Home Road Cycling Worlds thru WRR
Thread details
What we know about this thread
Original section Road Cycling
Published 12 October 2003
Last activity 13 October 2003
Original author Dan Connelly
Posts 5
Discussion status Public discussion
Total views 600
Views / 30 days 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Showing posts 1–5 of 5 Posts remain in their original chronological order.
Original post Dan Connelly
Archived post
12 October 2003, 00:17 UTC
#1
Okay, here's my scoring system, not checked for errors:
NED 78 SWE 76 GBR 65 UZ 45 GER 43 SPA 25 AUS 20 BEL 18 RUS 19 DEN 6 CZE 6 UKR 2
Points available in Men's RR : 150, 60, 30 for 1, 2, 3. So winner takes all. All other events are for minor placings.
Women's RR was 75, 30, 15.
Dan
Ewoud Dronkert
Archived post
Robert Chung
Archived post
13 October 2003, 14:18 UTC
#3
Ewoud Dronkert said: Dan Connelly said: Okay, here's my scoring system, not checked for errors:
phys.uu.nl hamilton.php Open ↗
Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?
Ewoud Dronkert
Archived post
13 October 2003, 14:18 UTC
#4
Robert Chung said: Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?
He would if for him speed equaled prestige and importance. Apparently not. Btw, I did think he had W and U23 the wrong way 'round.
Dan Connelly
Archived post
13 October 2003, 15:18 UTC
#5
That's correct. Frankly, I think the Jr men could be competitive with the women. But I gave the women's race a coefficient of 5, and the junior men a coefficient of 1.
Ewoud Dronkert said: Robert Chung said: Wouldn't Dan weight the women's events about as much as Cat 3 men's events?
He would if for him speed equaled prestige and importance. Apparently not. Btw, I did think he had W and U23 the wrong way 'round.
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users
·
0 guests
· 0 bots
· 0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.