Road Cycling · Public discussion

Why do races start slowly?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 5 posts · 615 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
18 March 2006
Last activity
19 March 2006
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
615
Views / 30 days
0
Topics

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I am just watching the Commonwealth Games on the telly.
    I am not a cycling fan but could you tell me why the velodrome racing
    starts are done so slowly. I am sure tactics are involved but, sorry, I
    just cannot understand. How can records be broken if the riders are
    going as slow as possible for part of the race.

  2. Quoted message said:

    How can records be broken if the riders are
    going as slow as possible for part of the race.

    Because a lot of timed intervals, such as they are, aren't at the
    beginning and records aren't the point anyway? Which event are you
    talking about?

    Curtis L. Russell
    Odenton, MD (USA)
    Just someone on two wheels...

  3. Quoted message said:

    I am just watching the Commonwealth Games on the telly.
    I am not a cycling fan but could you tell me why the velodrome racing
    starts are done so slowly. I am sure tactics are involved but, sorry, I
    just cannot understand. How can records be broken if the riders are
    going as slow as possible for part of the race.

    It depends on the event. In many of the timed events a flying start is the rule
    and there's no reason to rush that. Better to save energy for the fast bit. In
    sprinting against another rider the advantage usually goes to the rider in back.

    Ron

  4. In article <[email hidden]>,

    Curtis L. Russell said:
    Quoted message said:

    How can records be broken if the riders are
    going as slow as possible for part of the race.

    Because a lot of timed intervals, such as they are, aren't at the
    beginning and records aren't the point anyway? Which event are you
    talking about?

    Hm. A slow-starting track event? Match sprints, perhaps?

    What happens in a one-on-one sprint is this: for evenly matched
    opponents, being the rider behind is a big advantage, because you are
    drafting the lead rider, meaning you are doing much less work, and can
    slipstream up behind him at speed and come out from the slipstream with
    more speed than the lead rider. Also, you can react to the easily-seen
    rider ahead of you.

    Because of this, most of the event is spent jockeying for positition. In
    a 1000m sprint, only the last 200m is timed.

    Wikipedia explains this reasonably well:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprint_%28cycling%29

    Note that current rules specify that riders must move at at least "a
    walking pace," thus preventing some of the trackstand duels of yore,
    where both riders might be completely stopped, balancing their bikes,
    waiting for the other rider to make a move.

    --
    Ryan Cousineau [email hidden] http://www.wiredcola.com/
    "I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
    to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

  5. Thanks very much. Now I understand. I had no idea that only the last
    200m were timed.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.