Can a hobby truly be considered a favorite if it doesnt push the participant out of their comfort zone, or is the notion of a comfortable hobby an oxymoron in itself? Shouldnt the pursuit of a favorite hobby necessitate overcoming adversity, facing fears, and testing ones limits, rather than simply providing a leisurely distraction? Does the propensity for some hobbies to be low-stakes and easily accessible diminish their value and worth, or can the intrinsic rewards of these activities justify their classification as a favorite? Conversely, are high-risk, high-reward hobbies like extreme sports or competitive racing the only ones that can truly be considered favorites due to the immense physical and mental challenges they present? Should the criteria for a favorite hobby include a certain level of risk or adversity, and if not, what parameters should be used to evaluate and compare the relative merits of different hobbies?