Its astonishing that so many cyclists prioritize style over substance when it comes to choosing a helmet for high-speed riding. Whats the point of having a sleek, aerodynamic design if it cant even protect your head in the event of a crash? Im calling out all the so-called experts who recommend helmets based on their weight and ventilation, without considering the actual safety features that matter.
Can anyone honestly say that the current crop of high-end helmets, with their fancy MIPS systems and angular designs, are actually safer than the more affordable options? Or are we just being duped by clever marketing and a desire to look pro?
I want to know: whats the real difference between a $200 helmet and a $500 one, aside from the price tag? Is it really worth shelling out top dollar for a helmet that may or may not provide better protection in a high-speed crash? Lets get real about helmet safety and stop prioritizing fashion over function.
Can anyone honestly say that the current crop of high-end helmets, with their fancy MIPS systems and angular designs, are actually safer than the more affordable options? Or are we just being duped by clever marketing and a desire to look pro?
I want to know: whats the real difference between a $200 helmet and a $500 one, aside from the price tag? Is it really worth shelling out top dollar for a helmet that may or may not provide better protection in a high-speed crash? Lets get real about helmet safety and stop prioritizing fashion over function.