turn left here'.
    In London the cycle symbol is painted on roads which are part of the LCN.
    If I'm not wrong, they are there as confirmation that you're on the right
    road, and probably to warn drivers to take care.
    I am willing to stand corrected.

    Your take on the painted cycles in London sounds about correct. I prefer
    them to the cycle tracks for the simple reason that they seem to indicate
    to drivers that they should expect cycles as part of the traffic rather
    than being segregated. They are also painted a reasonable distance out
    from the kerb.

    In that light they seem 'a good idea'. Why, then, as a cyclist and a
    driver, do I not already know about this addition to our road markings ?

    --
    Paul ...

    (8(|) Homer Rules !!!

    "A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."

  9. JohnB said:
    Keith Willoughby said:


    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed several
    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    Possibly National Cycle Network. I know NCN 4, at least, has them.

    They are used quite widely in Winchester - but they are not on NCN routes.
    They enable the council to proclaim how much they do for cycling.
    It helps them puff their chests out.

    Well, I reckon they're better than blue signs on pavements or 50 cm
    wide strips of coloured tarmac. They clearly announce to cyclists and
    drivers that the road place where cyclists should be.

    Of course, none of the above give any assistance at all where it is
    actually needed; at junctions. It seems that imagination and political
    will seem to evaporate if anything that might de-prioritise the car is
    required.

  10. In message <[email hidden]>

    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself?

    Tends to be placed where there ought to be a cycle lane but there is not
    enough road space. (an advisory cycle lane would be better but is a bit too
    definite for many councils)

    Regards Paul.

    --
    CTC Right to Ride Representative for Richmond upon Thames

  11. "Paul - [censored]" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:2qov80F128odaU1@uni-
    berlin.de:

    Quoted message said:

    Monkey Hanger vaguely muttered something like ...

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your take on the painted cycles in London sounds about correct. I prefer
    them to the cycle tracks for the simple reason that they seem to indicate
    to drivers that they should expect cycles as part of the traffic rather
    than being segregated. They are also painted a reasonable distance out
    from the kerb.

    In that light they seem 'a good idea'. Why, then, as a cyclist and a
    driver, do I not already know about this addition to our road markings ?

    Good question. They don't appear to be in the highway code. Presumably they
    have no legal force, although I'm not sure exactly what they would be used to
    enforce. Probably about the same as signs reminding drivers to take a break
    when they feel tired, i.e. "common sense" on a sign.

    --
    Chris

  12. Monkey Hanger vaguely muttered something like ...

    Quoted message said:

    "Paul - [censored]" <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:2qov80F128odaU1@uni- berlin.de:

    Quoted message said:

    Monkey Hanger vaguely muttered something like ...

    <snip>

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Your take on the painted cycles in London sounds about correct. I prefer
    them to the cycle tracks for the simple reason that they seem to
    indicate to drivers that they should expect cycles as part of the
    traffic rather than being segregated. They are also painted a
    reasonable distance out from the kerb.

    In that light they seem 'a good idea'. Why, then, as a cyclist and a
    driver, do I not already know about this addition to our road markings ?

    Good question. They don't appear to be in the highway code. Presumably
    they have no legal force, although I'm not sure exactly what they would
    be used to enforce. Probably about the same as signs reminding drivers to
    take a break when they feel tired, i.e. "common sense" on a sign.

    swotifort ...

    Might be a bit of an exercise to have a wander round tomorrow and see what
    other signs and markings I also don't know about, and which aren't in HC ..
    😉

    --
    Paul ...

    (8(|) Homer Rules !!!

    "A [censored] is a [censored], no matter what mode of transport they're using."

  13. Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself? We passed several
    such painted on bikes in Anglesey on a stretch of road there, and I'm
    curious to know whether they actually meant anything.

    I think this is what Jeremy Parker has referred to as a bike un-lane.

    --
    Dave...

    Get a bicycle. You will not regret it. If you live. - Mark Twain

  14. Paul Luton said:

    In message <[email hidden]>

    Colin Davidson said:

    Does a cycle painted on the road, in about the position where you'd expect
    there to be a cycle lane, have any significance in itself?

    Tends to be placed where there ought to be a cycle lane but there is not
    enough road space. (an advisory cycle lane would be better but is a bit too
    definite for many councils)

    I'm likely to be party to the painting of some of these. The message I
    want them to convey is 'chamge lane if you want to overtake a
    cyclist'. Those who design the scheme may have other ideas.

    Colin McKenzie
    --
    The great advantage of not trusting statistics is that
    it leaves you free to believe the damned lies instead!

  15. Quoted message said:

    I'm likely to be party to the painting of some of these. The message I
    want them to convey is 'chamge lane if you want to overtake a
    cyclist'. Those who design the scheme may have other ideas.

    Colin McKenzie

    If I were you, I'd have the urge to use the paint to emulate Le Tour, and have
    much more *interesting* pictures painted along the road ;-)

    Cheers, helen s

    --This is an invalid email address to avoid spam--
    to get correct one remove fame & fortune
    h*$el*$$e*nd**$o$ts**i*$*$m*m$o*n*s@$*a$o*l.c**$om$

    --Due to financial crisis the light at the end of the tunnel is switched off--

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.