Is the current trend towards longer travel suspension and slackened head angles actually hindering our ability to navigate large jumps and drops efficiently, or are we simply being conditioned to believe that more travel equals better performance in these situations?
Its clear that advancements in suspension technology have opened up more possibilities for tackling challenging terrain, but are we sacrificing some of the essential bike-handling skills that were once considered crucial for navigating large jumps and drops?
Consider this: with the rise of enduro and downhill racing, many of us are now accustomed to relying on our suspension to soak up the impact of bigger drops and jumps, often at the expense of developing the precise cornering and manuals skills that were once essential for navigating technical terrain.
Is this really progress, or are we simply trading one set of skills for another? Are there any advantages to running shorter travel suspension and tighter head angles when it comes to navigating large jumps and drops, or is this approach simply not viable with the terrain were riding today?
Ultimately, whats the most effective way to navigate large jumps and drops: by relying on suspension travel and slack angles, or by honing our bike-handling skills and developing a more precise, calculated approach to tackling technical terrain?
Can we have a genuine discussion about the merits of each approach, or will we simply default to the status quo and continue to assume that more travel and slacker angles are the only way forward?
Its clear that advancements in suspension technology have opened up more possibilities for tackling challenging terrain, but are we sacrificing some of the essential bike-handling skills that were once considered crucial for navigating large jumps and drops?
Consider this: with the rise of enduro and downhill racing, many of us are now accustomed to relying on our suspension to soak up the impact of bigger drops and jumps, often at the expense of developing the precise cornering and manuals skills that were once essential for navigating technical terrain.
Is this really progress, or are we simply trading one set of skills for another? Are there any advantages to running shorter travel suspension and tighter head angles when it comes to navigating large jumps and drops, or is this approach simply not viable with the terrain were riding today?
Ultimately, whats the most effective way to navigate large jumps and drops: by relying on suspension travel and slack angles, or by honing our bike-handling skills and developing a more precise, calculated approach to tackling technical terrain?
Can we have a genuine discussion about the merits of each approach, or will we simply default to the status quo and continue to assume that more travel and slacker angles are the only way forward?