General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

whistleblower axed

Started by Fresh~Horses · · Last activity · 1 post · 330 views

This thread is locked and is currently read-only.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
17 May 2004
Last activity
17 May 2004
Original author
Fresh~Horses
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
330
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This story
    bmj.bmjjournals.com1153

    February story bmj.bmjjournals.comabrid
    ged/328/7435/306

    Whistleblower removed from job for talking to the press
    Jeanne Lenzer New York

    A whistleblower who uncovered evidence that major drug
    companies sought to influence government officials has been
    removed from his job and placed on administrative leave.

    Allen Jones, an investigator at the Pennsylvania Office of
    the Inspector General (OIG), was escorted out of his
    workplace on 28 April and told "not to appear on OIG
    property" after OIG officials accused him of talking to the
    press. Reports of Mr Jones's findings were widely reported
    in the New York Times, BMJ (7 February, p 306), and
    elsewhere.

    His findings showed that the pharmaceutical company Janssen
    had paid honorariums to key state officials who held
    influence over the drugs prescribed in state-run prisons and
    mental hospitals.

    Mr Jones filed a suit on 7 May against his supervisors
    charging that the OIG's policy of barring employees from
    talking to the media was "unconstitutional." Mr Jones
    claims, in the complaint filed in the Middle District Court
    of Pennsylvania, that he is being harassed by his superiors
    and Pennsylvania governmental institutions in order to
    "coverup, discourage, and limit any investigations or
    oversight into the corrupt practices of large drug companies
    and corrupt public officials who have acted with them."

    Mr Jones had been earlier removed as lead investigator on
    the case after being told by a manager that "drug companies
    write cheques to politicians on both sides of the aisle."

    In July 2002 Mr Jones was appointed lead investigator when
    he uncovered evidence of payments into an off-the-books
    account. The account, earmarked for "educational grants" was
    funded in large part by Pfizer and Janssen Pharmaceuticals.
    Payments were made from the account to state employees who
    developed formulary guidelines recommending expensive new
    drugs over older, cheaper drugs with proved track records.

    One of the recommended drugs was Janssen's antipsychotic
    medicine risperidone (Risperdal)—a drug that has recently
    been found to have potentially lethal side effects. The Food
    and Drug Administration issued a warning letter to Janssen
    on 27 April saying that Janssen's "Dear Healthcare Provider"
    letter about risperidone was "false or misleading" because
    it failed to disclose or minimised risks of the drug
    relating to "serious adverse events including ketoacidosis,
    hyperosmolar coma, and death."

    Don Bailey, Mr Jones's attorney, said the case is a critical
    test of the right to a free press. "If they shut the
    employee up and they have all the documents locked up in a
    drawer there is no free press," he said.

    Amy Wasserleben, spokeswoman for the OIG, said they would
    not comment on Mr Jones or the corruption allegations. When
    asked about the status of the corruption investigation she
    refused to answer. In response to a question about whether
    the state OIG could withhold information of public
    interest, she said, "The OIG is specifically exempt from
    right-to-know laws."

    The Pennsylvania formulary is based on the Texas Medication
    Algorithm Project that has been exported to about 12 states
    and was recently commended as a model programme by President
    Bush's New Freedom Commission.

    However, Dr Peter J Weiden, who was a member of the
    project's expert consensus panel, charges that the
    guidelines are based on "opinions, not data" and that bias
    due to funding sources undermines the credibility of the
    guidelines since "most of the guideline's authors have
    received support from the pharmaceutical industry."

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.