Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Yellow Jersey clarification needed

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 636 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
7 July 2005
Last activity
7 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
636
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi there all,
    Was reading Cadel's web site http://www.cadel.com.au/ and
    he mentions that tactically, it's to his teams *disadvantage*
    that CSC did not keep the yellow jersey ("the attacks will be coming
    now"😉.

    I dont get it. Anyone can clarify this?

    Why would it differ from if CSC did keep the Yellow?

    Thanks,
    AC

  2. Quoted message said:

    Hi there all,
    Was reading Cadel's web site http://www.cadel.com.au/ and
    he mentions that tactically, it's to his teams *disadvantage*
    that CSC did not keep the yellow jersey ("the attacks will be coming
    now"😉.

    I dont get it. Anyone can clarify this?

    Because everyone knows that Discovery won't want
    to keep the jersey, so they don't have to do all
    the work, so they'll let the right attacks go so some
    non-threating rider will get the jersey and then their
    team will defend it. This means the sprinters
    teams then have to work more if they want
    bunch finishes.

    CSC wanted to keep it, so they would chase down
    everything.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.