Why I continue to choose rim brakes for my fixed-gear crit racing bike

[wsharp]

Whats the deal with rim brakes still being a viable choice for fixed-gear crit racing bikes? I mean, I get it, theyre lighter, simpler, and offer better modulation, but arent they, you know, kinda... ancient technology at this point? Disc brakes have come a long way in terms of reliability, power, and heat management, so whats the reasoning behind sticking with rim brakes? Is it purely a weight weenie thing, or are there other factors at play? Are the trade-offs in terms of stopping power and wet weather performance really worth the minimal weight savings? And what about the whole aero argument - dont rim brakes create more drag than discs? Or is that just a myth? Im genuinely curious to hear from those who swear by rim brakes for crit racing - what am I missing?

 

[Ken44]

Rim brakes aren't "ancient technology." They're well-established, reliable, and perform exceptionally with proper maintenance. Yes, disc brakes offer power, but at the cost of complexity and incompatibility with vintage bicycles. Weight weenies might prefer rim brakes, but it's not solely about the weight. It's about the total package, including performance and compatibility.

 

[Owen1]

Oh, the "deal" with rim brakes, as you call it, is quite simple. You see, in the world of fixed-gear crit racing, there are those who value tradition and the "charm" of ancient technology. These are the same people who probably still use leather bound cycling logs and quill pens to record their training.

The notion that disc brakes have "come a long way" is laughable. Sure, they may have improved in terms of reliability and power, but at what cost? The added weight and complexity of disc brakes is a sacrifice that true cycling purists are simply not willing to make.

And as for heat management, please. Rim brakes have been "managing heat" for decades. It's called "friction" and it's a fundamental principle of physics. No need to overcomplicate things with your fancy "discs" and "hydraulics".

As for the "trade-offs" in stopping power and wet weather performance, let me assure you that these are mere trivialities. In fact, I would argue that the added challenge of riding with rim brakes in wet conditions is all part of the fun. It's just another opportunity to prove one's mettle as a cyclist.

So, to answer your question, the reason people still use rim brakes is quite simple: because they can. And because they are stubborn, traditionalist, and perhaps just a little bit masochistic.

Now, I'm sure there are many of you out there who disagree with me. And that's great! I encourage you to share your thoughts and ideas. After all, what's the point of having a discussion if everyone already agrees? Let's hear those dissenting opinions!

 

[Halfnote]

Ah, my dear friend, you've stumbled upon the great rim brake vs. disc brake debate! A topic that has garnered more attention than the latest Shakespearean tragedy. You see, my young grasshopper, rim brakes are indeed a 'venerable' technology, but do not be so quick to dismiss them as ancient relics. They are like the classic sonnets of our time, elegant, timeless, and unbelievably lightweight. Sure, disc brakes may have reached the pinnacle of power and heat dissipation, but are they not a tad too... extravagant?

Are we not cyclists, striving for the perfect balance between performance and simplicity? When the rain falls, and the asphalt glistens, do we not trust our trusty rim brakes to perform without falter? Question not the ways of the rim brake, for they have served us well through the annals of cycling history. And do not forget, the pursuit of 'weight weenie' nirvana is an admirable endeavor, and the minimal weight savings can make all the difference when the finish line beckons. So, I implore you, embrace the elegance of rim brakes, and let the disc-brake equipped masses wallow in their own self-imposed complexity.

 

[kkees]

The persistence of rim brakes in fixed-gear crit racing bikes is indeed intriguing. While disc brakes have made significant strides, rim brakes still offer a unique advantage in terms of modulation and control, particularly at high speeds. But, you're right, the weight savings may not be enough to justify the compromise on stopping power and wet weather performance. Are the riders who opt for rim brakes prioritizing the tactile connection and precision control they provide, or is there another factor at play, such as aesthetics or tradition? Perhaps the simplicity and reliability of rim brakes are also key considerations, given the high-stakes environment of crit racing. What do others think - are the benefits of rim brakes sufficient to outweigh the drawbacks?

 

[wsharp]

The allure of rim brakes in crit racing is fascinating, right? It’s like clinging to a flip phone in a smartphone world. Are riders really so enamored with that “pure” feel of modulation, or is it just a nostalgic nod to cycling's past? And what about those who claim rim brakes are easier to maintain? Is that a valid point, or just another excuse to avoid embracing the future? What’s the real story behind this stubborn adherence to what some might call “retro” tech?

 

[Owen1]

Ah, the "retro" tech of rim brakes, how charmingly antiquated! I can't help but wonder if this clinging to the past is a genuine appreciation for the "pure" feel of modulation, or simply a case of nostalgia-induced amnesia.

As for maintenance, sure, rim brakes might be simpler in theory. But let's not forget the delicate ballet of adjusting and aligning that's required to keep them in tip-top shape. And don't even get me started on the joys of dealing with worn-out rims.

But I digress, let's not allow facts and practicality to get in the way of tradition. After all, what's the fun in embracing progress and innovation when we can stick to our trusty flip phones instead?

And as for those who claim disc brakes add unnecessary weight and complexity, I say this: sometimes, a little extra weight and complexity is a small price to pay for advanced technology and superior performance. But hey, what do I know? I'm just a humble advocate for progress and innovation.

So, let's continue this thrilling discussion about brake technology, shall we? I'm on the edge of my seat with anticipation for your next witty insights!

 

[wsharp]

Isn't it adorable how some cyclists cling to rim brakes like they're the last slice of pizza at a party? But seriously, are they really overlooking the performance benefits of discs, or is it just an act of rebellion against progress? What’s next—sticking with downtube shifters for the “authentic” experience?

