Road Cycling · Public discussion

Why Ed Dolan is worthless!

Started by Not Ed · · Last activity · 5 posts · 1,059 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 June 2008
Last activity
17 June 2008
Original author
Not Ed
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
1,059
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Edward Dolan" <[email hidden]> writes [censored].

  2. in rec.bicycles.tech said:

    I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
    there?

    Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
    your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
    read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

    Jones

  3. "!Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    in rec.bicycles.tech said:

    I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
    there?

    Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
    your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
    read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

    Jones

    'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

  4. On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:03:03 +0100, in rec.bicycles.tech "Colin

    Nelson said:


    "!Jones" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    in rec.bicycles.tech said:

    I guess there's no way to block people like this from posting is
    there?

    Yes. They are known as "delete" buttons. Other than that, you take
    your chances; however, I've not met the man who could *force* me to
    read something when I had made up my mind to the contrary.

    Jones

    'Block sender' is useful ... By Jones.

    I suppose. I've never used it becuase I'm not willing to admit that
    *anyone* can get that far under my skin... an ex-wife, maybe, but not
    an ASCII stream. Usually, they simply bore me to the point where I'm
    no longer motivated to click on their messages, thus "blocking"
    themselves.

    Personally, I prefer someone who pisses me off and challenges my world
    view, Every now and then, someone on Usenet will do so... mostly it's
    mindless noise, but I read hoping someone will astound me.

    Jones


  5. Quoted message said:

    I suppose. I've never used it becuase I'm not willing to admit that
    *anyone* can get that far under my skin... an ex-wife, maybe, but not
    an ASCII stream. Usually, they simply bore me to the point where I'm
    no longer motivated to click on their messages, thus "blocking"
    themselves.

    Personally, I prefer someone who pisses me off and challenges my world
    view, Every now and then, someone on Usenet will do so... mostly it's
    mindless noise, but I read hoping someone will astound me.

    Jones

    Okay, here's the problem. People have that idiot in their killfiles and
    avoid reading posts by someone who simply reposts what the idiot's
    rant-of-the-day happens to be. So, you just might wind up in killfiles as
    well---the killfiles of people who will come to associate your name with
    reposting the idiot's rants. You may write many cogent posts, but nobody
    will read them because they'll be leary of being exposed to the idiot. It's
    a circle, but there it is.....

    Pat in TX

    Quoted message said:

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.