General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

when is a person disabled according to social security?

Started by Tom Allen · · Last activity · 3 posts · 411 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
21 August 2003
Last activity
28 December 2003
Original author
Tom Allen
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
411
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. According to the Social Security Administration, to receive disability
    a person must have an impairment. The impairment must be severe enough
    that it keeps them from working, or earning above a certain amount,
    for at least twelve months.

    What does this mean? It means several things.

    First, a person's medical records must indicate the presence of an
    impairment, either physical or mental in nature, or a combination of
    the two.

    Second, the condition must be severe enough that it prevents the
    person from working, or, if they continue to work, prevents the person
    from earning more than $800.00 each month. This amount is referred to
    as SGA, or substantial gainful activity. It is important to note that
    this amount is before taxes .

    Third, the condition must last at least twelve calendar months, or be
    projected to last that long.

    Therefore, applicants for disability should realize the following:
    A claimant may be granted disability on the basis of one impairment,
    or on the basis of several impairments. But the condition must be
    severe enough to significantly affect the ability to work. This means
    the condition must last at least twelve months, or be expected to last
    that long. It also means that while "back conditions" usually fall
    into the severe category, "wrist and ankle sprains" seldom do.
    A person may be working when they apply for disability, and may
    continue to work after they have been approved---as long as they do
    not earn more than the SGA amount. The SGA amount changes
    periodically, but currently it is $800.00 per month. It is important
    to remember this is a gross income amount, i.e. before taxes have been
    deducted.
    A person earning more than the SGA amount who applies for disability
    will, essentially, be denied the same day without having their
    impairments or medical records even considered.
    The specific answer to Question One, however, is this: in the eyes of
    Social Security , a claimant is considered disabled when:
    They have a severe impairment that has lasted, or will last, twelve
    months.
    They are unable to perform work (work they have done in the past)
    while earning in excess of $800.00 per month.
    They are unable to perform other types of work, typically work related
    to their past work (for example, a car mechanic might be expected to
    switch to motorcycle engine repair if the job duties are similar
    enough).
    When a Claimant passes this litmus test, they are considered to be
    disabled.

    more answers can be found at www.disabilitysecrets.com

  2. On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:21:14 -0400, Tim Moore wrote
    (in message <[email hidden]>😉:

    Quoted message said:

    nessa,

    which dds did you work for? in what state?

    I work for social security at headquarters at the 800 number

    Nessa
    --
    I don't have issues
    I have subscriptions
    www.nessa.info

  3. Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg, of Ann Arbor, Michigan posted the pathological
    lies, veiled threats, false accusations or personal attacks on Linda Gore,
    sane members of Linda's family, or Linda's usenet friends contained in the
    post below.

    Patricia Gore Gregg has repeatedly been informed for a decade that Linda
    Gore wants nothing whatsoever to do with Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg.

    Patricia Gore Gregg disregards Linda Gore's demand Patricia leave her the
    hell alone, and Patricia trolls, stalks, harasses and defames Linda Gore
    instead because of what an extraordinarily vile, sadistic, depraved,
    vicious, malicious, narcissistic/psychopathic person Patricia Sharon Gore
    Gregg is.

    Linda Gore determined there exists no legitimate place for Patricia Gore
    Gregg, her eldest sister, in Linda Gore's life because of the outrageous
    abuse Patricia Gore Gregg has engaged in towards Linda Gore for 47 years,
    solely owing to Patricia's narcissistic rage since Linda' birth because
    Patricia was no longer the only child.

    Linda Gore accepts the reality that Patricia Gore Gregg will never ever
    cease desiring that Linda be retroactively aborted nor attempting to destroy
    Linda so long as Linda breathes.

    Linda Gore wised up to that reality and denied Patricia Gore Gregg a place
    in Linda's life in the aftermath of an incident wherein Patricia Gore Gregg
    severely traumatized Linda Gore's young son, a dozen years ago, when
    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's rage incited Patricia to abandon and strand
    Linda Gore and her then 4 year old son, 2500 miles from Linda's home, with
    only the shirt and pants they had on, while taking Linda Gore's purse,
    wallet, ID, money, essential thyroid medication and even both Linda and
    her 4 year old son shoes, etc, traumatizing Linda's young son. Patricia
    Sharon Gore Gregg traumatized him a second time by her calling ahead to
    SanDiego where her husband was a guest in Linda Gore's townhome, and
    instructing her husband to lock linda Gore and her 4 year old son out of
    their own home, and further instructing him to STEAL Linda Gore's auto,
    a felony which Linda Gore deeply regrets not having prosecuted both Patricia
    and James Gregg for ---so these awful people be locked up in PRISON where
    they can't be making decent people physically ill.