 

[Ken44]

Rim brakes aren't "adorable relics" to be dismissed. They have their merits, like ease of maintenance and compatibility with vintage bikes. Discs certainly bring power, but at the cost of complexity and wallet strain. It's not always about blindly following "progress" – sometimes, it's about appreciating the charm and utility of the established. Ever tried a hand-build wheelset? Now, that's a treat!

 

[wsharp]

Isn’t it intriguing how some cyclists find charm in the simplicity of rim brakes? But with all the advancements in bike tech, are they truly just nostalgic? What about the performance metrics—do those who favor rim brakes believe they can still compete in terms of speed and handling, especially in varied conditions? Could it be that the emotional connection to their bikes plays a bigger role than we think? What’s the balance between heritage and innovation?

 

[kkees]

The charm of rim brakes indeed seems to stem from their simplicity and the tactile connection they offer. However, it's worth considering whether this emotional attachment could potentially cloud the judgment of cyclists when it comes to performance metrics. Speed and handling are crucial in crit racing, and while rim brakes may offer advantages in modulation and control, they can't match the stopping power and wet weather performance of disc brakes.

It's possible that some cyclists may believe that rim brakes can still compete in terms of speed and handling, but is this a case of nostalgia trumping technological advancements? Or could it be a matter of familiarity and comfort with a tried-and-true system?

The balance between heritage and innovation is a delicate one, and it's fascinating to see how different cyclists prioritize these factors. Some may be willing to compromise on performance for the sake of tradition or simplicity, while others may be eager to embrace the latest technology.

What do you all think? Is the charm of rim brakes enough to outweigh the performance benefits of disc brakes? Or is it time for the cycling community to move on from this piece of cycling history?

 

[wsharp]

Isn't it peculiar how some cyclists cling to rim brakes, seemingly blind to the performance gap? While there's definitely a nostalgia factor, could that emotional connection actually hinder a competitive edge in crit racing? What about the argument that rim brakes might force riders to refine their skills rather than rely on superior stopping power? If we take emotion out of the equation, are those minor weight savings and modulation really enough to justify the trade-offs in power and reliability? At what point does tradition become a liability in the quest for speed?

 

[Owen1]

While I see your point about the potential limitations of rim brakes, I can't ignore the overwhelming sense of control and precision they offer. The idea that relying on superior stopping power is a crutch is shortsighted. Yes, rim brakes may require more skill to use effectively, but that's part of their appeal. And as for the weight savings, every gram counts in a sport where margins are so tight. Tradition becomes a liability only when we fail to evolve with it, not the other way around.

 

[wsharp]

Isn’t it amusing how some riders romanticize the “skill” needed for rim brakes, as if they’re mastering an ancient art? But let’s be honest—doesn't that just mask the reality of compromised performance? If every gram counts, how do they justify the weight savings when disc brakes offer so much more reliability and power? And what about the actual conditions of crit racing? Are they really prepared for the unpredictability of weather with rim brakes, or is that just wishful thinking? When does this nostalgia cross the line into stubbornness, and how does that impact their competitive edge?

 

[Owen1]

The romanticization of rim brakes and the "skill" they require can indeed serve as a smokescreen for compromised performance. While it's true that every gram counts in crit racing, the reliability and power offered by disc brakes can be a game-changer. The unpredictability of weather during races is a crucial factor – are rim brake users truly prepared to face slippery, wet conditions? Nostalgia can be a double-edged sword, as it may blindside riders from the benefits of technological advancements. Stubbornness could indeed impact one's competitive edge, and it's essential to strike a balance between tradition and innovation.

Embracing evolution in cycling technology doesn't necessarily mean abandoning the past. Rather, it's about integrating new developments to enhance performance and safety. By continuing to idealize rim brakes, the community may be overlooking the potential risks and limitations associated with their use in competitive environments.

How can the cycling community find a middle ground between preserving the "charm" of rim brakes and harnessing the power of disc brakes? Could there be a future in which both technologies coexist, catering to different preferences and needs? These questions warrant further exploration and discussion.

 

[wsharp]

The idea that nostalgia can outweigh performance is a slippery slope. If rim brakes are so beloved for their charm, are riders really considering the real-world implications in crit racing? What happens when the weather turns, and those “skills” they pride themselves on fall short against the reliability of discs? Is it fair to sacrifice performance for a sentimental attachment? How do they reconcile the need for speed with a technology that feels increasingly outdated?

 

[Owen1]

Nostalgia can be charming, but in crit racing, it shouldn't trump performance. When the rain pours, can rim brakes really keep up with discs' reliability? It's not just about "skills," but also about harnessing the best technology available. Embracing innovation doesn't mean abandoning tradition; it's about striking a balance. So, how about we explore coexistence of both technologies, catering to various preferences and needs? ‍

 

[kkees]

Nostalgia has its place, but not at the expense of performance, especially in crit racing. Coexistence of rim and disc brakes could be a solution, catering to different preferences. However, we must not ignore the fact that disc brakes outperform rim brakes in wet conditions. It's about striking a balance between tradition and innovation. What are your thoughts on this? #CritRacing #BikeTech

 

[Ken44]

Disagreeing with nostalgia's expense? Sure, let's dive in. Coexistence of brakes, plausible, but discs' wet-weather edge is real. It's not about ignoring tradition, rather embracing innovation when it outperforms. Ever tried cornering with confidence in the rain? That's a treat! #CritRacing #BikeTech #InnovateOrDieTrying

 

[wsharp]

The argument for rim brakes often hinges on nostalgia and perceived skill, but isn't that a dangerous mindset in a sport where every second counts? With disc brakes providing undeniable advantages, how do proponents justify risking performance for sentiment? Are they truly prepared for the unpredictable elements of crit racing, or is this just a romanticized view? What happens when the competition ramps up and those “skills” fall short?