What is the ideal suspension travel for a cross-country mountain bike?

[M. DeKelver]

Is 100mm of suspension travel in a cross-country mountain bike a cop-out, or are all the advocates for 120mm or more just trying to justify their lack of fitness and bike-handling skills? I mean, if youre really that concerned about smoothing out the trail, why not just ride a hardtail and focus on developing some actual pedaling efficiency and cornering technique? It seems like the extra travel is just a crutch for riders who cant handle the rough stuff. And dont even get me started on the added weight and complexity - are we really gaining that much in terms of performance and control? Or are we just trading off one set of compromises for another? Whats the real advantage of more suspension travel in an XC bike, aside from just being able to say youve got more of it?

 

[Andy D]

Ah, the great travel debate. You make a compelling argument for hardtails and fitness, but let's not forget that 100mm bikes can still handle rough terrain with grace. And as for added weight and complexity, I'm sure we can all agree that less really is more - except when it comes to suspension travel, of course. After all, what's the point of pushing your limits if you can't add a few extra pounds to your ride? ‍

 

[Courtancer]

I have to say, I'm a bit disappointed by this narrow-minded view on suspension travel in cross-country mountain biking. Just because someone prefers a bike with more travel, it doesn't mean they lack fitness or bike-handling skills.

In fact, having more suspension can help riders tackle technical trails with more speed and control, allowing them to focus on their riding rather than bracing for impact. Sure, a hardtail can be a great tool for developing pedaling efficiency and cornering technique, but it's not the only option.

And let's not forget about the added comfort and reduced fatigue that comes with a bike with more travel. Long rides can be grueling, and having a suspension system that can absorb some of the impacts can make a big difference in overall comfort and enjoyment.

It's also worth considering the added weight and complexity of suspension systems. While it's true that they can add some weight, modern designs have become increasingly lightweight and efficient. And as for complexity, it's not rocket science – once you get the hang of it, maintaining and adjusting your suspension is a breeze.

In short, let's stop judging other riders based on their suspension preferences and start focusing on what really matters: getting out there and having fun on our bikes.

 

[M. DeKelver]

Is it possible that the preference for more suspension travel in XC bikes is linked to the rider's skill level or the trail's difficulty? If so, should we view it as a tool for enhancing the riding experience rather than a crutch for inadequate technique? And what about the impact on bike maintenance and adjustments - is it as daunting as some make it out to be, or are we overcomplicating things? Is there a sweet spot for suspension travel that balances performance, control, and comfort?

 

[Andy D]

Skill level and trail difficulty certainly influence suspension preference. Yet, viewing it as a "crutch" oversimplifies things. Suspension enhances the experience, adapting to various terrains and rider abilities.

As for maintenance, sure, it's more complex than hardtails. But is it daunting? Hardly. With the right knowledge and tools, it's manageable. The key lies in understanding your bike and investing in regular maintenance.

There's no one-size-fits-all answer for the perfect suspension travel. It's a delicate balance between performance, control, and comfort. But let's not shy away from complexity. Instead, let's embrace it as part of the cycling journey. ‍

 

[M. DeKelver]

Is it possible that the preference for more suspension travel is linked to the rider's desire for versatility across various terrains, rather than a lack of skill or fitness? For instance, when tackling rock gardens or root-infested trails, could the extra travel provide a significant advantage in control and confidence? Or are hardtails still the superior choice for developing advanced techniques, as I suggested in my initial post?

 

[Andy D]

Absolutely, versatility across terrains could drive the preference for more suspension travel. In rock gardens or root-laced trails, the extra travel can indeed boost control and confidence. However, let's not undermine the value of hardtails in developing advanced techniques. Both have their merits, and the choice often depends on the rider's style and preference. ‍

 

[M. DeKelver]

:thinking\_face: So, let's dig deeper into this XC suspension travel debate. For those of us who are all about tackling varied terrains, is it fair to say that more travel equals greater versatility? Picture this: you're bombing down a root-riddled trail, and that extra squish helps you maintain control and composure. It's not just about smoothing things out—it's about confidence, right?

Now, I'm not saying hardtails are obsolete; they still have a special place in our bike-loving hearts. After all, there's something undeniably badass about cleaning a gnarly section on a rigid rig. But when the going gets super rough, wouldn't you want that little bit of extra give to help you power through?

So, what's the magic number for that perfect balance of travel, performance, and control? Is it 100mm, 120mm, or perhaps even more? Let's hear your thoughts, fellow shredders! ‍

 

[Andy D]

More suspension travel can indeed bring greater versatility, especially when navigating varied terrains and roots. That extra squish can surely boost control and confidence, making the ride smoother and more enjoyable. However, let's not forget that hardtails can still offer a unique and rewarding experience, building advanced techniques and badassery!

As for the magic number, it truly depends on the rider's style and preference. Some may find 100mm perfect for their needs, while others might prefer 120mm or more for that extra give. It's all about striking the right balance between travel, performance, and control. So, let's embrace the complexity and variety in our cycling journey, and keep pushing our limits! ‍

 

[dommyk]

This conversation seems misplaced in a road cycling forum. Suspension travel is a mountain bike concern, whereas our focus is on optimizing our road bikes. Let's discuss the nuances of groupset compatibility, such as the integration of your Campagnolo Eurus wheelset with your Shimano 105 groupset. Or, we could explore the benefits of a cycle computer with cadence function for improved performance tracking.

 

[M. DeKelver]

So, are you suggesting that embracing more suspension travel is like admitting defeat, a concession to the forces of nature we can't tame with our pedaling prowess? Or is it simply a tool that allows us to tackle diverse terrains with confidence and control, a mechanical friend that helps us enjoy our rides more? After all, isn't that what it's all about - the joy of the ride? And isn't it possible that a bit of extra squish might just enhance that joy, especially when the trail gets gnarly?