    Three years ago, many years after Linda Gore booted Patricia Gore Gregg
    from linda's life, Patricia Gore's rage at being unable to locate Linda
    Gore for so many years, grew to such proportions that Patricia went over
    the edge, in the humble opinon of members of Patricia's FOO, as she was
    allegeldy making threats to physically harm people, so members of Patricia
    Sharon Gore Gregg's FOO proposed a psychiatric intervention for Patricia
    Sharon Gore Gregg.

    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's mother was asked to write a history of Patricia
    Sharon Gore Gregg's life to help Patricia Sharon
    Gore Gregg's psychiatrist help Patricia.

    By the time Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's Mother finished writing the story
    of Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's life, she realized what Patricia had been
    doing to her FOO was terrorizing it, and titled the work "Reign of Terror".

    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg got ahold of a copy of the document, titled
    REIGN OF TERROR, allegedly by stealing it, and reacted vindictively to her
    terrorism of members of her FOO being documented by her mother initially by
    harassing her mother about the document in her Mother's social circles.

    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's mother responded to Patricia's attempt to
    misuse the document prepared confidentially for Patricia's pdoc, by
    copyrighting it.

    In the meantime, Patricia Gore Gregg located Linda Gore, discovering Linda
    Gore
    had been "hiding out" from the world--- on a usenet public support,
    ASD-med discussing antidepressant meds Linda Gore took to augment her
    thyroid medication.

    Then later, on the Tourettes group owing to her son's TS, and then the
    ADHD group owing to linda's growing suspicion linda had ADHD underlying her
    thyroid disease.

    Whereupon Patricia Gore Gregg commenced this usenet protracted trolling,
    flaming, stalkiing, harassing and posting pathological lies to defame
    Linda Gore.

    Initially, Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg attempted to persuade Linda to
    disregard her pdoc's opinion that Linda Gore is fine, and any psych
    symptoms she has are secondary to her medical conditions or owing to living
    such a sucky life being trolled by Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg for 47 years.

    Failing to persuade Linda to ignore her own doctors, Patricia Sharon Gore
    Gregg must have decided to troll, stalk, harass, and defame Linda Gore
    and try to MAKE her ill by so doing!

    Patricia began her trolling of Linda in earnest by posting posts providing
    personally identifying info about Linda, her son, and other members of
    Linda Gore's FOO to a delusional, deranged usenet poster whom had homicidal
    ideations led to somebody posting posts soliciting Linda Gore's murder, in
    the deranged man's unique writing style.

    While Linda Gore had been around usenet long enough to know it was futile to
    attempt to control what Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg posted, including
    personal identifying info potentially endangering peoples lives, Linda
    Gore's mother and younger brother, both residents of New Jersey were not
    willing to ignore Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's posting posts providing a
    potentionally dangerous man, also a resident of New Jersey, personally
    identifying info about Linda, her son and the other NJ members of Linda's
    FOO---and her mother and younger brother filed complaints regarding Patricia
    Sharon Gore Gregg's posting such info with Patricia's ISP, Posting hosts,
    Google, and authorities where appropriate, and got Patricias accounts
    closed, posts removed etc.

    In response to Linda's mother and younger brothers activities to stop
    Patricia Gore Gregg net abuse, Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg posted Linda
    Gore's mother and ex's telephone number on the manic ng, as well as,
    posted posts containing false accusations Linda Gore was filing net abuse
    complaints against Patricia Gore Gregg.

    Linda Gore hadn't been being baited by Patricia's trolling, stalking,
    harssment and defamation, until
    Patricia Gore Gregg posted posts denying the reality Patricia's mother and
    younger brother were the one's filing all the complaints against Patricia
    and getting her accounts closed and posts removed for her reckless
    endangerment of members of her FOO.

    Patricia Gore Gregg's followed up posting those false accusations on Linda's
    regular NG's with posts to SPP falsely accusing Linda Gore, the absent
    member of the family for the psych intervention other family members had
    sought for Patricia three years ago.

    Those insane posters were followed up by Patricia posting insane posts on
    the sci.psychology.psychotherapy newsgroup falsely accusing Linda Gore
    of authoring or co-authoring the copyrighted work titled.."Reign of Terorr"
    Patricia's mother had written to document Patricia Gore Gregg's abuse
    of her FOO.

    When Linda Gore posted a post informing the world the actual author of the
    Reign of Terror had copyrighted her work, and the author was not Linda
    Gore,
    Patricia Gore Gregg changed the pathological lies she was posting on SPP
    about the "Reign of Terror", to lies where Patricia falsely asserted the
    allegations the "Reign of Terror" contained about Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg
    sexually molesting a sibling were Linda Gore's allegations.

    Linda Gore did not author the "Reign of Terror".

    Linda Gore made NO contribution whatsoever to the contents of the document
    titled "Reign of Terror".

    Linda Gore was not aware that the document "Reign of Terror" had been
    written until Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg began harassing Linda Gore in
    cyberspace about it's contents.

