Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Working out climb difficuties

Started by Tony Fisher · · Last activity · 3 posts · 620 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
30 July 2004
Last activity
31 July 2004
Original author
Tony Fisher
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
620
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. How do they work out a climb difficulty, IE the steepness of it.

    Like I am in Brisbane, what would Mt Cootha be? as compared to the TDF's Alp
    De Huez

  2. Tony Fisher said:

    How do they work out a climb difficulty, IE the steepness of it.

    Like I am in Brisbane, what would Mt Cootha be? as compared to the TDF's Alp
    De Huez

    Comparing the numbers from www.cycle2max.com and from climbs in the TDF (current and past years), I reckon Mt Coot-tha would rate a Cat 4 or Cat 3. It is not very long (about 2.5km), but is quite steep (~10%).

    Ritch.

    PS. I just looked at the numbers for Mt Glorious: 270m up in only 1.8km. If those numbers are right, then I fell better for finding it so damned hard! 15%? sheesh!

  3. Tony Fisher said:

    How do they work out a climb difficulty, IE the steepness of it.

    You seem to assume that difficulty = steepness? It seems to be more
    a matter of total climb though. I found the FAQ here:

    http://www.faqs.org/faqs/bicycles-faq/part1/section-22.html

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.