Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

new Bontrager seatpost.

Started by Callistus Valerius · · Last activity · 7 posts · 444 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
2 September 2004
Last activity
3 September 2004
Original author
Callistus Valerius
Posts
7
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
444
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–7 of 7
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Anyone have any experience with the new Bontrager seatpost with the
    clamp bolt that comes form the side and not from underneath. Review on
    cyclenews was interesting.

    I've had horrible experiences with Weyless seatposts from Supergo. I've
    had 3 seats fall off of two separate designs of theirs. The aluminin
    version looks like it has a sturdy big clamp bolt, but it sheared. The
    carbon seatpost has a hollow bolt (how flaky is that?) and two of those
    sheared. They SUCK, big time.

  2. This design was employed by softride some years ago. Indeed, it is
    mechanically a very poor design. In order to prevent the saddle from
    tilting fore \ aft, a tremendous amount of clamping force must be applied.
    Thus, the bolt is subjected to severe shearing stress that inevitably leads
    to strain, yield, then failure. I experienced this myself back during my
    naive softride days of the mid 90's. Bontrager should abandon this
    answer-to-a-question-nobody-asked design.

    --
    --------------------------
    Andre Charlebois
    AGC-PC support
    http://agc-pc.tripod.com
    BPE, MCSE4.0, CNA, A+

    "Callistus Valerius" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Anyone have any experience with the new Bontrager seatpost with the
    clamp bolt that comes form the side and not from underneath. Review on
    cyclenews was interesting.

    I've had horrible experiences with Weyless seatposts from Supergo.


    I've

    Quoted message said:

    had 3 seats fall off of two separate designs of theirs. The aluminin
    version looks like it has a sturdy big clamp bolt, but it sheared. The
    carbon seatpost has a hollow bolt (how flaky is that?) and two of those
    sheared. They SUCK, big time.

  3. "Andre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This design was employed by softride some years ago. Indeed, it is
    mechanically a very poor design. In order to prevent the saddle from
    tilting fore \ aft, a tremendous amount of clamping force must be applied.
    Thus, the bolt is subjected to severe shearing stress that inevitably


    leads

    Quoted message said:

    to strain, yield, then failure. I experienced this myself back during my
    naive softride days of the mid 90's. Bontrager should abandon this
    answer-to-a-question-nobody-asked design.


    Is a two bolt, from underneath, the best design in your opinion? Or
    what is the best design? I'm getting sick of having saddles falling off, by
    luck I haven't been de-balled.

  4. Callistus Valerius said:
    Quoted message said:


    Is a two bolt, from underneath, the best design in your opinion? Or
    what is the best design? I'm getting sick of having saddles falling off, by
    luck I haven't been de-balled.

    Get a Thomson and stop worrying.

  5. In my opinion, the two bolt design tends to be somewhat flimsy, with narrow
    cross section bolts. This clamp design also typically lacks setback (except
    for the thompson layback design, which looks somewhat lame, in my opinion).
    I would definitely go with the traditional one bolt design.

    --
    --------------------------
    Andre Charlebois
    AGC-PC support
    http://agc-pc.tripod.com
    BPE, MCSE4.0, CNA, A+

    "Callistus Valerius" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Andre" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This design was employed by softride some years ago. Indeed, it is
    mechanically a very poor design. In order to prevent the saddle from
    tilting fore \ aft, a tremendous amount of clamping force must be


    applied.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    Thus, the bolt is subjected to severe shearing stress that inevitably


    leads

    Quoted message said:

    to strain, yield, then failure. I experienced this myself back during


    my

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    naive softride days of the mid 90's. Bontrager should abandon this
    answer-to-a-question-nobody-asked design.


    Is a two bolt, from underneath, the best design in your opinion? Or
    what is the best design? I'm getting sick of having saddles falling off,


    by

    Quoted message said:

    luck I haven't been de-balled.

  6. Callistus Valerius said:

    Anyone have any experience with the new Bontrager seatpost with the
    clamp bolt that comes form the side and not from underneath. Review on
    cyclenews was interesting.

    I've had horrible experiences with Weyless seatposts from Supergo. I've
    had 3 seats fall off of two separate designs of theirs. The aluminin
    version looks like it has a sturdy big clamp bolt, but it sheared. The
    carbon seatpost has a hollow bolt (how flaky is that?) and two of those
    sheared. They SUCK, big time.

    Love it.

    I've had a Bontrager Race Lite on my bike for about 1000 miles. Easy
    to adjust, never slips, doesn't require a scary tight bolt, and
    beautiful too. Much easier to put a seat on than my old Thomson, nice
    as that post is.

    I wondered about potential angle slip. I spoke with the tech support
    guys at Trek and apparently during development of this post the
    engineers tried different combinations of finishes on the mating
    surfaces. They wanted secure grip when the bolt was tight, but also
    easy release when the bolt was loosened. The finish looks to me like
    machining on the female part, and bead blast plus anodizing on the
    male part. Even greased (the post comes with a grease film on the
    conical surfaces) I've had no hint of slipping.

    Here's the web site:
    http://www.bontrager.com/posts/detail.asp?id=55&pt=8

    By the way, because the adjustment is conical the angle is infinitely
    adjustable, which means the post can be flipped around to face forward
    without any restrictions on seat tilt.

  7. Callistus Valerius said:

    Anyone have any experience with the new Bontrager seatpost with the
    clamp bolt that comes form the side and not from underneath. Review on
    cyclenews was interesting.

    I've had horrible experiences with Weyless seatposts from Supergo. I've
    had 3 seats fall off of two separate designs of theirs. The aluminin
    version looks like it has a sturdy big clamp bolt, but it sheared. The
    carbon seatpost has a hollow bolt (how flaky is that?) and two of those
    sheared. They SUCK, big time.

    Love it.

    I've had a Bontrager Race Lite on my bike for about 1000 miles. Easy
    to adjust, never slips, doesn't require a scary tight bolt, and
    beautiful too. Much easier to put a seat on than my old Thomson, nice
    as that post is.

    I wondered about potential angle slip. I spoke with the tech support
    guys at Trek and apparently during development of this post the
    engineers tried different combinations of finishes on the mating
    surfaces. They wanted secure grip when the bolt was tight, but also
    easy release when the bolt was loosened. The finish looks to me like
    machining on the female part, and bead blast plus anodizing on the
    male part. Even greased (the post comes with a grease film on the
    conical surfaces) I've had no hint of slipping.

    Here's the web site:
    http://www.bontrager.com/posts/detail.asp?id=55&pt=8

    By the way, because the adjustment is conical the angle is infinitely
    adjustable, which means the post can be flipped around to face forward
    without any restrictions on seat tilt.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.