Why is it that road cyclists, who pride themselves on their speed and efficiency, seem to fall apart at the seams when faced with anything other than butter-smooth asphalt? Is it really that difficult to adapt to a little bit of rough road, or is there something fundamentally flawed in the way that road bikes are designed and ridden?
Its not like mountain bikers are given a free pass to ride on perfectly groomed trails - theyre expected to be able to handle rocks, roots, and all manner of other obstacles, and yet they seem to do just fine. So whats the difference? Is it the bikes, the riders, or something else entirely?
And dont even get me started on the so-called endurance road bikes that are supposedly designed to handle rougher roads. If theyre so great, why do their riders still seem to be complaining about every little bump and pothole?
It seems to me that theres a fundamental disconnect between the way that road cyclists think they should be riding, and the way that the real world actually works. Maybe its time for roadies to take a page out of the mountain bikers playbook and learn to handle a little bit of rough stuff.
Its not like mountain bikers are given a free pass to ride on perfectly groomed trails - theyre expected to be able to handle rocks, roots, and all manner of other obstacles, and yet they seem to do just fine. So whats the difference? Is it the bikes, the riders, or something else entirely?
And dont even get me started on the so-called endurance road bikes that are supposedly designed to handle rougher roads. If theyre so great, why do their riders still seem to be complaining about every little bump and pothole?
It seems to me that theres a fundamental disconnect between the way that road cyclists think they should be riding, and the way that the real world actually works. Maybe its time for roadies to take a page out of the mountain bikers playbook and learn to handle a little bit of rough stuff.