Is it truly necessary for mountain bikers to carry their entire toolbox on every ride, or is this just a lingering habit from the early days of the sport when bikes were less reliable and spare parts less accessible?
Considering the advancements in mountain bike design and technology, shouldnt riders be able to identify the most critical tools and spares required for their specific ride and bike setup, rather than carrying the entire toolbox?
What are the chances of encountering a situation that requires a full toolbox, and wouldnt the weight and bulk of carrying all those tools be a hindrance to the ride itself?
Are there any specific types of mountain biking, such as enduro or downhill, where carrying a full toolbox is more justified due to the higher risk of mechanical failure or the remoteness of the riding location?
How do professional mechanics and experienced riders determine which tools and spares are essential to carry, and are there any general guidelines or best practices that can be applied to help riders make this decision?
Considering the advancements in mountain bike design and technology, shouldnt riders be able to identify the most critical tools and spares required for their specific ride and bike setup, rather than carrying the entire toolbox?
What are the chances of encountering a situation that requires a full toolbox, and wouldnt the weight and bulk of carrying all those tools be a hindrance to the ride itself?
Are there any specific types of mountain biking, such as enduro or downhill, where carrying a full toolbox is more justified due to the higher risk of mechanical failure or the remoteness of the riding location?
How do professional mechanics and experienced riders determine which tools and spares are essential to carry, and are there any general guidelines or best practices that can be applied to help riders make this decision?