General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Why Am I Spared?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 572 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
13 June 2004
Last activity
17 June 2004
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
572
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I keep reading here about the alledged horrible health results of the
    mercury in amalgam fillings, yet I've experenced none of those problems
    despite having some fillings of this very same kind dating back over
    four decades (I know they're not supposed to last that long, but they
    have), with the most recent one eight years ago, & the rest somewhere in
    between. I have only one porcelein filling in my whole mouth.

    I've also have three crowns, which necessitated drilling out very old
    fillings.

    In the end, I've happily co-existed with mucho amalgam fillings for over
    55 years. Is my body just "less sensitive" to mercury whatever than
    other people's? I doubt it would be less sensitive to say arsenic
    poisoning...I probably have a great immune system, but not that great.
    Yet from reading these threads & comments, amalgam dental fillings seem
    only one step below slow arsenic poisoning on the "danger" scale.

    So, why not me?

    P.S. I don't chew gum, but I do drink hot liquids.

  2. Quoted message said:

    In the end, I've happily co-existed with mucho amalgam fillings for over
    55 years. Is my body just "less sensitive" to mercury whatever than
    other people's? I doubt it would be less sensitive to say arsenic
    poisoning...I probably have a great immune system, but not that great.
    Yet from reading these threads & comments, amalgam dental fillings seem
    only one step below slow arsenic poisoning on the "danger" scale.

    So, why not me?

    As Keith P Walsh has explained, a certain threshold voltage is
    required to stop the rotation of the mercury atoms and release
    them from the amalgam matrix. So, you have to be subject to
    the additional risk factor of exposure to electromagnetic fields
    from cellphone towers, high-tension power lines, or government
    mind-control satellites.

    http://www.google.com/groups?selm=8385d874.0309181149.7b7682f6%40posting.google.com

  3. Quoted message said:


    I keep reading here about the alledged horrible health results of the
    mercury in amalgam fillings, yet I've experenced none of those problems
    despite having some fillings of this very same kind dating back over
    four decades (I know they're not supposed to last that long, but they
    have), with the most recent one eight years ago, & the rest somewhere in
    between. I have only one porcelein filling in my whole mouth.

    I've also have three crowns, which necessitated drilling out very old
    fillings.

    In the end, I've happily co-existed with mucho amalgam fillings for over
    55 years. Is my body just "less sensitive" to mercury whatever than
    other people's? I doubt it would be less sensitive to say arsenic
    poisoning...I probably have a great immune system, but not that great.
    Yet from reading these threads & comments, amalgam dental fillings seem
    only one step below slow arsenic poisoning on the "danger" scale.

    So, why not me?

    P.S. I don't chew gum, but I do drink hot liquids.

    Kathy, one of the primary effects of Amalgam Related Illness is the way it
    affects your ability to preceive your own condition. Mercury amalgams have a
    way of masking their insidious effects on your nervous system. You will not
    notice any ill-effects until such time as you become sufficiently aware of just
    how gosh-darm toxic your body is as a result of those 3-electron mercury ions.

    By foolishly ignoring this serious condition, you may not avail yourself of the
    therapuetic catharsis of the healing crisis that results from Amalgam removal.
    Sure, the process is expensive, painful, and releases more Mercury than you
    would otherwise be exposed to for the rest of your life, but the relief that
    comes with the knowledge you've been had, uh, healed is priceless.

  4. The fillings are still intact. I do suspect old deteriorating filling can be
    problem (not the mercury but decay). Also good selenium status
    would go alone way to reduce mecury toxicity.

    <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    I keep reading here about the alledged horrible health results of the
    mercury in amalgam fillings, yet I've experenced none of those problems
    despite having some fillings of this very same kind dating back over
    four decades (I know they're not supposed to last that long, but they
    have), with the most recent one eight years ago, & the rest somewhere in
    between. I have only one porcelein filling in my whole mouth.

    I've also have three crowns, which necessitated drilling out very old
    fillings.

    In the end, I've happily co-existed with mucho amalgam fillings for over
    55 years. Is my body just "less sensitive" to mercury whatever than
    other people's? I doubt it would be less sensitive to say arsenic
    poisoning...I probably have a great immune system, but not that great.
    Yet from reading these threads & comments, amalgam dental fillings seem
    only one step below slow arsenic poisoning on the "danger" scale.

    So, why not me?

    P.S. I don't chew gum, but I do drink hot liquids.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.