Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

whither "Velo Research" ?

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 2 posts · 505 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
17 July 2005
Last activity
17 July 2005
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
505
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. here's a patent for a bicycle-powered air-pump.

    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/patents/us/539/5397144/5397144.pdf

    The patent is assigned to VELO RESEARCH

    can't find anyone by that name on the Net.

    anyone know their current name?

  2. Quoted message said:

    here's a patent for a bicycle-powered air-pump.

    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/patents/us/539/5397144/5397144.pdf

    The patent is assigned to VELO RESEARCH

    can't find anyone by that name on the Net.

    anyone know their current name?

    The name VELO RESEARCH is not registered as a corporation with the
    State of Washington at this time, even in Inactive status. I suspect
    that this means that the company simply failed.

    In closely reading the description of the device and the material
    parameters that were expected to be required as stated by the
    designer, some of the flaws in the device become apparent. The
    designer acknowledges that temperatures of 250F could be expected in
    the cylinders, pistons, and cylinder ends, with the observation that
    very special plastics would have to be employed in construction if
    metal was not used. If metal was employed, manufacturing tolerances
    would have had to be uneconomically close according to the documents.

    In other words, it was possible to build the device, but it wasn't
    going to be possible to build it cheaply using metal components, and
    it wasn't possible to build it from plastic unless exotic and possibly
    hard-to-employ materials were chosen. Potential puchasers might have
    found the heat factor unacceptable in any event. Potential investors
    may have been additionally concerned about the product liability
    issues resulting from that heat. I can also see how potential
    investors might have been put off by the simple stupidity of the
    marketplace; how many of these pumps would have been returned damaged
    by fools who would have tried to pedal *forwards* instead of back?
    How many would have further filed liability actions because the device
    wasn't designed to prevent them from trying that? And could the
    inverstors have been found for an expensive (by comparison to its
    competition, the hand-operated pump) gadget with a relatively small
    market?

    I can predict with some confidence that Ron Popeil wouldn't have been
    interested.

    It was a clever attempt, though; I'll give them that.

    Lots of patents are issued for devices which never get produced. The
    reasons are many, but "lack of commercial value" is the single largest
    category.
    --
    Typoes are a feature, not a bug.
    Some gardening required to reply via email.
    Words processed in a facility that contains nuts.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.