    When Linda Gore decided there was no legitimate place in her life for
    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg, Linda Gore had informed relatives she desired
    to be kept out of the loop with regards to any news of Patricia Sharon Gore
    Gregg's acts of malice against members of her FOO.

    The allegations contained in the "Reign of Terror" about Patricia Gore
    Gregg's sexual molestation of a sibling were made by Patricia Gregg's middle
    brother.

    No one knew a thing about Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's baby
    raping/sodomizing of Linda Gore when LG was 3yo, or about Patricia Gore
    Gregg's flying into a terrorfying rage during which she tried to rape LG
    when LG was 11,
    until Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg posted posts falsely accusing Linda Gore of
    having been the one whose allegations of that nature were contained in the
    document "Reign of Terror."

    Patricias posting of those incidents not only informed the entire world of
    Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's depravity, for the first time, but distressed
    Linda by reminding linda of events Linda had spent a lifetime seeking to
    forget.

    Most recently, Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's, a vile baby sodomizer/rapist,
    a pathological liar, a thief, a home wrecker, a child abandoner, the 47
    year long terrorizer of members of her FOO, the traumatizer of their
    children, an elder abuser,
    and a serial stalker IRL, has followed her years of terrorizing members of
    her FOO by allegedly going to the social services department of one or
    members she's been terrorizing, and reporting them for living in what
    Patricia Gore Gregg's has "judged" to be depressed living conditions.

    Patricia Gore Gregg posting pathological lies and false accusations and
    threats and bait do sicken and depress Linda Gore.

    Because Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg's posts are undeniable and irrefutable
    evidence of what Linda Gore has always known; Patricia Sharon Gore Gregg is
    most likely criminally insane, and Patricia Gore Gregg has most likely
    always been criminally insane.

    X-Abuse-Trace: 446576696c734164766f63617465
    From: [email hidden] (DiChiera)
    Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative,alt.support.attn-deficit
    Subject: Re: when is a person disabled according to social security?
    Date: 21 Aug 2003 23:06:24 -0700
    Organization: http://groups.google.com/
    Lines: 64
    Message-ID: <[email hidden]>
    References: <[email hidden]>
    NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.87.80.142
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Trace: posting.google.com 1061532385 9485 127.0.0.1 (22 Aug 2003 06:06:25
    GMT)
    X-Complaints-To: [email hidden]
    NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Aug 2003 06:06:25 GMT
    Path:
    kermit!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!chi1.webusenet.com!news.w
    ebusenet.com!snoopy.risq.qc.ca!headwall.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!p
    ostnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
    Xref: kermit misc.health.alternative:227442 alt.support.attn-deficit:152916

    "DiChiera" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Tom,

    Thanks for posting this information, I know someone who might need to
    know some of this, and thought I'd pass it on.

    Thanks,

    Leah aka.


    ============================================================================
    ===

    Quoted message said:


    [email hidden] (Tom Allen) wrote in message


    news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    According to the Social Security Administration, to receive disability
    a person must have an impairment. The impairment must be severe enough
    that it keeps them from working, or earning above a certain amount,
    for at least twelve months.

    What does this mean? It means several things.

    First, a person's medical records must indicate the presence of an
    impairment, either physical or mental in nature, or a combination of
    the two.

    Second, the condition must be severe enough that it prevents the
    person from working, or, if they continue to work, prevents the person
    from earning more than $800.00 each month. This amount is referred to
    as SGA, or substantial gainful activity. It is important to note that
    this amount is before taxes .

    Third, the condition must last at least twelve calendar months, or be
    projected to last that long.

    Therefore, applicants for disability should realize the following:
    A claimant may be granted disability on the basis of one impairment,
    or on the basis of several impairments. But the condition must be
    severe enough to significantly affect the ability to work. This means
    the condition must last at least twelve months, or be expected to last
    that long. It also means that while "back conditions" usually fall
    into the severe category, "wrist and ankle sprains" seldom do.
    A person may be working when they apply for disability, and may
    continue to work after they have been approved---as long as they do
    not earn more than the SGA amount. The SGA amount changes
    periodically, but currently it is $800.00 per month. It is important
    to remember this is a gross income amount, i.e. before taxes have been
    deducted.
    A person earning more than the SGA amount who applies for disability
    will, essentially, be denied the same day without having their
    impairments or medical records even considered.
    The specific answer to Question One, however, is this: in the eyes of
    Social Security , a claimant is considered disabled when:
    They have a severe impairment that has lasted, or will last, twelve
    months.
    They are unable to perform work (work they have done in the past)
    while earning in excess of $800.00 per month.
    They are unable to perform other types of work, typically work related
    to their past work (for example, a car mechanic might be expected to
    switch to motorcycle engine repair if the job duties are similar
    enough).
    When a Claimant passes this litmus test, they are considered to be
    disabled.

    more answers can be found at www.disabilitysecrets.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.