I said:Most newsreaders
For starters, try http://www.newsleecher.com/ (shareware) or Grabit from
http://www.shemes.com/ (free).
--
Firefox Browser - Rediscover the web - http://getffox.com/
Thunderbird E-mail and Newsgroups - http://gettbird.com/
Road Cycling · Public discussion
Wrapup TDF show?
Thread navigation
Jump through the discussion
Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- Road Cycling
- Published
- 25 July 2005
- Last activity
- 26 July 2005
- Original author
- Kovie
- Posts
- 118
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 2,250
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
"Steven L. Sheffield" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
On 07/25/2005 08:27 AM, in article
[email hidden], "Tom Kunich"Quoted message said:
Tom Danielson is a big unknown but since he won the Tour of Georgia he
has to be considered as a possible GT winner. Popovych looked good in
his first Tour but no one on Discovery could look too good standing in
Lance's great shadow.Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Let me guess, in your universe "is a big unknown" means that he "is a big
known"?Quoted message said:
TD could very well be the next big American GT star, but I think his
performances in the Tour de Langkawi speak louder than his TdG win.Yeah, and we saw how brilliantly Lance rode in the Tour of Langdawi. As well
as other early season races. Why that is probably his defining moments. Not
to mention a 3rd in the Vuelta. Why that Lance really stood out in GT's
before 1999. Oh, wait, he did win the Tour de Trump. Just like Danielson won
the Tour de Georgia. Do you suppose that MIGHT mean something? -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
Steven L. Sheffield said:
Why does someone who wins a 6-day race against America's "finest" riders
like ClitPro have to be considered a possible GT winner?Mabe because he can climb and can time trial and is training toward
being a GT rider/winner
DR -
"k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why would ESPN even care about the Tour? They bailed many years ago.
Because, um, they're a sports channel, and while they no longer carry daily
stages, I can see why they'd be interested in doing a wrapup special,
especially with Lance's retirement. In the past OLN didn't carry the final
stage (I think CBS or ESPN did), so there's a precedent for another channel
butting at or near the end, when viewership is likely to be greater.Quoted message said:
In the past OLN has had a wrap-up show.
Past isn't always prologue, I suppose. Perhaps Al Trautwig ran off with
Kirsten Gum...Quoted message said:
-Ken
I'm sure that someone will do a wrapup show eventually, but I guess we'll
have to wait and see. Personally, I'd like to see the sort of film-based
sports documentary on Lance that used to be done on the olympics, or perhaps
an Imax film. Obviously, a topic deserving of this.--
Kovie
[email hidden] -
"k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why would ESPN even care about the Tour? They bailed many years ago.
Because, um, they're a sports channel, and while they no longer carry daily
stages, I can see why they'd be interested in doing a wrapup special,
especially with Lance's retirement. In the past OLN didn't carry the final
stage (I think CBS or ESPN did), so there's a precedent for another channel
butting at or near the end, when viewership is likely to be greater.Quoted message said:
In the past OLN has had a wrap-up show.
Past isn't always prologue, I suppose. Perhaps Al Trautwig ran off with
Kirsten Gum...Quoted message said:
-Ken
I'm sure that someone will do a wrapup show eventually, but I guess we'll
have to wait and see. Personally, I'd like to see the sort of film-based
sports documentary on Lance that used to be done on the olympics, or perhaps
an Imax film. Obviously, a topic deserving of this.--
Kovie
[email hidden] -
"k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why would ESPN even care about the Tour? They bailed many years ago.
Because, um, they're a sports channel, and while they no longer carry daily
stages, I can see why they'd be interested in doing a wrapup special,
especially with Lance's retirement. In the past OLN didn't carry the final
stage (I think CBS or ESPN did), so there's a precedent for another channel
butting at or near the end, when viewership is likely to be greater.Quoted message said:
In the past OLN has had a wrap-up show.
Past isn't always prologue, I suppose. Perhaps Al Trautwig ran off with
Kirsten Gum...Quoted message said:
-Ken
I'm sure that someone will do a wrapup show eventually, but I guess we'll
have to wait and see. Personally, I'd like to see the sort of film-based
sports documentary on Lance that used to be done on the olympics, or perhaps
an Imax film. Obviously, a topic deserving of this.--
Kovie
[email hidden] -
"k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why would ESPN even care about the Tour? They bailed many years ago.
Because, um, they're a sports channel, and while they no longer carry daily
stages, I can see why they'd be interested in doing a wrapup special,
especially with Lance's retirement. In the past OLN didn't carry the final
stage (I think CBS or ESPN did), so there's a precedent for another channel
butting at or near the end, when viewership is likely to be greater.Quoted message said:
In the past OLN has had a wrap-up show.
Past isn't always prologue, I suppose. Perhaps Al Trautwig ran off with
Kirsten Gum...Quoted message said:
-Ken
I'm sure that someone will do a wrapup show eventually, but I guess we'll
have to wait and see. Personally, I'd like to see the sort of film-based
sports documentary on Lance that used to be done on the olympics, or perhaps
an Imax film. Obviously, a topic deserving of this.--
Kovie
[email hidden] -
"k.papai" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...Quoted message said:
Why would ESPN even care about the Tour? They bailed many years ago.
Because, um, they're a sports channel, and while they no longer carry daily
stages, I can see why they'd be interested in doing a wrapup special,
especially with Lance's retirement. In the past OLN didn't carry the final
stage (I think CBS or ESPN did), so there's a precedent for another channel
butting at or near the end, when viewership is likely to be greater.Quoted message said:
In the past OLN has had a wrap-up show.
Past isn't always prologue, I suppose. Perhaps Al Trautwig ran off with
Kirsten Gum...Quoted message said:
-Ken
I'm sure that someone will do a wrapup show eventually, but I guess we'll
have to wait and see. Personally, I'd like to see the sort of film-based
sports documentary on Lance that used to be done on the olympics, or perhaps
an Imax film. Obviously, a topic deserving of this.--
Kovie
[email hidden]
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.